From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Received: from lists.gentoo.org ([140.105.134.102] helo=robin.gentoo.org) by nuthatch.gentoo.org with esmtp (Exim 4.60) (envelope-from ) id 1G1BE2-0008Fj-Ol for garchives@archives.gentoo.org; Fri, 14 Jul 2006 00:08:11 +0000 Received: from robin.gentoo.org (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by robin.gentoo.org (8.13.7/8.13.6) with SMTP id k6E068if001349; Fri, 14 Jul 2006 00:06:08 GMT Received: from smtp.gentoo.org (smtp.gentoo.org [140.211.166.183]) by robin.gentoo.org (8.13.7/8.13.6) with ESMTP id k6E023Z0001726 for ; Fri, 14 Jul 2006 00:02:04 GMT Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by smtp.gentoo.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 5879E645B4 for ; Fri, 14 Jul 2006 00:02:03 +0000 (UTC) Received: from smtp.gentoo.org ([127.0.0.1]) by localhost (smtp.gentoo.org [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id 11904-07 for ; Fri, 14 Jul 2006 00:02:02 +0000 (UTC) Received: from py-out-1112.google.com (py-out-1112.google.com [64.233.166.181]) by smtp.gentoo.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 2702B6460B for ; Fri, 14 Jul 2006 00:02:01 +0000 (UTC) Received: by py-out-1112.google.com with SMTP id b29so449571pya for ; Thu, 13 Jul 2006 17:02:01 -0700 (PDT) DomainKey-Signature: a=rsa-sha1; q=dns; c=nofws; s=beta; d=gmail.com; h=received:message-id:date:from:to:subject:mime-version:content-type; b=nOI8tm4Y5fC2KdR9glHcUxKFKGjqxjGyRaLvWLLmWViceEX/j+IM7VFWcKmdCbQYe6qlxyVl4YfHdD8nWE5dTeUnfiqo2Z4AuMZ1jTIwr9PZrOatKP6mgGkCdecpQLBvldniIkFEGrZEANOMKYhZJ6vPLQTgi87goEWwsLmvR3Y= Received: by 10.35.121.9 with SMTP id y9mr1222416pym; Thu, 13 Jul 2006 17:02:01 -0700 (PDT) Received: by 10.35.97.6 with HTTP; Thu, 13 Jul 2006 17:02:01 -0700 (PDT) Message-ID: <782b5430607131702g6c925d09s8fed2e62fb343563@mail.gmail.com> Date: Fri, 14 Jul 2006 01:02:01 +0100 From: "Ser Gio" To: gentoo-dev@lists.gentoo.org Subject: [gentoo-dev] Precedence: bulk List-Post: List-Help: List-Unsubscribe: List-Subscribe: List-Id: Gentoo Linux mail X-BeenThere: gentoo-dev@gentoo.org Reply-to: gentoo-dev@lists.gentoo.org MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: multipart/alternative; boundary="----=_Part_18336_23827609.1152835321105" X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at gentoo.org X-Spam-Status: No, score=0.897 required=5.5 tests=[AWL=1.479, BAYES_00=-2.599, DNS_FROM_RFC_ABUSE=0.2, HTML_MESSAGE=0.001, MISSING_SUBJECT=1.816] X-Spam-Score: 0.897 X-Spam-Level: X-Archives-Salt: f6c83afd-2348-42e8-8dc4-42d20d9889ae X-Archives-Hash: 994f9256eaa57b64d8bd0456a8eb8197 ------=_Part_18336_23827609.1152835321105 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1; format=flowed Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable Content-Disposition: inline On Fri, 14 Jul 2006 00:19:44 +0200 Jakub Moc wrote: > Ser Gio wrote: > > Hello, > > > > Why does x11-libs/gtk+-2.8.19 has the "X" useflag? The ebuild > > doesn't look like it's using it. > > > > thanks, > > S=E9rgio > > Because virtualx.eclass has it in IUSE and the ebuild inherits it. Yes, i noticed that. But, for the enduser, the X flag in gtk+ is useless right? So, is it a bug? Regards, S=E9rgio Martins ------=_Part_18336_23827609.1152835321105 Content-Type: text/html; charset=ISO-8859-1 Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable Content-Disposition: inline On Fri, 14 Jul 2006 00:19:44 +0200
Jakub Moc <jakub@gentoo.org> wrote:

> Ser Gio wrote:
= > > Hello,
> >
> > Why does x11-libs/gtk+-2.8.19 h= as the "X" useflag? The ebuild
> > doesn't look like it's using it.
> >
> > t= hanks,
> > S=E9rgio
>
> Because virtualx.eclass has i= t in IUSE and the ebuild inherits it.

Yes, i noticed that. But, for = the enduser, the X flag in gtk+ is useless right? So, is it a bug?

Regards,
S=E9rgio Martins
------=_Part_18336_23827609.1152835321105-- -- gentoo-dev@gentoo.org mailing list