From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Received: from pigeon.gentoo.org ([208.92.234.80] helo=lists.gentoo.org) by finch.gentoo.org with esmtp (Exim 4.60) (envelope-from ) id 1M3z0j-0001tj-Im for garchives@archives.gentoo.org; Tue, 12 May 2009 20:55:37 +0000 Received: from pigeon.gentoo.org (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by pigeon.gentoo.org (Postfix) with SMTP id 33A2CE0665; Tue, 12 May 2009 20:55:36 +0000 (UTC) Received: from smtp.gentoo.org (smtp.gentoo.org [140.211.166.183]) by pigeon.gentoo.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 11A0FE0665 for ; Tue, 12 May 2009 20:55:36 +0000 (UTC) Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by smtp.gentoo.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 97AC06575D for ; Tue, 12 May 2009 20:55:35 +0000 (UTC) X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at gentoo.org X-Spam-Score: -5.917 X-Spam-Level: X-Spam-Status: No, score=-5.917 required=5.5 tests=[AWL=0.683, BAYES_00=-2.599, RCVD_IN_DNSWL_MED=-4] Received: from smtp.gentoo.org ([127.0.0.1]) by localhost (smtp.gentoo.org [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id mi0ZoGdarr2H for ; Tue, 12 May 2009 20:55:28 +0000 (UTC) Received: from smtp02.jazztel.es (smtp02.jazztel.es [62.14.3.171]) (using TLSv1 with cipher DHE-RSA-AES256-SHA (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by smtp.gentoo.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 1BCBE650F0 for ; Tue, 12 May 2009 20:55:27 +0000 (UTC) Received: from [87.221.121.15] (helo=mail.bitcetera.com) by smtp02.jazztel.es with esmtpa (Exim 4.69) (envelope-from ) id 1M3yzD-0000ih-0P for gentoo-dev@gentoo.org; Tue, 12 May 2009 22:54:03 +0200 Received: from samba.bitcetera.com (samba.bitcetera.com [192.168.118.20]) (using TLSv1 with cipher AES128-SHA (128/128 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by mail.bitcetera.com (Postfix) with ESMTPSA id 66A7B396034 for ; Tue, 12 May 2009 22:55:24 +0200 (CEST) Message-Id: <6EC3E6EE-F8BF-42F4-90F1-DEA00B628D09@delirium.ch> From: Sven Schwyn To: gentoo-dev@lists.gentoo.org Content-Type: text/plain; charset=US-ASCII; format=flowed; delsp=yes Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Precedence: bulk List-Post: List-Help: List-Unsubscribe: List-Subscribe: List-Id: Gentoo Linux mail X-BeenThere: gentoo-dev@lists.gentoo.org Reply-to: gentoo-dev@lists.gentoo.org Mime-Version: 1.0 (Apple Message framework v930.3) Subject: [gentoo-dev] Re: Files owned by multiple slots Date: Tue, 12 May 2009 22:55:23 +0200 X-Mailer: Apple Mail (2.930.3) X-AntiSpam-Checked: Passed : Threshold - 0.0 : SA jazztel.es X-Virus-Checked: Passed : Kaspersky at jazztel.es X-Archives-Salt: ac366f32-e5be-40b5-8adb-a8548ddda843 X-Archives-Hash: a9942e9d57cd62751f244b6e0ca74bb1 Gilles wrote: > so this wrapper could be installed in a separate eselect sort of > package ? How exactly can this be done? If a gem creates five executables, would this mean that this gem comes in six ebuilds? > If those kind of wrappers are generic enough, it could even be a > single > eselect package and gems would enable (symlink to wrapper) > themselves at > postinst. I'm an eselect n00b but this all sound like something an > eselect module could do. The wrappers can't be boiled down to one unified wrapper. Cheers, -sven