From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: from lists.gentoo.org (pigeon.gentoo.org [208.92.234.80]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES256-GCM-SHA384 (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by finch.gentoo.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 1850E139694 for ; Thu, 27 Jul 2017 13:55:20 +0000 (UTC) Received: from pigeon.gentoo.org (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by pigeon.gentoo.org (Postfix) with SMTP id C5DD01FC08A; Thu, 27 Jul 2017 13:55:14 +0000 (UTC) Received: from smtp.gentoo.org (smtp.gentoo.org [140.211.166.183]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES128-GCM-SHA256 (128/128 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by pigeon.gentoo.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 6F1651FC053 for ; Thu, 27 Jul 2017 13:55:14 +0000 (UTC) Received: from [10.100.0.22] (host-37-191-226-104.lynet.no [37.191.226.104]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES128-GCM-SHA256 (128/128 bits)) (No client certificate requested) (Authenticated sender: k_f) by smtp.gentoo.org (Postfix) with ESMTPSA id A767F3418A2; Thu, 27 Jul 2017 13:55:11 +0000 (UTC) Subject: Re: [gentoo-dev] [RFC pre-GLEP] Gentoo Git Workflow To: gentoo-dev@lists.gentoo.org, =?UTF-8?B?TWljaGHFgiBHw7Nybnk=?= References: <1500969906.1206.1.camel@gentoo.org> <34844359-048a-3996-c2c1-3550b06123f4@gentoo.org> <1501163523.807.4.camel@gentoo.org> From: Kristian Fiskerstrand Message-ID: <769ccd85-a1a8-5d0c-e885-efaee9388a6d@gentoo.org> Date: Thu, 27 Jul 2017 15:54:56 +0200 User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (X11; Linux x86_64; rv:52.0) Gecko/20100101 Thunderbird/52.2.0 Precedence: bulk List-Post: List-Help: List-Unsubscribe: List-Subscribe: List-Id: Gentoo Linux mail X-BeenThere: gentoo-dev@lists.gentoo.org Reply-to: gentoo-dev@lists.gentoo.org MIME-Version: 1.0 In-Reply-To: <1501163523.807.4.camel@gentoo.org> Content-Type: multipart/signed; micalg=pgp-sha512; protocol="application/pgp-signature"; boundary="vRuwCe37ShwHO1DGNWdGRUTCSivd8cS2N" X-Archives-Salt: cc30b7a1-cda1-4557-85f0-1e82a182fbaf X-Archives-Hash: aadc647b79f2a698f286dd1d4500bb42 This is an OpenPGP/MIME signed message (RFC 4880 and 3156) --vRuwCe37ShwHO1DGNWdGRUTCSivd8cS2N Content-Type: multipart/mixed; boundary="4JFGXkQaJRcnefKkoeaQBwSWMHIRW5RHm"; protected-headers="v1" From: Kristian Fiskerstrand Reply-To: k_f@gentoo.org To: gentoo-dev@lists.gentoo.org, =?UTF-8?B?TWljaGHFgiBHw7Nybnk=?= Message-ID: <769ccd85-a1a8-5d0c-e885-efaee9388a6d@gentoo.org> Subject: Re: [gentoo-dev] [RFC pre-GLEP] Gentoo Git Workflow References: <1500969906.1206.1.camel@gentoo.org> <34844359-048a-3996-c2c1-3550b06123f4@gentoo.org> <1501163523.807.4.camel@gentoo.org> In-Reply-To: <1501163523.807.4.camel@gentoo.org> --4JFGXkQaJRcnefKkoeaQBwSWMHIRW5RHm Content-Type: text/plain; charset=utf-8 Content-Language: en-US Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable On 07/27/2017 03:52 PM, Micha=C5=82 G=C3=B3rny wrote: > On =C5=9Bro, 2017-07-26 at 19:17 +0200, Kristian Fiskerstrand wrote: >> On 07/25/2017 10:05 AM, Micha=C5=82 G=C3=B3rny wrote: >>> ** Fixes: https://bugs.gentoo.org/NNNNNN;= ; =E2=80=94 >>> to indicate a fixed bug, >> >> At this point fixes is overloading >>> ** Fixes: commit-id (commit message) =E2=80=94 to indicate= fixing a >>> previous commit >> >> This use should be forbidden. >=20 > ...because? But sure, you don't like it, let's remove it. Not that > anyone will actually prefer the things from the GLEP over anything else= =2E >=20 Because it overloads the tag for multiple meanings and as such should be different tags, we already have a tag that specifies the bug (namely Bug, presuming we use Reference: for URL specification of relevant upstream information or other discussions) >>> ** Bug: https://bugs.gentoo.org/NNNNNN;; = =E2=80=94 to >>> reference a bug, >> >> See other comments in thread wrt Gentoo-Bug. >> >>> ** Closes: https://github.com/gentoo/gentoo/pull/NNNN>> ki>; =E2=80=94 to automatically close a GitHub pull request, >> >> Is this a generic tag for any pull request of any platform? >=20 > No. As I've told multiple times already, there are *no* generic tags. I= t > just happens to be used by some random platforms. Some others use e.g. > 'Fixes' which you forbade. >=20 Isn't that the point of having a GLEP to begin with? Trying to standardize the use of e.g the tags so that it has a consistent meaning and can be useful? --=20 Kristian Fiskerstrand OpenPGP keyblock reachable at hkp://pool.sks-keyservers.net fpr:94CB AFDD 3034 5109 5618 35AA 0B7F 8B60 E3ED FAE3 --4JFGXkQaJRcnefKkoeaQBwSWMHIRW5RHm-- --vRuwCe37ShwHO1DGNWdGRUTCSivd8cS2N Content-Type: application/pgp-signature; name="signature.asc" Content-Description: OpenPGP digital signature Content-Disposition: attachment; filename="signature.asc" -----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE----- iQEzBAEBCgAdFiEEtOrRIMf4mkrqRycHJQt6/tY3nYUFAll58LAACgkQJQt6/tY3 nYVM8wf/W9o/8jyJsCvwzBjhzZ9vZctQRuB9o1fAggy2gWBPkDWcmiexrb4/iVZi jNUZYp8jBIdqFvCeinv0bkbC3zwWAI5ZMFsAUuUnDXeDDogi+wvmVVQY4u5LBXJS IU8VW2oRaS3LtPGbweX6YUZfeCRfDJ7LNlQ3s+ylbFcwq3yvwgjoR0SYmCHP0qmO qhBZsKnfHVXBRIrqTWt7k+a4IILyLsj+tw4WNrT1DrOFhS9fC5CNTszjz8+6eUni gsvaOADeQ5omM3UHWRGb79EEtPWGHECKV02LXDvJUsVCOW0iPLVQi6498lx5jNG0 bUDmAT0xQpo+ViRa+dkRndvQwJMtFg== =gxPE -----END PGP SIGNATURE----- --vRuwCe37ShwHO1DGNWdGRUTCSivd8cS2N--