From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Received: from pigeon.gentoo.org ([69.77.167.62] helo=lists.gentoo.org) by finch.gentoo.org with esmtp (Exim 4.60) (envelope-from <gentoo-dev+bounces-33024-garchives=archives.gentoo.org@lists.gentoo.org>) id 1Kmb81-0002Ip-Br for garchives@archives.gentoo.org; Sun, 05 Oct 2008 21:27:01 +0000 Received: from pigeon.gentoo.org (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by pigeon.gentoo.org (Postfix) with SMTP id 0906EE0300; Sun, 5 Oct 2008 21:27:00 +0000 (UTC) Received: from rv-out-0708.google.com (rv-out-0708.google.com [209.85.198.249]) by pigeon.gentoo.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id C4879E0300 for <gentoo-dev@lists.gentoo.org>; Sun, 5 Oct 2008 21:26:59 +0000 (UTC) Received: by rv-out-0708.google.com with SMTP id b17so2370721rvf.46 for <gentoo-dev@lists.gentoo.org>; Sun, 05 Oct 2008 14:26:58 -0700 (PDT) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=gmail.com; s=gamma; h=domainkey-signature:received:received:message-id:date:from:sender :to:subject:mime-version:content-type:content-transfer-encoding :content-disposition:x-google-sender-auth; bh=NjI7FmTJmHoCwOcM+eFCYV1/IQGt9jI60K019xti5YQ=; b=QOGi0XE+VwimlkYnqScwrh3Cov9fRgph5zXuq2yWcFIFdHhZvRCzOYVfrEk7qZudrl n7USXGR0Zm0VwtgI/0Bm5qgFV1epkAd8IOl+pmrN9u6018tegXGmm4YqbeOjENyMYA1V 2UUL3EKSAwkc/8CqlzzbGo/5DMO2/4/ekxKUw= DomainKey-Signature: a=rsa-sha1; c=nofws; d=gmail.com; s=gamma; h=message-id:date:from:sender:to:subject:mime-version:content-type :content-transfer-encoding:content-disposition:x-google-sender-auth; b=NXDppl2LETVBBtjAdqGnnEQjys28JMiixtCbxbVo+LugzdkOeRR+7+Ie4PMquLyPoR ekZzXf826dLNfDbtku6kjd1FJonaDlci7g6IbmUWdQ+OLB6xQFKkeJNd83Duk5ugSzlW Fngrf+b5D92LrrtR74uqRuYfRgU4DSfijaSaM= Received: by 10.140.132.8 with SMTP id f8mr2343542rvd.206.1223242018609; Sun, 05 Oct 2008 14:26:58 -0700 (PDT) Received: by 10.140.192.11 with HTTP; Sun, 5 Oct 2008 14:26:58 -0700 (PDT) Message-ID: <6d2ed5bd0810051426w2d30c13agd951d099bfcac5bb@mail.gmail.com> Date: Sun, 5 Oct 2008 16:26:58 -0500 From: "Steev Klimaszewski" <steev@gentoo.org> Sender: steevatgentoo@gmail.com To: gentoo-dev@lists.gentoo.org Subject: [gentoo-dev] "Slacking" arches - which are stable, which aren't? Precedence: bulk List-Post: <mailto:gentoo-dev@lists.gentoo.org> List-Help: <mailto:gentoo-dev+help@lists.gentoo.org> List-Unsubscribe: <mailto:gentoo-dev+unsubscribe@lists.gentoo.org> List-Subscribe: <mailto:gentoo-dev+subscribe@lists.gentoo.org> List-Id: Gentoo Linux mail <gentoo-dev.gentoo.org> X-BeenThere: gentoo-dev@lists.gentoo.org Reply-to: gentoo-dev@lists.gentoo.org MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Content-Disposition: inline X-Google-Sender-Auth: 7f1f4c6b5252c8f2 X-Archives-Salt: 8cbae0c4-2306-45d2-878a-418b5cd26672 X-Archives-Hash: 159c2071cea86b399997723a9d31fcc4 Not wanting to start a huge war about what arches are slacking and which aren't - I asked in -dev on IRC and was told to check out profiles.desc - based on this information, I closed Bug 208917 which was about stablizing dbus-glib-0.74. The bug was opened on 04 Feb 2008, and as of today 05 Oct 2008, the only arches left to stable it are arm, sh, and s390 (and according to profiles.desc, they are all dev profiles) however hoffie said that didn't seem right since he knows things get requested for stable for those arches. So, IS there a definitive list somewhere of what arches are stable, and which aren't, and if so, where can it be found? I have no problem re-opening the bug, but as I stated in -dev, its been almost 8 months since the last *activity* on the bug, and I doubt that they are going to be stabling it any time soon. Thoughts? Helps?