From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Received: from pigeon.gentoo.org ([208.92.234.80] helo=lists.gentoo.org) by finch.gentoo.org with esmtp (Exim 4.60) (envelope-from ) id 1MKBH5-0002H5-12 for garchives@archives.gentoo.org; Fri, 26 Jun 2009 13:15:27 +0000 Received: from pigeon.gentoo.org (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by pigeon.gentoo.org (Postfix) with SMTP id DE4B5E02FA; Fri, 26 Jun 2009 13:15:25 +0000 (UTC) Received: from mail-ew0-f211.google.com (mail-ew0-f211.google.com [209.85.219.211]) by pigeon.gentoo.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id A4C11E02FA for ; Fri, 26 Jun 2009 13:15:25 +0000 (UTC) Received: by ewy7 with SMTP id 7so2976613ewy.34 for ; Fri, 26 Jun 2009 06:15:25 -0700 (PDT) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=gmail.com; s=gamma; h=domainkey-signature:mime-version:sender:received:in-reply-to :references:date:x-google-sender-auth:message-id:subject:from:to :content-type:content-transfer-encoding; bh=VcU2ul4EVZ5rFDZV0NDk8Y/eCyllcib+mi4+X4m3PMQ=; b=wz6FOVlCQ3cCK7sZ69tWfVXqGcRt3g3HMCUeMq8FGCYQkgJCP0+xBW263Ow2g27EpE WjpPrfpp7Wkfc0RNg/gGzCf6uCWg/lHBOOxjgE5oNZXfn1vYblg9p3k3P01koXNqcfaK IXOtgkLp79ctfrvreUW4+kAViOtgguLJOn9Uc= DomainKey-Signature: a=rsa-sha1; c=nofws; d=gmail.com; s=gamma; h=mime-version:sender:in-reply-to:references:date :x-google-sender-auth:message-id:subject:from:to:content-type :content-transfer-encoding; b=q4skZ727AqTaQSrMUK0iSIzNi7h4nee7dULtNLYcNsPpjroR2Rm7yUk5p+sV5CO30f FX9L1IdSXN7dM9U6GNA98kQ7XZLlMsyq1H602s5gJSLgRDrdtZJo5IKpU9+w3SCrz6EZ 01eNiad1X3YWh7+B3rCrI5IEqB8cPq1ZZtpPc= Precedence: bulk List-Post: List-Help: List-Unsubscribe: List-Subscribe: List-Id: Gentoo Linux mail X-BeenThere: gentoo-dev@lists.gentoo.org Reply-to: gentoo-dev@lists.gentoo.org MIME-Version: 1.0 Sender: denis.dupeyron@gmail.com Received: by 10.216.29.201 with SMTP id i51mr1143836wea.214.1246022124839; Fri, 26 Jun 2009 06:15:24 -0700 (PDT) In-Reply-To: <4A44C339.4050303@gentoo.org> References: <200906252100.52295.wk@mailstation.de> <4A44C339.4050303@gentoo.org> Date: Fri, 26 Jun 2009 07:15:24 -0600 X-Google-Sender-Auth: 0b68ce0d2f327e00 Message-ID: <7c612fc60906260615l7b256d05mffd6f25148aa34d6@mail.gmail.com> Subject: Re: [gentoo-dev] 2009 Council Elections From: Denis Dupeyron To: gentoo-dev@lists.gentoo.org Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-Archives-Salt: d9b3f0c8-a6c9-4dfa-bb75-417931c415a3 X-Archives-Hash: a0eee62d92b6b20606abdd0c2ec1ee08 On Fri, Jun 26, 2009 at 6:46 AM, Ben de Groot wrote: > To appoint as proxy for a council meeting someone who has been booted > from Gentoo is a clear lapse of judgement, and would in my eyes > disqualify the involved council member from functioning in that position. As Petteri noted it's not obvious that GLEP39 disallows choosing a non-dev as proxy for a council meeting. I haven't talked to Tiziano, and I don't know what he had in mind when he chose ciaranm as his proxy, but I'd be ready to believe part of it was that he wanted to experiment. And experiments sometimes succeed, or sometimes they fail, but they often teach you something. I wouldn't be as fast as you to remove Tiziano from the list of people I'd vote for. Denis.