From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970
Received: from pigeon.gentoo.org ([69.77.167.62] helo=lists.gentoo.org)
by finch.gentoo.org with esmtp (Exim 4.60)
(envelope-from <gentoo-dev+bounces-30589-garchives=archives.gentoo.org@lists.gentoo.org>)
id 1Jtl12-0000gf-Ly
for garchives@archives.gentoo.org; Wed, 07 May 2008 14:53:08 +0000
Received: from pigeon.gentoo.org (localhost [127.0.0.1])
by pigeon.gentoo.org (Postfix) with SMTP id 05075E07A2;
Wed, 7 May 2008 14:53:06 +0000 (UTC)
Received: from py-out-1112.google.com (py-out-1112.google.com [64.233.166.182])
by pigeon.gentoo.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id DE237E07A2
for <gentoo-dev@lists.gentoo.org>; Wed, 7 May 2008 14:53:05 +0000 (UTC)
Received: by py-out-1112.google.com with SMTP id w53so376070pyg.25
for <gentoo-dev@lists.gentoo.org>; Wed, 07 May 2008 07:53:05 -0700 (PDT)
DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed;
d=googlemail.com; s=gamma;
h=domainkey-signature:received:received:message-id:date:from:to:subject:in-reply-to:mime-version:content-type:content-transfer-encoding:content-disposition:references;
bh=DXjweE8tstQqL4FBu97kXhAgKo3rdehy6FeS5TlNROY=;
b=pchPE26XZ3x4VWVjT1kCd4mmnVa4/G84MvvwOIk6MzsWiKrfgMcuEGQeVyv9wPJ/C2OfTO98qenKtMg9F8tgvPhssrMIDA9pbKuybAw5Xg0g9/mgdV7LTYeapVGnji4gJWaHsdDIN7/PXhC2vVxepvJQqdn/JV+0agh38qFBUno=
DomainKey-Signature: a=rsa-sha1; c=nofws;
d=googlemail.com; s=gamma;
h=message-id:date:from:to:subject:in-reply-to:mime-version:content-type:content-transfer-encoding:content-disposition:references;
b=kyHlDIJCIVZI5B/2Yw5c55DwMmZ2W60qKiKMKVSJTq3Eu1YbwaHq+F5ZJRLmStjkBH8KWVG07umloueI7lvRCz1r1u+DJrDMYHlclcuw7bBEmO8xo2uNRBSewPmDPDYlkm+LdhT64JFvbH5zsoKwzaYP2MDbsXa3mGp1OGun4a8=
Received: by 10.115.16.1 with SMTP id t1mr1932831wai.196.1210171985190;
Wed, 07 May 2008 07:53:05 -0700 (PDT)
Received: by 10.114.89.20 with HTTP; Wed, 7 May 2008 07:53:00 -0700 (PDT)
Message-ID: <6faa67950805070753v4f1dc52o6d5eb2a677b12288@mail.gmail.com>
Date: Wed, 7 May 2008 16:53:00 +0200
From: "Benedikt Morbach" <benedikt.morbach@googlemail.com>
To: gentoo-dev@lists.gentoo.org
Subject: Re: [gentoo-dev] RFC: lzma tarball usage
In-Reply-To: <1210166592.19574.10.camel@localhost>
Precedence: bulk
List-Post: <mailto:gentoo-dev@lists.gentoo.org>
List-Help: <mailto:gentoo-dev+help@lists.gentoo.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <mailto:gentoo-dev+unsubscribe@lists.gentoo.org>
List-Subscribe: <mailto:gentoo-dev+subscribe@lists.gentoo.org>
List-Id: Gentoo Linux mail <gentoo-dev.gentoo.org>
X-BeenThere: gentoo-dev@lists.gentoo.org
Reply-to: gentoo-dev@lists.gentoo.org
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=UTF-8
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
Content-Disposition: inline
References: <1210166592.19574.10.camel@localhost>
X-Archives-Salt: 4cf5ff9e-9c04-4613-9730-80d5cb6cd756
X-Archives-Hash: 55751905f2d3aabc90aab1eb69b04df4
On Wed, May 7, 2008 at 3:23 PM, Mart Raudsepp <leio@gentoo.org> wrote:
> I'd be happy if some other unpacker is used than lzma-utils - one that
> does not depend on libstdc++ - I'm sure it can be done, heck it's done
> in integrated form in some other projects in less than a couple
> kilobytes of code for the unpacking from a VFS. Meanwhile please
> consider using the upstream provided .tar.gz tarballs instead and not
> roll patchsets in .lzma just cause you can.
tar-1.20 has lzma support, so maybe it could handle this too, once it
goes into stable
--
gentoo-dev@lists.gentoo.org mailing list