From mboxrd@z Thu Jan  1 00:00:00 1970
Received: from pigeon.gentoo.org ([69.77.167.62] helo=lists.gentoo.org)
	by finch.gentoo.org with esmtp (Exim 4.60)
	(envelope-from <gentoo-dev+bounces-33024-garchives=archives.gentoo.org@lists.gentoo.org>)
	id 1Kmb81-0002Ip-Br
	for garchives@archives.gentoo.org; Sun, 05 Oct 2008 21:27:01 +0000
Received: from pigeon.gentoo.org (localhost [127.0.0.1])
	by pigeon.gentoo.org (Postfix) with SMTP id 0906EE0300;
	Sun,  5 Oct 2008 21:27:00 +0000 (UTC)
Received: from rv-out-0708.google.com (rv-out-0708.google.com [209.85.198.249])
	by pigeon.gentoo.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id C4879E0300
	for <gentoo-dev@lists.gentoo.org>; Sun,  5 Oct 2008 21:26:59 +0000 (UTC)
Received: by rv-out-0708.google.com with SMTP id b17so2370721rvf.46
        for <gentoo-dev@lists.gentoo.org>; Sun, 05 Oct 2008 14:26:58 -0700 (PDT)
DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed;
        d=gmail.com; s=gamma;
        h=domainkey-signature:received:received:message-id:date:from:sender
         :to:subject:mime-version:content-type:content-transfer-encoding
         :content-disposition:x-google-sender-auth;
        bh=NjI7FmTJmHoCwOcM+eFCYV1/IQGt9jI60K019xti5YQ=;
        b=QOGi0XE+VwimlkYnqScwrh3Cov9fRgph5zXuq2yWcFIFdHhZvRCzOYVfrEk7qZudrl
         n7USXGR0Zm0VwtgI/0Bm5qgFV1epkAd8IOl+pmrN9u6018tegXGmm4YqbeOjENyMYA1V
         2UUL3EKSAwkc/8CqlzzbGo/5DMO2/4/ekxKUw=
DomainKey-Signature: a=rsa-sha1; c=nofws;
        d=gmail.com; s=gamma;
        h=message-id:date:from:sender:to:subject:mime-version:content-type
         :content-transfer-encoding:content-disposition:x-google-sender-auth;
        b=NXDppl2LETVBBtjAdqGnnEQjys28JMiixtCbxbVo+LugzdkOeRR+7+Ie4PMquLyPoR
         ekZzXf826dLNfDbtku6kjd1FJonaDlci7g6IbmUWdQ+OLB6xQFKkeJNd83Duk5ugSzlW
         Fngrf+b5D92LrrtR74uqRuYfRgU4DSfijaSaM=
Received: by 10.140.132.8 with SMTP id f8mr2343542rvd.206.1223242018609;
        Sun, 05 Oct 2008 14:26:58 -0700 (PDT)
Received: by 10.140.192.11 with HTTP; Sun, 5 Oct 2008 14:26:58 -0700 (PDT)
Message-ID: <6d2ed5bd0810051426w2d30c13agd951d099bfcac5bb@mail.gmail.com>
Date: Sun, 5 Oct 2008 16:26:58 -0500
From: "Steev Klimaszewski" <steev@gentoo.org>
Sender: steevatgentoo@gmail.com
To: gentoo-dev@lists.gentoo.org
Subject: [gentoo-dev] "Slacking" arches - which are stable, which aren't?
Precedence: bulk
List-Post: <mailto:gentoo-dev@lists.gentoo.org>
List-Help: <mailto:gentoo-dev+help@lists.gentoo.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <mailto:gentoo-dev+unsubscribe@lists.gentoo.org>
List-Subscribe: <mailto:gentoo-dev+subscribe@lists.gentoo.org>
List-Id: Gentoo Linux mail <gentoo-dev.gentoo.org>
X-BeenThere: gentoo-dev@lists.gentoo.org
Reply-to: gentoo-dev@lists.gentoo.org
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
Content-Disposition: inline
X-Google-Sender-Auth: 7f1f4c6b5252c8f2
X-Archives-Salt: 8cbae0c4-2306-45d2-878a-418b5cd26672
X-Archives-Hash: 159c2071cea86b399997723a9d31fcc4

Not wanting to start a huge war about what arches are slacking and
which aren't - I asked in -dev on IRC and was told to check out
profiles.desc - based on this information, I closed Bug 208917 which
was about stablizing dbus-glib-0.74.  The bug was opened on 04 Feb
2008, and as of today 05 Oct 2008, the only arches left to stable it
are arm, sh, and s390 (and according to profiles.desc, they are all
dev profiles) however hoffie said that didn't seem right since he
knows things get requested for stable for those arches.

So, IS there a definitive list somewhere of what arches are stable,
and which aren't, and if so, where can it be found?  I have no problem
re-opening the bug, but as I stated in -dev, its been almost 8 months
since the last *activity* on the bug, and I doubt that they are going
to be stabling it any time soon.

Thoughts? Helps?