From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: from lists.gentoo.org (pigeon.gentoo.org [208.92.234.80]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES256-GCM-SHA384 (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by finch.gentoo.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 67C8F138334 for ; Thu, 13 Sep 2018 10:44:34 +0000 (UTC) Received: from pigeon.gentoo.org (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by pigeon.gentoo.org (Postfix) with SMTP id 38E43E0BDE; Thu, 13 Sep 2018 10:44:31 +0000 (UTC) Received: from smtp.gentoo.org (smtp.gentoo.org [140.211.166.183]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES128-GCM-SHA256 (128/128 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by pigeon.gentoo.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id DB0C1E0BB3 for ; Thu, 13 Sep 2018 10:44:30 +0000 (UTC) Received: from eris.local (dynamic-adsl-84-220-72-110.clienti.tiscali.it [84.220.72.110]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES128-GCM-SHA256 (128/128 bits)) (No client certificate requested) (Authenticated sender: lu_zero) by smtp.gentoo.org (Postfix) with ESMTPSA id 4286B335CDC; Thu, 13 Sep 2018 10:44:28 +0000 (UTC) Subject: [gentoo-dev] Re: The state of libav stabilisation To: Andreas Sturmlechner , gentoo-dev@lists.gentoo.org Cc: media-video@gentoo.org References: <1676562.WTpo3CGDgJ@tuxbrain> From: Luca Barbato Message-ID: <7de7986c-e65d-3b87-9dac-15167ec739c7@gentoo.org> Date: Thu, 13 Sep 2018 12:44:24 +0200 User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (Macintosh; Intel Mac OS X 10.13; rv:60.0) Gecko/20100101 Thunderbird/60.0 Precedence: bulk List-Post: List-Help: List-Unsubscribe: List-Subscribe: List-Id: Gentoo Linux mail X-BeenThere: gentoo-dev@lists.gentoo.org Reply-to: gentoo-dev@lists.gentoo.org MIME-Version: 1.0 In-Reply-To: <1676562.WTpo3CGDgJ@tuxbrain> Content-Type: text/plain; charset=utf-8 Content-Language: en-US Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-Archives-Salt: f9952c93-6759-4b6a-b15c-940a6c6a0b95 X-Archives-Hash: fb5261623f9bfb1e555b94030a18c28c On 12/09/2018 12:38, Andreas Sturmlechner wrote: > Is there anyone still working on libav support? It appears to me that > transition[1] and stabilisation[2] trackers are stuck for a long time without > activity. Missing libav-12 stabilisation means that in several stable > packages, USE=libav is already inaccessible without manual unmasking of the > use flag. I am not prepared to start reverting upstream commits for support[3]. > > If this is not going to change, maybe media-video/libav should be dropped to > ~arch. This is still better than dropping support per-package or plastering > package.use.stable.mask with libav entries. > > [1] https://bugs.gentoo.org/show_bug.cgi?id=libav-12 > [2] https://bugs.gentoo.org/617508 > [3] https://bugs.gentoo.org/665518 > > > I guess nobody had time to, libav-12 is working correctly on those arches. Thanks for reminding us. lu