From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970
Received: from pigeon.gentoo.org ([69.77.167.62] helo=lists.gentoo.org)
by finch.gentoo.org with esmtp (Exim 4.60)
(envelope-from <gentoo-dev+bounces-31381-garchives=archives.gentoo.org@lists.gentoo.org>)
id 1K6i6Y-00020h-Pj
for garchives@archives.gentoo.org; Thu, 12 Jun 2008 08:24:23 +0000
Received: from pigeon.gentoo.org (localhost [127.0.0.1])
by pigeon.gentoo.org (Postfix) with SMTP id 80D43E0529;
Thu, 12 Jun 2008 08:24:21 +0000 (UTC)
Received: from smtp.gentoo.org (smtp.gentoo.org [140.211.166.183])
by pigeon.gentoo.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 582B4E0529
for <gentoo-dev@lists.gentoo.org>; Thu, 12 Jun 2008 08:24:21 +0000 (UTC)
Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1])
by smtp.gentoo.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id C0F4F676CF
for <gentoo-dev@lists.gentoo.org>; Thu, 12 Jun 2008 08:24:20 +0000 (UTC)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at gentoo.org
X-Spam-Score: -1.814
X-Spam-Level:
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-1.814 required=5.5 tests=[AWL=0.785,
BAYES_00=-2.599]
Received: from smtp.gentoo.org ([127.0.0.1])
by localhost (smtp.gentoo.org [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024)
with ESMTP id HLV0jSphRxCA for <gentoo-dev@lists.gentoo.org>;
Thu, 12 Jun 2008 08:24:14 +0000 (UTC)
Received: from wa-out-1112.google.com (wa-out-1112.google.com [209.85.146.181])
by smtp.gentoo.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 873E86766A
for <gentoo-dev@gentoo.org>; Thu, 12 Jun 2008 08:24:14 +0000 (UTC)
Received: by wa-out-1112.google.com with SMTP id v33so2613723wah.24
for <gentoo-dev@gentoo.org>; Thu, 12 Jun 2008 01:24:14 -0700 (PDT)
DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed;
d=gmail.com; s=gamma;
h=domainkey-signature:received:received:message-id:date:from:sender
:to:subject:in-reply-to:mime-version:content-type
:content-transfer-encoding:content-disposition:references
:x-google-sender-auth;
bh=/JsbCZPDn+Lek0fLEncUZlB+PVGPk/XEabm0p8Fxjqs=;
b=SZi/MyyfuD0tlSf39wsFUugnPuEu3dtuTrMDokTdl/D4Lapz4l4Tgd1tEuqjtLwiRC
G4MRC4az41EVQkedKWd1jzwRV5/eJRmeS6vs7qvtIGUfurR6weqL2Z/h6qS4okW+fYmB
JcEjmIw4I9wfli3ZzV6V1kvTI8ogasY0bUiQ0=
DomainKey-Signature: a=rsa-sha1; c=nofws;
d=gmail.com; s=gamma;
h=message-id:date:from:sender:to:subject:in-reply-to:mime-version
:content-type:content-transfer-encoding:content-disposition
:references:x-google-sender-auth;
b=K4DizCxJAUQZDqa3dkGtOoqZVgr6EgqAwq6eGa8EoTxPh+d2KlWr73irah8XAOS+c4
a63iInvWURxVk1yW2kqgaU8hTBTlUr7V9pqZT7j8+inXXrDMu0lY0HY5HMPJF7b/yFyE
ZMIayLSsaLfrqGRh5jkN+1QuPbkL9ACUiXEEA=
Received: by 10.115.19.19 with SMTP id w19mr1035888wai.195.1213259054199;
Thu, 12 Jun 2008 01:24:14 -0700 (PDT)
Received: by 10.114.153.6 with HTTP; Thu, 12 Jun 2008 01:24:14 -0700 (PDT)
Message-ID: <7c612fc60806120124g75a9d269la5c8e9a20d49ca2a@mail.gmail.com>
Date: Thu, 12 Jun 2008 10:24:14 +0200
From: "Denis Dupeyron" <calchan@gentoo.org>
Sender: denis.dupeyron@gmail.com
To: gentoo-dev@lists.gentoo.org
Subject: Re: [gentoo-dev] Re: Agenda [WAS: One-Day Gentoo Council Reminder for June]
In-Reply-To: <20080612091651.1cec6558@googlemail.com>
Precedence: bulk
List-Post: <mailto:gentoo-dev@lists.gentoo.org>
List-Help: <mailto:gentoo-dev+help@lists.gentoo.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <mailto:gentoo-dev+unsubscribe@lists.gentoo.org>
List-Subscribe: <mailto:gentoo-dev+subscribe@lists.gentoo.org>
List-Id: Gentoo Linux mail <gentoo-dev.gentoo.org>
X-BeenThere: gentoo-dev@lists.gentoo.org
Reply-to: gentoo-dev@lists.gentoo.org
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
Content-Disposition: inline
References: <20080611070618.54E4066E24@smtp.gentoo.org>
<20080611215827.GB7074@comet> <g2qjln$fji$1@ger.gmane.org>
<20080612084128.7221bb09@googlemail.com> <4850D5AD.2090108@gentoo.org>
<20080612090136.43f0beac@googlemail.com> <4850DA7F.7030406@gentoo.org>
<20080612091651.1cec6558@googlemail.com>
X-Google-Sender-Auth: 15fbf948e4007551
X-Archives-Salt: 6a83b6f7-7aa6-455a-84ec-eaefd57e4f32
X-Archives-Hash: f9860458eb105395cd0ce93490173212
On Thu, Jun 12, 2008 at 10:16 AM, Ciaran McCreesh
<ciaran.mccreesh@googlemail.com> wrote:
> Are you seriously suggesting that the portage and pkgcore developers
> think that they should be able to release a package manager that claims
> to support an EAPI when it in fact doesn't?
Please stop your incessant and gratuitous insinuations.
Denis.
--
gentoo-dev@lists.gentoo.org mailing list