From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Received: from pigeon.gentoo.org ([208.92.234.80] helo=lists.gentoo.org) by finch.gentoo.org with esmtp (Exim 4.60) (envelope-from ) id 1N828b-00084b-PL for garchives@archives.gentoo.org; Wed, 11 Nov 2009 01:36:46 +0000 Received: from pigeon.gentoo.org (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by pigeon.gentoo.org (Postfix) with SMTP id 6AA9BE0ABC; Wed, 11 Nov 2009 01:36:44 +0000 (UTC) Received: from smtp.gentoo.org (smtp.gentoo.org [140.211.166.183]) by pigeon.gentoo.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 44AA0E0ABC for ; Wed, 11 Nov 2009 01:36:44 +0000 (UTC) Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by smtp.gentoo.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id EAB0F67CED for ; Wed, 11 Nov 2009 01:36:43 +0000 (UTC) X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at gentoo.org X-Spam-Score: -0.757 X-Spam-Level: X-Spam-Status: No, score=-0.757 required=5.5 tests=[AWL=-0.572, BAYES_40=-0.185] Received: from smtp.gentoo.org ([127.0.0.1]) by localhost (smtp.gentoo.org [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id H4HBQm9V4XMZ for ; Wed, 11 Nov 2009 01:36:37 +0000 (UTC) Received: from mail-ew0-f216.google.com (mail-ew0-f216.google.com [209.85.219.216]) by smtp.gentoo.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 03B6D67CD2 for ; Wed, 11 Nov 2009 01:36:35 +0000 (UTC) Received: by ewy12 with SMTP id 12so719763ewy.0 for ; Tue, 10 Nov 2009 17:36:34 -0800 (PST) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=gmail.com; s=gamma; h=domainkey-signature:mime-version:sender:received:in-reply-to :references:date:x-google-sender-auth:message-id:subject:from:to :content-type; bh=Affl8FeAmiRHJMyy3Nss30D+q0L9ow+7lvj6rVZJaTg=; b=JXfY+OWyMaIKS4FOlEe2w9QgZ+19g74KD6dDVr5xuObYK41UUAoA0CGlpACwthTr74 qnlhj0LvdbQnjmHtiU+p9xDslBqyypC6pN8wZcSZ46iBfOFsy/K52bVcjZh8Yq1rjXqK x4akKkMYK+s7Jxvbf8xajeItMHKI3y4swS31k= DomainKey-Signature: a=rsa-sha1; c=nofws; d=gmail.com; s=gamma; h=mime-version:sender:in-reply-to:references:date :x-google-sender-auth:message-id:subject:from:to:content-type; b=gzOx1noa+oFDbbd5oBBrhDCrcHDOfaXGADiT6PuDH0bYRrqcGXSo+Ps3czXNFQbGbW s+3jcoXkRVKSB2nj556mun+v2fgPgA6OjprUkeyh//SNfU+KzFuK1DWpv7EEe9mVig8s hOOuLwL5NwfFHKHbQP8p+Dk9y5cEC6uR7p+bg= Precedence: bulk List-Post: List-Help: List-Unsubscribe: List-Subscribe: List-Id: Gentoo Linux mail X-BeenThere: gentoo-dev@lists.gentoo.org Reply-to: gentoo-dev@lists.gentoo.org MIME-Version: 1.0 Sender: denis.dupeyron@gmail.com Received: by 10.216.93.69 with SMTP id k47mr270960wef.179.1257903394804; Tue, 10 Nov 2009 17:36:34 -0800 (PST) In-Reply-To: <4AF9E5D1.2080806@gentoo.org> References: <4AF9E5D1.2080806@gentoo.org> Date: Tue, 10 Nov 2009 18:36:34 -0700 X-Google-Sender-Auth: f396952292eecc13 Message-ID: <7c612fc60911101736r6451e1b9gfdcbcd98f6f8c72d@mail.gmail.com> Subject: Re: [gentoo-dev] Removing kde-base/arts from tree. From: Denis Dupeyron To: gentoo-dev@lists.gentoo.org Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1 X-Archives-Salt: 02c42464-5a45-4a26-947d-bf9ed4935e1c X-Archives-Hash: 21780e663e17e586cb0885ecac312f80 On Tue, Nov 10, 2009 at 3:14 PM, Samuli Suominen wrote: > I'm tempted to say "otherwise it will be hardmasked with kde-base/arts > by the end of this week", but that might be too intimidating for some. And completely unreasonable. Some of us have a life. Denis, wondering why the hurry.