From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: from lists.gentoo.org (pigeon.gentoo.org [208.92.234.80]) (using TLSv1.3 with cipher TLS_AES_256_GCM_SHA384 (256/256 bits) key-exchange X25519 server-signature RSA-PSS (2048 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by finch.gentoo.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 7246F158451 for ; Tue, 9 Jan 2024 05:51:13 +0000 (UTC) Received: from pigeon.gentoo.org (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by pigeon.gentoo.org (Postfix) with SMTP id E82FB2BC025; Tue, 9 Jan 2024 05:51:08 +0000 (UTC) Received: from smtp.gentoo.org (mail.gentoo.org [IPv6:2001:470:ea4a:1:5054:ff:fec7:86e4]) (using TLSv1.3 with cipher TLS_AES_256_GCM_SHA384 (256/256 bits) key-exchange X25519 server-signature RSA-PSS (4096 bits) server-digest SHA256) (No client certificate requested) by pigeon.gentoo.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id A10992BC018 for ; Tue, 9 Jan 2024 05:51:08 +0000 (UTC) Message-ID: <6798345aa52d4b4cc2ebae2450bd3226fe9fcb60.camel@gentoo.org> Subject: Re: [gentoo-dev] [RFC] New category: dev-build From: =?UTF-8?Q?Micha=C5=82_G=C3=B3rny?= To: gentoo-dev@lists.gentoo.org Date: Tue, 09 Jan 2024 06:51:03 +0100 In-Reply-To: References: <72604ee6acd03fb54bc6f664ce915ecd5b16566a.camel@gentoo.org> <3d5f53e891c90681bf090bf0d9a3f5630b0a11b2.camel@gentoo.org> <20240107171855.0890e4bb@Akita> Organization: Gentoo Content-Type: multipart/signed; micalg="pgp-sha512"; protocol="application/pgp-signature"; boundary="=-iBGID0RnWxm3A2d3k7lI" User-Agent: Evolution 3.50.3 Precedence: bulk List-Post: List-Help: List-Unsubscribe: List-Subscribe: List-Id: Gentoo Linux mail X-BeenThere: gentoo-dev@lists.gentoo.org Reply-to: gentoo-dev@lists.gentoo.org X-Auto-Response-Suppress: DR, RN, NRN, OOF, AutoReply MIME-Version: 1.0 X-Archives-Salt: d42e9084-9a7c-4b26-b530-eda4827a260c X-Archives-Hash: 4fd8e233f6efd1a63057d4638ee75ed6 --=-iBGID0RnWxm3A2d3k7lI Content-Type: text/plain; charset="UTF-8" Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable On Mon, 2024-01-08 at 17:32 -0600, Gordon Pettey wrote: > There are at least a few generally language-specific build > tools/systems that can, if you're into masochism, be used to build > other languages (Gradle, Maven, etc.), and tools like Ant, which while > primarily used in Java projects is really just a Makefile with > different syntax and core functions in XML. Does making a new category > for explicitly general-purpose tools like Make and friends ambiguate > where the language-specific tools belong? Should other > non-Make-related packages be moved from their current dev-[language] > locations? >=20 > Does dev-util/gyp really belong there, or since it is node-specific, > should there be a dev-js category? >=20 In all of my RFCs, I've tried to keep moving stuff out of dev- /* altogether. In general, I'd leave it to the maintainers to decide where a package fits best. --=20 Best regards, Micha=C5=82 G=C3=B3rny --=-iBGID0RnWxm3A2d3k7lI Content-Type: application/pgp-signature; name="signature.asc" Content-Description: This is a digitally signed message part -----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE----- iQFGBAABCgAwFiEEx2qEUJQJjSjMiybFY5ra4jKeJA4FAmWc3scSHG1nb3JueUBn ZW50b28ub3JnAAoJEGOa2uIyniQOolAH/3aofa8rtOGUbHvHtHAjZ11y+fMseO8n peSDFx2auhL+yKOvjAdgMWKGCf7Y2AXwTfTnHin7TkOiLbNtpRyDoZdNJ6jSuxb1 o4x29owCn3AG3t11dAuTqPsH/jTEihZI2BecRdA+gjUEJThiB6KSbtusuiNPYVOF wjbalGF6+E2tnesXnc3qhM1WWP7BGln8lQdjgCOZdMqq1oKdBZSVGRM74sQNANgO oHsNCvVII66TC2WtOVpI2hXzpTokvPt8WegAg2+zr9Ev5H9bvhpcqvWcitbnB92U LCi++QjP5PeR9aZM3OI5ZoQrrkAhzygPUN9FZ45B+9bzU5l3zNL3Oco= =eG2n -----END PGP SIGNATURE----- --=-iBGID0RnWxm3A2d3k7lI--