From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970
Received: from lists.gentoo.org ([140.105.134.102] helo=robin.gentoo.org)
by nuthatch.gentoo.org with esmtp (Exim 4.67)
(envelope-from <gentoo-dev+bounces-25452-garchives=archives.gentoo.org@gentoo.org>)
id 1ICW4y-0000Tg-C9
for garchives@archives.gentoo.org; Sun, 22 Jul 2007 07:42:12 +0000
Received: from robin.gentoo.org (localhost [127.0.0.1])
by robin.gentoo.org (8.14.0/8.14.0) with SMTP id l6M7eXpC009456;
Sun, 22 Jul 2007 07:40:33 GMT
Received: from an-out-0708.google.com (an-out-0708.google.com [209.85.132.249])
by robin.gentoo.org (8.14.0/8.14.0) with ESMTP id l6M7c9RG006350
for <gentoo-dev@lists.gentoo.org>; Sun, 22 Jul 2007 07:38:10 GMT
Received: by an-out-0708.google.com with SMTP id c8so275834ana
for <gentoo-dev@lists.gentoo.org>; Sun, 22 Jul 2007 00:38:09 -0700 (PDT)
DKIM-Signature: a=rsa-sha1; c=relaxed/relaxed;
d=gmail.com; s=beta;
h=domainkey-signature:received:received:message-id:date:from:sender:to:subject:in-reply-to:mime-version:content-type:content-transfer-encoding:content-disposition:references:x-google-sender-auth;
b=QcbLeIf0jhlGd6cLnzQz1SlFYYjPAyLUENghqQGhDSb4nUonV57vv/8YB/a2HvpnLQzkXusKUff9SDEqUMyHiGx129aVVYDWXApPc/gQGoGsJd8W1cIFBXUjc8tnnS35Ou6gGTo3pr0s10Y1gaymOebtUJyyxkkvgUD60rHjd+8=
DomainKey-Signature: a=rsa-sha1; c=nofws;
d=gmail.com; s=beta;
h=received:message-id:date:from:sender:to:subject:in-reply-to:mime-version:content-type:content-transfer-encoding:content-disposition:references:x-google-sender-auth;
b=P5sq9q6vToYWhmOgP491sV510+EZx/GaEuXMF8OhKjeHaqsY1/sZZ98GFPbLdQU0YIlNFbt5JWoCpiyZTdY5TnRY8VwUSBDcOzxImShhlE91Nef2s+dMzSXm4zDwQTcPjBAkfJKbrbPmz8p0Y9tZj5Ee7aryNJuocknbxy7+m5w=
Received: by 10.100.166.14 with SMTP id o14mr1054574ane.1185089888998;
Sun, 22 Jul 2007 00:38:08 -0700 (PDT)
Received: by 10.100.197.7 with HTTP; Sun, 22 Jul 2007 00:38:08 -0700 (PDT)
Message-ID: <7c612fc60707220038p24555383ud4ef3e63fe44e8b6@mail.gmail.com>
Date: Sun, 22 Jul 2007 09:38:08 +0200
From: "Denis Dupeyron" <calchan@gentoo.org>
Sender: denis.dupeyron@gmail.com
To: gentoo-dev@lists.gentoo.org
Subject: Re: [gentoo-dev] virtual/x11 cleanups
In-Reply-To: <46A2A970.8070101@gentoo.org>
Precedence: bulk
List-Post: <mailto:gentoo-dev@lists.gentoo.org>
List-Help: <mailto:gentoo-dev+help@gentoo.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <mailto:gentoo-dev+unsubscribe@gentoo.org>
List-Subscribe: <mailto:gentoo-dev+subscribe@gentoo.org>
List-Id: Gentoo Linux mail <gentoo-dev.gentoo.org>
X-BeenThere: gentoo-dev@gentoo.org
Reply-to: gentoo-dev@lists.gentoo.org
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=UTF-8; format=flowed
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
Content-Disposition: inline
References: <46A2A970.8070101@gentoo.org>
X-Google-Sender-Auth: a62f6b6bce80c78c
X-Archives-Salt: e54f1b64-5b92-46a6-becb-ed3b277f8170
X-Archives-Hash: 5c19cca606b2f6e3321740dbce466e10
On 7/22/07, Steev Klimaszewski <steev@gentoo.org> wrote:
> Donnie wants to remove virtual/x11 (can ya blame him?) and since Josh_B
> has retired (for now! ;) ) I wanted to help Donnie out a bit, since he
> is busy and X is a massive undertaking... a "quick" grep of the tree
> excluding ChangeLog files shows 3319 occurrences of virtual/x11 still in
> the tree.
Good idea. How about using bug #168328 as a tracker or opening a new one ?
> I don't have a list as that is a lot of occurrences, so if
> you maintain something that uses X, please take a glance through your
> ebuilds and make sure they have the true package deps and perhaps help
> lighten Donnie's load.
In any case I'll handle sci-electronics and dev-embedded as usual.
Denis.
--
gentoo-dev@gentoo.org mailing list