From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970
Received: from pigeon.gentoo.org ([208.92.234.80] helo=lists.gentoo.org)
by finch.gentoo.org with esmtp (Exim 4.60)
(envelope-from <gentoo-dev+bounces-39027-garchives=archives.gentoo.org@lists.gentoo.org>)
id 1NT2M1-0005BN-32
for garchives@archives.gentoo.org; Fri, 08 Jan 2010 00:05:25 +0000
Received: from pigeon.gentoo.org (localhost [127.0.0.1])
by pigeon.gentoo.org (Postfix) with SMTP id A0217E0B2A
for <garchives@archives.gentoo.org>; Fri, 8 Jan 2010 00:05:24 +0000 (UTC)
Received: from smtp.gentoo.org (smtp.gentoo.org [140.211.166.183])
by pigeon.gentoo.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id B2C09E0A44
for <gentoo-dev@lists.gentoo.org>; Thu, 7 Jan 2010 22:59:08 +0000 (UTC)
Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1])
by smtp.gentoo.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 532401B4010
for <gentoo-dev@lists.gentoo.org>; Thu, 7 Jan 2010 22:59:08 +0000 (UTC)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at gentoo.org
X-Spam-Score: -1.76
X-Spam-Level:
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-1.76 required=5.5 tests=[AWL=0.839, BAYES_00=-2.599]
Received: from smtp.gentoo.org ([127.0.0.1])
by localhost (smtp.gentoo.org [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024)
with ESMTP id ywKC4JMlJIA3 for <gentoo-dev@lists.gentoo.org>;
Thu, 7 Jan 2010 22:59:01 +0000 (UTC)
Received: from ey-out-1920.google.com (ey-out-1920.google.com [74.125.78.149])
by smtp.gentoo.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 83AC81B40F2
for <gentoo-dev@gentoo.org>; Thu, 7 Jan 2010 22:59:01 +0000 (UTC)
Received: by ey-out-1920.google.com with SMTP id 26so4731959eyw.2
for <gentoo-dev@gentoo.org>; Thu, 07 Jan 2010 14:59:00 -0800 (PST)
DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed;
d=gmail.com; s=gamma;
h=domainkey-signature:mime-version:sender:received:in-reply-to
:references:date:x-google-sender-auth:message-id:subject:from:to
:content-type;
bh=/bFzvLqYiLyBBkNSbc7eJZym71oivE3AN+FOwc9jdv4=;
b=qA1q7SEt7E535h5QF86uD4WbKIpJjjEjA35Ms9hUkUmgpfZhnoFE+mmh5a3FDG83fT
pufAoWneuKkZs1IaUMAZUamqqZQbPqIlLggklGhIFqf4M0rg8oNu4UpEKk8dBSYO8+Di
FtsEg2jllNI6TC2zLYGRZhANDHgjmsPjTF9gA=
DomainKey-Signature: a=rsa-sha1; c=nofws;
d=gmail.com; s=gamma;
h=mime-version:sender:in-reply-to:references:date
:x-google-sender-auth:message-id:subject:from:to:content-type;
b=nygcipI3mpB795X5KfYnFhpS10PA+OtgQfI4QuJFX6HqzvJfRhV6yO/q7hVbGyPrG+
qcQkSsq3X5UruCxbbazMgCgZ10U2wRJKBkCtabcrBXqMAUOy3iWATxDaZf7lPkpYtGzW
Q6jqtJkfDSZOAclZh36TM0KM/jD28QSEPnsu4=
Precedence: bulk
List-Post: <mailto:gentoo-dev@lists.gentoo.org>
List-Help: <mailto:gentoo-dev+help@lists.gentoo.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <mailto:gentoo-dev+unsubscribe@lists.gentoo.org>
List-Subscribe: <mailto:gentoo-dev+subscribe@lists.gentoo.org>
List-Id: Gentoo Linux mail <gentoo-dev.gentoo.org>
X-BeenThere: gentoo-dev@lists.gentoo.org
Reply-to: gentoo-dev@lists.gentoo.org
MIME-Version: 1.0
Sender: denis.dupeyron@gmail.com
Received: by 10.216.85.132 with SMTP id u4mr1741687wee.191.1262905140282; Thu,
07 Jan 2010 14:59:00 -0800 (PST)
In-Reply-To: <1262456465.15166.3.camel@localhost.localdomain>
References: <20100101183144.457D1642DC@smtp.gentoo.org>
<1262456465.15166.3.camel@localhost.localdomain>
Date: Thu, 7 Jan 2010 15:59:00 -0700
X-Google-Sender-Auth: 0007d3e23501aec8
Message-ID: <7c612fc61001071459g3ec69283oa78eeccd9975c0ec@mail.gmail.com>
Subject: Re: [gentoo-dev] Monthly Gentoo Council Reminder for January
From: Denis Dupeyron <calchan@gentoo.org>
To: gentoo-dev@lists.gentoo.org
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1
X-Archives-Salt: 7caa9c81-4440-4669-80e4-cb9336bcad14
X-Archives-Hash: e723ac5c8daff96fa38692e8aef13824
2010/1/2 Pacho Ramos <pacho@condmat1.ciencias.uniovi.es>:
> [...] I failed to see if, finally, an approval
> from the council is needed for merging [multilib] to portage-2.2 or not
The only approval that's required to merge anything to an official
portage branch is Zac's (zmedico). He may have to follow some rules
and wait for some vote from the council when for example EAPIs are
concerned but whether to merge code or not is his decision and
responsibility. That said I've never seen him refusing to merge
anything that was worth it.
> if [multilib] will be discussed finally on this meeting.
Technically we don't need to (I'll explain that in another email) but
we may. I'm just starting to work on the agenda for the 18th and I
don't have everything in place yet.
Denis.