From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970
Received: from lists.gentoo.org ([140.105.134.102] helo=robin.gentoo.org)
by nuthatch.gentoo.org with esmtp (Exim 4.62)
(envelope-from <gentoo-dev+bounces-24939-garchives=archives.gentoo.org@gentoo.org>)
id 1I96w8-0002w0-Cr
for garchives@archives.gentoo.org; Thu, 12 Jul 2007 22:15:00 +0000
Received: from robin.gentoo.org (localhost [127.0.0.1])
by robin.gentoo.org (8.14.0/8.14.0) with SMTP id l6CMDQjF014959;
Thu, 12 Jul 2007 22:13:26 GMT
Received: from an-out-0708.google.com (an-out-0708.google.com [209.85.132.249])
by robin.gentoo.org (8.14.0/8.14.0) with ESMTP id l6CMAkFd011566
for <gentoo-dev@lists.gentoo.org>; Thu, 12 Jul 2007 22:10:46 GMT
Received: by an-out-0708.google.com with SMTP id c8so66443ana
for <gentoo-dev@lists.gentoo.org>; Thu, 12 Jul 2007 15:10:45 -0700 (PDT)
DKIM-Signature: a=rsa-sha1; c=relaxed/relaxed;
d=gmail.com; s=beta;
h=domainkey-signature:received:received:message-id:date:from:sender:to:subject:in-reply-to:mime-version:content-type:content-transfer-encoding:content-disposition:references:x-google-sender-auth;
b=iB7ZU0rX4reHLJJ7I+zfY9SHUY42bXAIqXrFZf6CagHIYrlJMH1C3AEW2ck5+rSe4qVfelH7WIXMCN5DE2G2RpWRaBeUndti8QgbDaM/KanPPIXayQlQo1G8r++ZImzL+kgKt70eN6V6o6VevNrHEFFyymZ8jXDY5gTeF0mYvSA=
DomainKey-Signature: a=rsa-sha1; c=nofws;
d=gmail.com; s=beta;
h=received:message-id:date:from:sender:to:subject:in-reply-to:mime-version:content-type:content-transfer-encoding:content-disposition:references:x-google-sender-auth;
b=A9YywKDWTvxIgah91h0i0zxGz7E/t2a/bEcz46YXpp/dWt13KBVpxHy2TkFVxyBj41J7ESlRtc+Jjmxdrhe780agAZvLSfnYkiY1YUnHfnGsuz534k11DXXxJ863E28wEmDF5PVuL9TAT0CaUtri7crf2E3aLPYS4bM8nHOkTdU=
Received: by 10.100.7.18 with SMTP id 18mr600806ang.1184278245312;
Thu, 12 Jul 2007 15:10:45 -0700 (PDT)
Received: by 10.100.121.2 with HTTP; Thu, 12 Jul 2007 15:10:45 -0700 (PDT)
Message-ID: <7c612fc60707121510o520cfbe7y4036aa2c83f7280b@mail.gmail.com>
Date: Fri, 13 Jul 2007 00:10:45 +0200
From: "Denis Dupeyron" <calchan@gentoo.org>
Sender: denis.dupeyron@gmail.com
To: gentoo-dev@lists.gentoo.org
Subject: Re: [gentoo-dev] ML changes
In-Reply-To: <1184276637.26227.11.camel@localhost>
Precedence: bulk
List-Post: <mailto:gentoo-dev@lists.gentoo.org>
List-Help: <mailto:gentoo-dev+help@gentoo.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <mailto:gentoo-dev+unsubscribe@gentoo.org>
List-Subscribe: <mailto:gentoo-dev+subscribe@gentoo.org>
List-Id: Gentoo Linux mail <gentoo-dev.gentoo.org>
X-BeenThere: gentoo-dev@gentoo.org
Reply-to: gentoo-dev@lists.gentoo.org
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=UTF-8; format=flowed
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
Content-Disposition: inline
References: <46968E00.4070202@gentoo.org> <1184276637.26227.11.camel@localhost>
X-Google-Sender-Auth: 357f65dff8fb4069
X-Archives-Salt: 30950b8a-86a5-4c0e-9335-ee4d9976c128
X-Archives-Hash: 794171069779cf7459888de2f1b5365a
On 7/12/07, Seemant Kulleen <seemant@gentoo.org> wrote:
> My only comment for now is: why not just make -core read only, but
> public, and leave -dev as it is? That way we don't have to muck around
> with deprecating lists and introducing new ones.
That looks like a good idea to me if the mandatory communication
(package retirement announcements, USE flag discussions, etc...) is
moved to -core. If not, I don't see the point.
Also I still think we need a private mailing list. Whether it's used
often or not shouldn't be a metric for the decision. And if things get
leaked out as Mike says, then it's an entirely different issue that
deserves an entirely different type of resolution on a case by case
basis involving the source of the leak, not the list.
Denis.
--
gentoo-dev@gentoo.org mailing list