Re: [gentoo-dev] are there any lisps in the default/linux/amd64/17.0/musl profile?

[Andrey Grozin <grozin@woodpecker.gentoo.org>]

On Sun, 23 Jul 2023, Ulrich Mueller wrote:
> I think what happens is this: sbcl is masked on musl, but it is the only
> version that is enabled in the ebuild by the IUSE="+sbcl" default.
> Therefore, none of the versions available on musl is enabled there,
> resulting in an unsatisfied REQUIRED_USE.
Thank you. Probably, pkgcheck complains because of +sbcl, and sbcl is 
masked. sbcl is the best lisp for maxima on systems where it exists, 
therefore it is the default. If it does not exist, a user can try some 
other lisp. So, I'm going to continue to ignore this complaint.

By the way, I've just found (and fixed) another minor problem. Due to some 
(uninteresting) technical reasons, clozurecl in maxima ebuild is 
controlled by the use flags clozurecl (on 32-bit arches) and clozurecl64 
(on 64-bit arches). The clozurecl flag is masked in arch/base/use.mask and 
unmasked in arch/x86/use.mask (correctly). But clozurecl was not 
controlled in the same way. Now I mask it in arch/base/use.mask and unmask 
in arch/amd64/use.mask.

Andrey