public inbox for gentoo-dev@lists.gentoo.org
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: "Michał Górny" <mgorny@gentoo.org>
To: gentoo-dev@lists.gentoo.org, net-mail@gentoo.org
Subject: Re: [gentoo-dev] What is the source for https://dev.gentoo.org/~hollow/distfiles/genqmail-*
Date: Thu, 10 Oct 2019 14:16:21 +0200	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <7c7759a24cf550462a2be8ed65053fdf6627c4d2.camel@gentoo.org> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <7519216.COF0g6uIjq@daneel.sf-tec.de>

[-- Attachment #1: Type: text/plain, Size: 1820 bytes --]

On Thu, 2019-10-10 at 12:31 +0200, Rolf Eike Beer wrote:
> Am Donnerstag, 10. Oktober 2019, 12:15:09 CEST schrieb Michał Górny:
> > Dnia October 10, 2019 9:39:38 AM UTC, Rolf Eike Beer <eike@sf-mail.de> 
> napisał(a):
> > > Am Samstag, 21. September 2019, 10:50:07 CEST schrieb Rolf Eike Beer:
> > > > Hi,
> > > > 
> > > > I'm planning to do some cleanups to the qmail stuff. One thing s that the
> > > > genqmail tarball is from 20080406 and needs to be patched itself, which
> > > > makes things complicated. So, does anyone know what was the source of
> > > > these tarballs? I can't look into the directory, maybe there are even
> > > > older ones?
> > > > Otherwise I would propose to just start a new git repo for that and do a
> > > > new snapshot with the patches already incorporated.
> > > 
> > > So I guess noone knows. Can someone assist me in creating a new upstream? I
> > > have created a new git repository with the original tarball and the 2 
> > > existing patches, which can be found here: 
> > > https://github.com/DerDakon/genqmail
> > > 
> > > Please pick this up and move it somewhere into Gentoo git infrastructure. I
> > > can transfer ownership to the Github Gentoo organization if you would like.
> > > Afterwards I just need someone to push the button and create a new snapshot
> > > from that (preferably together with a git tag).
> > 
> > Is there really a reason to do that? Since you're maintaining it, just keep
> > it on your gh.
> 
> I just want to prevent that the same thing happens again.
> 

I don't see a difference between a stale repo on your GitHub account
and a stale repo on Gentoo Infra.  Except the former is easy to fork,
and the latter we have in dozens, and nobody knows what to do with them.

-- 
Best regards,
Michał Górny


[-- Attachment #2: This is a digitally signed message part --]
[-- Type: application/pgp-signature, Size: 618 bytes --]

  reply	other threads:[~2019-10-10 12:16 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 7+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2019-09-21  8:50 [gentoo-dev] What is the source for https://dev.gentoo.org/~hollow/distfiles/genqmail-* Rolf Eike Beer
2019-10-10  9:39 ` Rolf Eike Beer
2019-10-10 10:15   ` Michał Górny
2019-10-10 10:31     ` Rolf Eike Beer
2019-10-10 12:16       ` Michał Górny [this message]
2019-10-10 12:48         ` Rolf Eike Beer
2019-10-10 12:55           ` Michał Górny

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=7c7759a24cf550462a2be8ed65053fdf6627c4d2.camel@gentoo.org \
    --to=mgorny@gentoo.org \
    --cc=gentoo-dev@lists.gentoo.org \
    --cc=net-mail@gentoo.org \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox