Re: [gentoo-dev] Package stabilization groups

[Arthur Zamarin <arthurzam@gentoo.org>]

[-- Attachment #1.1: Type: text/plain, Size: 864 bytes --]

On 17/07/2023 16.50, Matt Turner wrote:
> On Sun, Jul 16, 2023 at 2:04 PM Arthur Zamarin <arthurzam@gentoo.org> wrote:
>> Now I'll speak from the point of implementer of `pkgdev bugs`. For me I
>> think both approaches are good, but I would prefer the latter over the
>> former. Nicer syntax, easy cache of all groups, easier to solve the
>> "graph problems" in the tool.
> 
> Sounds good to me. Should we have infra create a new git repo for us
> for this purpose?
> 

No. I think it should go under normal git repo, and not separate repo. I
see no gains from it being under separate repository, only headache (how
to sync between them).

I think a main index files under
"/metadata/${some_good_name}/${group_name}" would be best.

-- 
Arthur Zamarin
arthurzam@gentoo.org
Gentoo Linux developer (Python, pkgcore stack, Arch Teams, GURU)


[-- Attachment #2: OpenPGP digital signature --]
[-- Type: application/pgp-signature, Size: 488 bytes --]