From mboxrd@z Thu Jan  1 00:00:00 1970
Received: from pigeon.gentoo.org ([69.77.167.62] helo=lists.gentoo.org)
	by finch.gentoo.org with esmtp (Exim 4.60)
	(envelope-from <gentoo-dev+bounces-30591-garchives=archives.gentoo.org@lists.gentoo.org>)
	id 1JtlAa-0001dc-JN
	for garchives@archives.gentoo.org; Wed, 07 May 2008 15:03:00 +0000
Received: from pigeon.gentoo.org (localhost [127.0.0.1])
	by pigeon.gentoo.org (Postfix) with SMTP id 760A4E02D5;
	Wed,  7 May 2008 15:02:54 +0000 (UTC)
Received: from el-out-1112.google.com (el-out-1112.google.com [209.85.162.182])
	by pigeon.gentoo.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 524CDE02D5
	for <gentoo-dev@lists.gentoo.org>; Wed,  7 May 2008 15:02:54 +0000 (UTC)
Received: by el-out-1112.google.com with SMTP id s27so68443ele.1
        for <gentoo-dev@lists.gentoo.org>; Wed, 07 May 2008 08:02:54 -0700 (PDT)
DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed;
        d=googlemail.com; s=gamma;
        h=domainkey-signature:received:received:message-id:date:from:to:subject:in-reply-to:mime-version:content-type:content-transfer-encoding:content-disposition:references;
        bh=XU0WWiGjWD6QhemgEVwDn0VetBXgRTVOcNw0xAcbLy8=;
        b=ubOIP2AcEftD9skQKZpf+PXwTwNn1/y88qwal9jjOqXVCHszo+3ZtUGlGlj0HU89CkVuUtQhrgLwDAAq+hzLf2u5fNBrMsTBG/jaim5BMXt2fLGhZu4m1XRGYtdhxede5kqkbKOYvcXKSS5mc/6l9sxSL5wgyk1YNIgskfm1slg=
DomainKey-Signature: a=rsa-sha1; c=nofws;
        d=googlemail.com; s=gamma;
        h=message-id:date:from:to:subject:in-reply-to:mime-version:content-type:content-transfer-encoding:content-disposition:references;
        b=swe70P8M/FxASVl6RoIGAQRjbDQ+ZIdU9oTIs2NOg7pWhPy0z4uVsdeTt6nQqYdmhhRalxBHi1FJqw9EuoeR0jT4DjUMV5vsDdHPEhdxl9JyVzMHsbDBW1/nOFkRaJnCq/il+nrObzZL7xiFOCoGGcTu9FYI2FPzDedjRYTmG50=
Received: by 10.114.66.8 with SMTP id o8mr1959228waa.135.1210172573509;
        Wed, 07 May 2008 08:02:53 -0700 (PDT)
Received: by 10.114.89.20 with HTTP; Wed, 7 May 2008 08:02:53 -0700 (PDT)
Message-ID: <6faa67950805070802n43e411aci598760331f6f1256@mail.gmail.com>
Date: Wed, 7 May 2008 17:02:53 +0200
From: "Benedikt Morbach" <benedikt.morbach@googlemail.com>
To: gentoo-dev@lists.gentoo.org
Subject: Re: [gentoo-dev] RFC: lzma tarball usage
In-Reply-To: <1210166592.19574.10.camel@localhost>
Precedence: bulk
List-Post: <mailto:gentoo-dev@lists.gentoo.org>
List-Help: <mailto:gentoo-dev+help@lists.gentoo.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <mailto:gentoo-dev+unsubscribe@lists.gentoo.org>
List-Subscribe: <mailto:gentoo-dev+subscribe@lists.gentoo.org>
List-Id: Gentoo Linux mail <gentoo-dev.gentoo.org>
X-BeenThere: gentoo-dev@lists.gentoo.org
Reply-to: gentoo-dev@lists.gentoo.org
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=UTF-8
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
Content-Disposition: inline
References: <1210166592.19574.10.camel@localhost>
X-Archives-Salt: bd64b8f1-f4ae-457e-a93c-84f4f772d441
X-Archives-Hash: f3a1b4bae411a6f80ba0da912765eaa8

Hi,
I sent this to -dev to, but I think as an ordinary user I can't write there...

On Wed, May 7, 2008 at 3:23 PM, Mart Raudsepp <leio@gentoo.org> wrote:
>  I'd be happy if some other unpacker is used than lzma-utils - one that
>  does not depend on libstdc++ - I'm sure it can be done, heck it's done
>  in integrated form in some other projects in less than a couple
>  kilobytes of code for the unpacking from a VFS. Meanwhile please
>  consider using the upstream provided .tar.gz tarballs instead and not
>  roll patchsets in .lzma just cause you can.

tar-1.20 has lzma support, so maybe it could handle this too, once it
goes into stable.
-- 
gentoo-dev@lists.gentoo.org mailing list