From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: from lists.gentoo.org (pigeon.gentoo.org [208.92.234.80]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES256-GCM-SHA384 (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by finch.gentoo.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id F2200139085 for ; Fri, 27 Jan 2017 16:56:33 +0000 (UTC) Received: from pigeon.gentoo.org (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by pigeon.gentoo.org (Postfix) with SMTP id 9A087E0E97; Fri, 27 Jan 2017 16:56:16 +0000 (UTC) Received: from smtp.gentoo.org (woodpecker.gentoo.org [IPv6:2001:470:ea4a:1:5054:ff:fec7:86e4]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES256-GCM-SHA384 (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by pigeon.gentoo.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 4D1ADE0E78 for ; Fri, 27 Jan 2017 16:56:16 +0000 (UTC) Received: from [192.168.1.100] (c-98-218-46-55.hsd1.md.comcast.net [98.218.46.55]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES128-GCM-SHA256 (128/128 bits)) (No client certificate requested) (Authenticated sender: mjo) by smtp.gentoo.org (Postfix) with ESMTPSA id 722BE3415A2 for ; Fri, 27 Jan 2017 16:56:15 +0000 (UTC) Subject: Re: [gentoo-dev] berkdb and gdbm in global USE defaults To: gentoo-dev@lists.gentoo.org References: From: Michael Orlitzky Message-ID: <72eda703-f4e1-851c-ef1b-0187c98b6ad9@gentoo.org> Date: Fri, 27 Jan 2017 11:56:09 -0500 User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (X11; Linux x86_64; rv:45.0) Gecko/20100101 Thunderbird/45.6.0 Precedence: bulk List-Post: List-Help: List-Unsubscribe: List-Subscribe: List-Id: Gentoo Linux mail X-BeenThere: gentoo-dev@lists.gentoo.org Reply-to: gentoo-dev@lists.gentoo.org MIME-Version: 1.0 In-Reply-To: Content-Type: text/plain; charset=utf-8 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-Archives-Salt: d24891bb-29f8-4cfc-8909-44edaf79d70e X-Archives-Hash: b401644098643b4da02f0652eee4c5e4 On 01/26/2017 10:33 PM, Mike Gilbert wrote: > > Is there any reason to have these USE flags enabled globally? They are quite uncritical. > These USE seem pretty package-specific in scope. On my system, they > are used by around a dozen of 1000+ installed packages. I think it > might make sense to migrate them to appropriate IUSE defaults, or > leave them disabled where they do not provide critical functionality. > +1