From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: from lists.gentoo.org (pigeon.gentoo.org [208.92.234.80]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES256-GCM-SHA384 (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by finch.gentoo.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 82A11139694 for ; Sat, 5 Aug 2017 20:13:28 +0000 (UTC) Received: from pigeon.gentoo.org (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by pigeon.gentoo.org (Postfix) with SMTP id AD12EE0CB8; Sat, 5 Aug 2017 20:13:22 +0000 (UTC) Received: from smtp.gentoo.org (smtp.gentoo.org [140.211.166.183]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES128-GCM-SHA256 (128/128 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by pigeon.gentoo.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 55503E0BE7 for ; Sat, 5 Aug 2017 20:13:22 +0000 (UTC) Received: from [192.168.1.70] (c-174-61-145-155.hsd1.wa.comcast.net [174.61.145.155]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES128-GCM-SHA256 (128/128 bits)) (No client certificate requested) (Authenticated sender: maffblaster) by smtp.gentoo.org (Postfix) with ESMTPSA id 55BDF3417CF for ; Sat, 5 Aug 2017 20:13:21 +0000 (UTC) Subject: Re: [gentoo-dev] New package neomutt To: gentoo-dev@lists.gentoo.org References: <20170731071119.jccco5q4kd3fs4xs@rubberducky.suse.de> <20170731095558.GD820@gentoo.org> <20170731105251.GG1848@gentoo.org> From: Matthew Marchese Organization: Gentoo Linux Message-ID: <791bf834-dca8-2fa6-8dae-f7ef4a6e8389@gentoo.org> Date: Sat, 5 Aug 2017 13:13:18 -0700 User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (X11; Linux x86_64; rv:52.0) Gecko/20100101 Thunderbird/52.2.0 Precedence: bulk List-Post: List-Help: List-Unsubscribe: List-Subscribe: List-Id: Gentoo Linux mail X-BeenThere: gentoo-dev@lists.gentoo.org Reply-to: gentoo-dev@lists.gentoo.org MIME-Version: 1.0 In-Reply-To: <20170731105251.GG1848@gentoo.org> Content-Type: multipart/signed; micalg=pgp-sha512; protocol="application/pgp-signature"; boundary="mF5AVLDRsbi159DNOlxn4EubKQHjKGUlg" X-Archives-Salt: 9c062d3d-22c4-49ee-8f1e-4f1299e0d1bb X-Archives-Hash: 32f5c6096d55fb448e00ad3fe5494724 This is an OpenPGP/MIME signed message (RFC 4880 and 3156) --mF5AVLDRsbi159DNOlxn4EubKQHjKGUlg Content-Type: multipart/mixed; boundary="qnHDr4r5AQJbkemeqxATPfxgoqu5xokkj"; protected-headers="v1" From: Matthew Marchese To: gentoo-dev@lists.gentoo.org Message-ID: <791bf834-dca8-2fa6-8dae-f7ef4a6e8389@gentoo.org> Subject: Re: [gentoo-dev] New package neomutt References: <20170731071119.jccco5q4kd3fs4xs@rubberducky.suse.de> <20170731095558.GD820@gentoo.org> <20170731105251.GG1848@gentoo.org> In-Reply-To: <20170731105251.GG1848@gentoo.org> --qnHDr4r5AQJbkemeqxATPfxgoqu5xokkj Content-Type: text/plain; charset=utf-8 Content-Language: en-US Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable On 07/31/2017 03:52 AM, Fabian Groffen wrote: > On 31-07-2017 04:55:58 -0500, Matthew Thode wrote: >> On 17-07-31 09:11:19, Nicolas Bock wrote: >>> Hi, >>> >>> I would like to add neomutt to the tree. This new package is meant=20 >>> as an alternative and not a replacement of the existing mutt=20 >>> package. >>> >>> Thanks, >>> >>> Nick >>> >>> --=20 >>> Nicolas Bock >> >> It was my understanding that neomutt was mainly mutt with a bunch of >> patches added on, from what I can see, those patches are already handl= ed >> by use flags in the mutt package itself. >> >> https://www.neomutt.org/about.html describes itself as a large set of >> feature patches and not a fork as well. Are there missing patches tha= t >> need to be added to the mutt package? >=20 > These days NeoMutt really is a fork, with a complete code-re-indent, > function name changes, etc.[1] They move fast, deviating from Mutt and= > no longer submit patches to Mutt. It remains to be seen where both > projects end up, IMO. It is no longer feasible to add features from > NeoMutt to Mutt, and Mutt moves along its own path (with > features/improvements) as well. >=20 > For now it seems useful to me to have both mutt and neomutt around. I > sent my detailed comments on the neomutt ebuild to Nicholas off-list > already. The changes suggested should show even more how the two are > different. >=20 > Thanks, > Fabian >=20 > [1] http://mailman.neomutt.org/pipermail/neomutt-devel-neomutt.org/2017= -April/000364.html >=20 I second Fabians input here. Two packages are necessary. --qnHDr4r5AQJbkemeqxATPfxgoqu5xokkj-- --mF5AVLDRsbi159DNOlxn4EubKQHjKGUlg Content-Type: application/pgp-signature; name="signature.asc" Content-Description: OpenPGP digital signature Content-Disposition: attachment; filename="signature.asc" -----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE----- iQJLBAEBCgA1FiEEdxFywPzSyPkzxNJGAWfS0cOIkXwFAlmGJt8XHG1hZmZibGFz dGVyQGdlbnRvby5vcmcACgkQAWfS0cOIkXzDZA/+PxsufIZGbzevgHNSh86HN3Hr nZoNOKc4RepcB1LeQJA0W3pvyl9eSGPS+N8WPzu1XG5tRWOm2EcXY14k8ZcdA20B Q0JPutYU2KdukbJH9daEk1R5wn1FIkV28ZNYh+ozF1ReEZ7w7wdtLsHC9sswijam h2lhWwY2lRgJC13VdxFUN7KMys1G5yE0fkeOprSvkGX/r/PD9ZwonepXjCNEX3XY k5TJA7K25CJykmoQD9eygNzx6Iiw948fjDAn+9TUGvvHpvDXjzIeB5sL/TvvXeIg Hm+vb+qE8gWpnHKpdU0p1Wndrq5MVDe2fyTWEJrPaAjEWtgHJzUUc1i52d1z4EVX GFb56GW826s1nSZ6srDGYWw39eaaCGigG5Eyo5Yy9MKWWkBEf3lz9EgS6IKC3dF9 K05WMa0TldYM/EQHsHtLofPAraVt0A72yEag5UXQjc09nNI6fdU8fGnuxMFSpt9L rS7kUkfW4ubWEuDBjG2y3jUYlu1u0wkkSlyqoWGzjb0WRgfvmY/QuZU+09oOoPo6 86V3qwjt7oJ8UXivRopdY6zrU4oAG7OqZRxhbZ179xr2VlTs4kbj/MbvNVRQqXWy O9A/vzol1e2XHBehpM5ce4l7FRKdysdeES6MBrVIvrO6WotTegHvyWo41YNFto/Q U5zP6QeqHUlQr1Y281Y= =gLz1 -----END PGP SIGNATURE----- --mF5AVLDRsbi159DNOlxn4EubKQHjKGUlg--