From mboxrd@z Thu Jan  1 00:00:00 1970
Received: from lists.gentoo.org ([140.105.134.102] helo=robin.gentoo.org)
	by nuthatch.gentoo.org with esmtp (Exim 4.60)
	(envelope-from <gentoo-dev+bounces-14988-garchives=archives.gentoo.org@gentoo.org>)
	id 1G1BE2-0008Fj-Ol
	for garchives@archives.gentoo.org; Fri, 14 Jul 2006 00:08:11 +0000
Received: from robin.gentoo.org (localhost [127.0.0.1])
	by robin.gentoo.org (8.13.7/8.13.6) with SMTP id k6E068if001349;
	Fri, 14 Jul 2006 00:06:08 GMT
Received: from smtp.gentoo.org (smtp.gentoo.org [140.211.166.183])
	by robin.gentoo.org (8.13.7/8.13.6) with ESMTP id k6E023Z0001726
	for <gentoo-dev@lists.gentoo.org>; Fri, 14 Jul 2006 00:02:04 GMT
Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1])
	by smtp.gentoo.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 5879E645B4
	for <gentoo-dev@lists.gentoo.org>; Fri, 14 Jul 2006 00:02:03 +0000 (UTC)
Received: from smtp.gentoo.org ([127.0.0.1])
 by localhost (smtp.gentoo.org [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024)
 with ESMTP id 11904-07 for <gentoo-dev@lists.gentoo.org>;
 Fri, 14 Jul 2006 00:02:02 +0000 (UTC)
Received: from py-out-1112.google.com (py-out-1112.google.com [64.233.166.181])
	by smtp.gentoo.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 2702B6460B
	for <gentoo-dev@gentoo.org>; Fri, 14 Jul 2006 00:02:01 +0000 (UTC)
Received: by py-out-1112.google.com with SMTP id b29so449571pya
        for <gentoo-dev@gentoo.org>; Thu, 13 Jul 2006 17:02:01 -0700 (PDT)
DomainKey-Signature: a=rsa-sha1; q=dns; c=nofws;
        s=beta; d=gmail.com;
        h=received:message-id:date:from:to:subject:mime-version:content-type;
        b=nOI8tm4Y5fC2KdR9glHcUxKFKGjqxjGyRaLvWLLmWViceEX/j+IM7VFWcKmdCbQYe6qlxyVl4YfHdD8nWE5dTeUnfiqo2Z4AuMZ1jTIwr9PZrOatKP6mgGkCdecpQLBvldniIkFEGrZEANOMKYhZJ6vPLQTgi87goEWwsLmvR3Y=
Received: by 10.35.121.9 with SMTP id y9mr1222416pym;
        Thu, 13 Jul 2006 17:02:01 -0700 (PDT)
Received: by 10.35.97.6 with HTTP; Thu, 13 Jul 2006 17:02:01 -0700 (PDT)
Message-ID: <782b5430607131702g6c925d09s8fed2e62fb343563@mail.gmail.com>
Date: Fri, 14 Jul 2006 01:02:01 +0100
From: "Ser Gio" <ld.fifty@gmail.com>
To: gentoo-dev@lists.gentoo.org
Subject: [gentoo-dev] 
Precedence: bulk
List-Post: <mailto:gentoo-dev@lists.gentoo.org>
List-Help: <mailto:gentoo-dev+help@gentoo.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <mailto:gentoo-dev+unsubscribe@gentoo.org>
List-Subscribe: <mailto:gentoo-dev+subscribe@gentoo.org>
List-Id: Gentoo Linux mail <gentoo-dev.gentoo.org>
X-BeenThere: gentoo-dev@gentoo.org
Reply-to: gentoo-dev@lists.gentoo.org
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: multipart/alternative; 
	boundary="----=_Part_18336_23827609.1152835321105"
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at gentoo.org
X-Spam-Status: No, score=0.897 required=5.5 tests=[AWL=1.479, BAYES_00=-2.599,
 DNS_FROM_RFC_ABUSE=0.2, HTML_MESSAGE=0.001, MISSING_SUBJECT=1.816]
X-Spam-Score: 0.897
X-Spam-Level: 
X-Archives-Salt: f6c83afd-2348-42e8-8dc4-42d20d9889ae
X-Archives-Hash: 994f9256eaa57b64d8bd0456a8eb8197

------=_Part_18336_23827609.1152835321105
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1; format=flowed
Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable
Content-Disposition: inline

On Fri, 14 Jul 2006 00:19:44 +0200
Jakub Moc <jakub@gentoo.org> wrote:

> Ser Gio wrote:
> > Hello,
> >
> > Why does x11-libs/gtk+-2.8.19 has the "X" useflag? The ebuild
> > doesn't look like it's using it.
> >
> > thanks,
> > S=E9rgio
>
> Because virtualx.eclass has it in IUSE and the ebuild inherits it.

Yes, i noticed that. But, for the enduser, the X flag in gtk+ is useless
right? So, is it a bug?

Regards,
S=E9rgio Martins

------=_Part_18336_23827609.1152835321105
Content-Type: text/html; charset=ISO-8859-1
Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable
Content-Disposition: inline

On Fri, 14 Jul 2006 00:19:44 +0200<br>Jakub Moc &lt;<a href=3D"mailto:jakub=
@gentoo.org">jakub@gentoo.org</a>&gt; wrote:<br><br>&gt; Ser Gio wrote:<br>=
&gt; &gt; Hello,<br>&gt; &gt; <br>&gt; &gt; Why does x11-libs/gtk+-2.8.19 h=
as the &quot;X&quot; useflag? The ebuild
<br>&gt; &gt; doesn't look like it's using it.<br>&gt; &gt; <br>&gt; &gt; t=
hanks,<br>&gt; &gt; S=E9rgio<br>&gt; <br>&gt; Because virtualx.eclass has i=
t in IUSE and the ebuild inherits it.<br><br>Yes, i noticed that. But, for =
the enduser, the X flag in gtk+ is useless right? So, is it a bug?
<br><br>Regards,<br>S=E9rgio Martins<br>

------=_Part_18336_23827609.1152835321105--
-- 
gentoo-dev@gentoo.org mailing list