From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: from lists.gentoo.org (pigeon.gentoo.org [208.92.234.80]) (using TLSv1.3 with cipher TLS_AES_256_GCM_SHA384 (256/256 bits) key-exchange X25519 server-signature RSA-PSS (2048 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by finch.gentoo.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id AEECC15800A for ; Sun, 23 Jul 2023 09:20:32 +0000 (UTC) Received: from pigeon.gentoo.org (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by pigeon.gentoo.org (Postfix) with SMTP id D4951E041F; Sun, 23 Jul 2023 09:20:28 +0000 (UTC) Received: from smtp.gentoo.org (woodpecker.gentoo.org [140.211.166.183]) (using TLSv1.3 with cipher TLS_AES_256_GCM_SHA384 (256/256 bits) key-exchange X25519 server-signature RSA-PSS (4096 bits) server-digest SHA256) (No client certificate requested) by pigeon.gentoo.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 6725CE038D for ; Sun, 23 Jul 2023 09:20:28 +0000 (UTC) Received: by smtp.gentoo.org (Postfix, from userid 2212) id 281AD340C33; Sun, 23 Jul 2023 09:20:27 +0000 (UTC) Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by smtp.gentoo.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 27650340C24 for ; Sun, 23 Jul 2023 09:20:27 +0000 (UTC) Date: Sun, 23 Jul 2023 09:20:27 +0000 (UTC) From: Andrey Grozin To: gentoo-dev@lists.gentoo.org Subject: [gentoo-dev] are there any lisps in the default/linux/amd64/17.0/musl profile? Message-ID: <67566f1b-4aa9-15e4-4e72-3def6ff26ce6@woodpecker.gentoo.org> Precedence: bulk List-Post: List-Help: List-Unsubscribe: List-Subscribe: List-Id: Gentoo Linux mail X-BeenThere: gentoo-dev@lists.gentoo.org Reply-to: gentoo-dev@lists.gentoo.org X-Auto-Response-Suppress: DR, RN, NRN, OOF, AutoReply MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; format=flowed; charset=US-ASCII X-Archives-Salt: 9a66cb4f-26fe-458e-a19c-af849f2d7dd7 X-Archives-Hash: 1bd98045f9ef75e489c4685f86251b3f Hello *, grozin@bilbo /home/gentoo/sci-mathematics/maxima $ pkgcheck scan gentoo -- updating git cache: commit date: 2023-07-23 sci-mathematics/maxima UnstableOnly: for arches: [ ppc, x86 ], all versions are unstable: [ 5.46.0-r1, 5.47.0 ] PotentialStable: version 5.46.0-r1: slot(0), stabled arch: [ amd64 ], potentials: [ ~ppc, ~x86 ] RequiredUseDefaults: version 5.46.0-r1: profile: 'default/linux/amd64/17.0/musl' (4 total) failed REQUIRED_USE: ( clisp || clozurecl || clozurecl64 || cmucl || ecls || gcl || sbcl ) RequiredUseDefaults: version 5.47.0: profile: 'default/linux/amd64/17.0/musl' (3 total) failed REQUIRED_USE: ( clisp || clozurecl || clozurecl64 || cmucl || ecls || gcl || sbcl ) It seems that there are no lisps in this profile. This may be correct. But where are all lisps masked? I see only grozin@bilbo /home/gentoo/profiles $ find -name package.mask | xargs fgrep lisp ./arch/powerpc/ppc64/package.mask:dev-lisp/sbcl ./arch/powerpc/ppc64/32ul/package.mask:-dev-lisp/sbcl ./arch/powerpc/ppc64/64le/package.mask:-dev-lisp/sbcl ./arch/sparc/64ul/package.mask:dev-lisp/sbcl sbcl is masked on arches to which it is not ported. Fine. But I don't see where lisps are masked specifically for musl. This may be correct. As far as I know, sbcl cannot work on musl systems; don't know about other lisps. If this is so, maxima should also be masked on musl. Andrey