From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Received: from lists.gentoo.org ([140.105.134.102] helo=robin.gentoo.org) by nuthatch.gentoo.org with esmtp (Exim 4.43) id 1E776B-0007Wp-Qo for garchives@archives.gentoo.org; Mon, 22 Aug 2005 07:52:04 +0000 Received: from robin.gentoo.org (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by robin.gentoo.org (8.13.4/8.13.4) with SMTP id j7M7oC8n019690; Mon, 22 Aug 2005 07:50:12 GMT Received: from cmailg3.svr.pol.co.uk (cmailg3.svr.pol.co.uk [195.92.195.173]) by robin.gentoo.org (8.13.4/8.13.4) with ESMTP id j7M7kgGG028588 for ; Mon, 22 Aug 2005 07:46:42 GMT Received: from user-4836.lns6-c8.dsl.pol.co.uk ([84.67.210.228] helo=[10.0.0.1]) by cmailg3.svr.pol.co.uk with esmtp (Exim 4.41) id 1E771d-0007k8-V3 for gentoo-dev@lists.gentoo.org; Mon, 22 Aug 2005 08:47:22 +0100 Date: Mon, 22 Aug 2005 08:46:53 +0100 From: Tavis Ormandy To: gentoo-dev@lists.gentoo.org Subject: Re: [gentoo-dev] Re: Fixing the TERM mess Message-ID: <7C3236ADA8D6B69461A1FF62@[10.0.0.1]> In-Reply-To: <605B5D3B660EFCD90AD3B473@[10.0.0.1]> References: <20050821220505.4efbaff2@snowdrop.home> <1124661626.13706.13.camel@sponge.fungus> <20050821231356.050432ce@snowdrop.home> <46059ce1050821154310568d72@mail.gmail.com> <20050822000800.7c366b4f@snowdrop.home> <20050822002116.GA5503@toucan.gentoo.org> <605B5D3B660EFCD90AD3B473@[10.0.0.1]> X-Mailer: Mulberry/3.1.6 (Linux/x86) Precedence: bulk List-Post: List-Help: List-Unsubscribe: List-Subscribe: List-Id: Gentoo Linux mail X-BeenThere: gentoo-dev@gentoo.org Reply-to: gentoo-dev@lists.gentoo.org MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Content-Disposition: inline X-Archives-Salt: daa8bc9b-0747-4f79-be25-a416384e9c95 X-Archives-Hash: b23b2cd32ccca08caf471f46213152e9 --On Monday, August 22, 2005 08:18:42 +0100 Tavis Ormandy wrote: > > > --On Monday, August 22, 2005 00:21:16 +0000 Renat Lumpau > wrote: > >> On Mon, Aug 22, 2005 at 12:08:00AM +0100, Ciaran McCreesh wrote: >>> Thanks. The other useful one is to see whether it does 256 colours >>> properly like real xterm does. The following bash script, when run with >>> '256' as its argument, should look the same as it does when run under >>> a real xterm. >> >> Not even close here. > > Your script produces 256 different colours here, the shades dont match > xterm's exactly, but there are definitely 256 distinct colours. Ahh, apparently it matches an old version, but they plan to update it. Tavis. -- ------------------------------------- taviso@sdf.lonestar.org | finger me for my gpg key. ------------------------------------------------------- -- gentoo-dev@gentoo.org mailing list