From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Received: from pigeon.gentoo.org ([69.77.167.62] helo=lists.gentoo.org) by finch.gentoo.org with esmtp (Exim 4.60) (envelope-from <gentoo-dev+bounces-31381-garchives=archives.gentoo.org@lists.gentoo.org>) id 1K6i6Y-00020h-Pj for garchives@archives.gentoo.org; Thu, 12 Jun 2008 08:24:23 +0000 Received: from pigeon.gentoo.org (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by pigeon.gentoo.org (Postfix) with SMTP id 80D43E0529; Thu, 12 Jun 2008 08:24:21 +0000 (UTC) Received: from smtp.gentoo.org (smtp.gentoo.org [140.211.166.183]) by pigeon.gentoo.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 582B4E0529 for <gentoo-dev@lists.gentoo.org>; Thu, 12 Jun 2008 08:24:21 +0000 (UTC) Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by smtp.gentoo.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id C0F4F676CF for <gentoo-dev@lists.gentoo.org>; Thu, 12 Jun 2008 08:24:20 +0000 (UTC) X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at gentoo.org X-Spam-Score: -1.814 X-Spam-Level: X-Spam-Status: No, score=-1.814 required=5.5 tests=[AWL=0.785, BAYES_00=-2.599] Received: from smtp.gentoo.org ([127.0.0.1]) by localhost (smtp.gentoo.org [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id HLV0jSphRxCA for <gentoo-dev@lists.gentoo.org>; Thu, 12 Jun 2008 08:24:14 +0000 (UTC) Received: from wa-out-1112.google.com (wa-out-1112.google.com [209.85.146.181]) by smtp.gentoo.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 873E86766A for <gentoo-dev@gentoo.org>; Thu, 12 Jun 2008 08:24:14 +0000 (UTC) Received: by wa-out-1112.google.com with SMTP id v33so2613723wah.24 for <gentoo-dev@gentoo.org>; Thu, 12 Jun 2008 01:24:14 -0700 (PDT) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=gmail.com; s=gamma; h=domainkey-signature:received:received:message-id:date:from:sender :to:subject:in-reply-to:mime-version:content-type :content-transfer-encoding:content-disposition:references :x-google-sender-auth; bh=/JsbCZPDn+Lek0fLEncUZlB+PVGPk/XEabm0p8Fxjqs=; b=SZi/MyyfuD0tlSf39wsFUugnPuEu3dtuTrMDokTdl/D4Lapz4l4Tgd1tEuqjtLwiRC G4MRC4az41EVQkedKWd1jzwRV5/eJRmeS6vs7qvtIGUfurR6weqL2Z/h6qS4okW+fYmB JcEjmIw4I9wfli3ZzV6V1kvTI8ogasY0bUiQ0= DomainKey-Signature: a=rsa-sha1; c=nofws; d=gmail.com; s=gamma; h=message-id:date:from:sender:to:subject:in-reply-to:mime-version :content-type:content-transfer-encoding:content-disposition :references:x-google-sender-auth; b=K4DizCxJAUQZDqa3dkGtOoqZVgr6EgqAwq6eGa8EoTxPh+d2KlWr73irah8XAOS+c4 a63iInvWURxVk1yW2kqgaU8hTBTlUr7V9pqZT7j8+inXXrDMu0lY0HY5HMPJF7b/yFyE ZMIayLSsaLfrqGRh5jkN+1QuPbkL9ACUiXEEA= Received: by 10.115.19.19 with SMTP id w19mr1035888wai.195.1213259054199; Thu, 12 Jun 2008 01:24:14 -0700 (PDT) Received: by 10.114.153.6 with HTTP; Thu, 12 Jun 2008 01:24:14 -0700 (PDT) Message-ID: <7c612fc60806120124g75a9d269la5c8e9a20d49ca2a@mail.gmail.com> Date: Thu, 12 Jun 2008 10:24:14 +0200 From: "Denis Dupeyron" <calchan@gentoo.org> Sender: denis.dupeyron@gmail.com To: gentoo-dev@lists.gentoo.org Subject: Re: [gentoo-dev] Re: Agenda [WAS: One-Day Gentoo Council Reminder for June] In-Reply-To: <20080612091651.1cec6558@googlemail.com> Precedence: bulk List-Post: <mailto:gentoo-dev@lists.gentoo.org> List-Help: <mailto:gentoo-dev+help@lists.gentoo.org> List-Unsubscribe: <mailto:gentoo-dev+unsubscribe@lists.gentoo.org> List-Subscribe: <mailto:gentoo-dev+subscribe@lists.gentoo.org> List-Id: Gentoo Linux mail <gentoo-dev.gentoo.org> X-BeenThere: gentoo-dev@lists.gentoo.org Reply-to: gentoo-dev@lists.gentoo.org MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Content-Disposition: inline References: <20080611070618.54E4066E24@smtp.gentoo.org> <20080611215827.GB7074@comet> <g2qjln$fji$1@ger.gmane.org> <20080612084128.7221bb09@googlemail.com> <4850D5AD.2090108@gentoo.org> <20080612090136.43f0beac@googlemail.com> <4850DA7F.7030406@gentoo.org> <20080612091651.1cec6558@googlemail.com> X-Google-Sender-Auth: 15fbf948e4007551 X-Archives-Salt: 6a83b6f7-7aa6-455a-84ec-eaefd57e4f32 X-Archives-Hash: f9860458eb105395cd0ce93490173212 On Thu, Jun 12, 2008 at 10:16 AM, Ciaran McCreesh <ciaran.mccreesh@googlemail.com> wrote: > Are you seriously suggesting that the portage and pkgcore developers > think that they should be able to release a package manager that claims > to support an EAPI when it in fact doesn't? Please stop your incessant and gratuitous insinuations. Denis. -- gentoo-dev@lists.gentoo.org mailing list