On 12/05/2018 14:20, Gerion Entrup wrote: > just an idea for now. But what you think about multiversion ebuilds? > Technically this could be realized with the following line in the ebuild itself: > ``` > VERSIONS=( 3.0.11 3.0.12 3.1 ) > ``` > > and the filename without version: > //.ebuild I'm wondering: if the main goal would be more code sharing between ebuilds, would something like (essentially per-package eclasses) be an option? Paweł