From: Michael Orlitzky <mjo@gentoo.org>
To: gentoo-dev@lists.gentoo.org
Subject: Re: [gentoo-dev] GLEP81 and /home
Date: Sun, 19 Jan 2020 22:16:57 -0500 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <7d1e608a-66e5-d026-7057-9acc227381fb@gentoo.org> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <CAGfcS_nmYT7swQ_4pMvyQKr2h6RMmycKxOCmmL9OugJitqUeTQ@mail.gmail.com>
On 1/19/20 9:52 PM, Rich Freeman wrote:
>>
>> Fantasy scenarios again. I'm not going to debunk a system that you just
>> thought up and that has never existed. Why don't you find one person who
>> actually does this, and see if it bothers him if we create a home
>> directory under /home where it belongs?
>
> Uh, I'm pretty confident that nothing in my /home is owned by a UID
> under 1000, or has an ACL referencing such a UID. I just checked with
> myself and I don't want you creating directories in /home.
This is retarded, stop wasting my time.
>>>
>>> I mean, would it kill you to just talk to QA first?
>>
>> I've already got responses from two QA members. This thread is pretty
>> hard to miss.
>
> Well, then why go posting stuff like "guess we'll be triggering a
> warning after all?"
If these two things are logically connected, I don't see it.
>
>> I'm working on a patch for the install-qa-check.d check
>> and I'm sure I'll get more when I post it.
>
> Are you just allowing it to not create the directory, or are we
> considering patching it to allow creating stuff under /home? It would
> seem that the policy would also need updating in that case, but
> probably not the former.
>
The patch will make an exception for acct-user packages only; for /home,
/home/${PN}, and /home/${PN}/.keep*. In other words, it makes things
work exactly how they did before the GLEP81 eclass started keepdir'ing
the home directory.
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2020-01-20 3:17 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 29+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2020-01-18 17:51 [gentoo-dev] GLEP81 and /home Michael Orlitzky
2020-01-18 18:10 ` Ulrich Mueller
2020-01-18 23:38 ` Michael Orlitzky
2020-01-19 0:21 ` Rich Freeman
2020-01-19 2:50 ` Michael Orlitzky
2020-01-19 11:29 ` Rich Freeman
2020-01-19 15:49 ` Michael Orlitzky
2020-01-19 17:42 ` Rich Freeman
2020-01-19 18:37 ` Michael Orlitzky
2020-01-19 19:02 ` Rich Freeman
2020-01-19 19:27 ` Michael Orlitzky
2020-01-19 19:47 ` Rich Freeman
2020-01-19 21:00 ` Michael Orlitzky
2020-01-19 22:09 ` Michael Orlitzky
2020-01-20 1:20 ` Rich Freeman
2020-01-20 1:51 ` Michael Orlitzky
2020-01-20 2:52 ` Rich Freeman
2020-01-20 3:16 ` Michael Orlitzky [this message]
2020-01-20 3:40 ` Rich Freeman
2020-01-20 3:57 ` Michael Orlitzky
2020-01-19 19:37 ` Robin H. Johnson
2020-01-19 19:19 ` Alec Warner
2020-01-19 19:28 ` Michael Orlitzky
2020-01-19 19:32 ` Alec Warner
2020-01-19 20:44 ` Michael Orlitzky
2020-01-18 19:03 ` Alec Warner
2020-01-18 20:16 ` Michael Orlitzky
2020-01-18 19:08 ` Michał Górny
2020-01-18 19:44 ` Michael Orlitzky
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=7d1e608a-66e5-d026-7057-9acc227381fb@gentoo.org \
--to=mjo@gentoo.org \
--cc=gentoo-dev@lists.gentoo.org \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox