[gentoo-dev] Repoman check before file stable request

[gentoo-dev] Repoman check before file stable request

[Agostino Sarubbo]

[-- Attachment #1: Type: text/plain, Size: 489 bytes --]

Hello folks,

would be great if everyone runs repoman before file the stable request.

In particular, many times, happens that are required other ~arch packages, so 
a small check like this, should be enough:

for i in x86 amd64 hppa $and_other_arches ;do ekeyword $i $ebuild;done
repoman manifest
repoman commit -p -m "foo"

In this manner we will save a lot of time for us. 
Thanks in advance.
-- 
Agostino Sarubbo		ago -at- gentoo.org
Gentoo/AMD64 Arch Security Liaison
GPG: 0x7CD2DC5D

[-- Attachment #2: This is a digitally signed message part. --]
[-- Type: application/pgp-signature, Size: 490 bytes --]

Re: [gentoo-dev] Repoman check before file stable request

[Agostino Sarubbo]

[-- Attachment #1: Type: text/plain, Size: 505 bytes --]

On Monday 11 June 2012 15:42:25 Agostino Sarubbo wrote:
> In this manner we will save a lot of time for us.
> Thanks in advance.
s/we/you

Anyway, from irc, seems is not very 'clear' what I meant.

I suggested to run repoman to see if are required more packages instead of 
what you think is necessary; then, you are able to include the other packages 
in your stablereq, or open a new bug and make as a block.

-- 
Agostino Sarubbo		ago -at- gentoo.org
Gentoo/AMD64 Arch Security Liaison
GPG: 0x7CD2DC5D

[-- Attachment #2: This is a digitally signed message part. --]
[-- Type: application/pgp-signature, Size: 490 bytes --]

Re: [gentoo-dev] Repoman check before file stable request

[Jeroen Roovers]

On Mon, 11 Jun 2012 15:42:25 +0200
Agostino Sarubbo <ago@gentoo.org> wrote:

> would be great if everyone runs repoman before file the stable
> request.

Generally, yes.

> In particular, many times, happens that are required other ~arch
> packages, so a small check like this, should be enough:
> 
> for i in x86 amd64 hppa $and_other_arches ;do ekeyword $i $ebuild;done

ekeyword $(ARCHES) ${EBUILD}

Saves time.

> repoman manifest
> repoman commit -p -m "foo"

Why would you commit the changes when you only intended to check
deps before filing a stabilisation request?


     jer

Re: [gentoo-dev] Repoman check before file stable request

[Jeroen Roovers]

On Wed, 13 Jun 2012 18:58:40 +0200
Jeroen Roovers <jer@gentoo.org> wrote:

> > for i in x86 amd64 hppa $and_other_arches ;do ekeyword $i
> > $ebuild;done
> 
> ekeyword $(ARCHES) ${EBUILD}

Or even go wild and do
   ekeyword all ${EBUILD}

I don't know how well that magically works (as expected) in different
scenarios (more than one SLOTs, no stable in the same SLOT and so on).


     jer

Re: [gentoo-dev] Repoman check before file stable request

[Agostino Sarubbo]

[-- Attachment #1: Type: text/plain, Size: 594 bytes --]

On Wednesday 13 June 2012 18:58:40 Jeroen Roovers wrote:
> ekeyword $(ARCHES) ${EBUILD}
> 
> Saves time.

Yep, good example.


> > repoman manifest
> > repoman commit -p -m "foo"
> 
> Why would you commit the changes when you only intended to check
> deps before filing a stabilisation request?

-p will not commit anything. You can see only what happens if you go ahead 
without -p. 

Anyway, the idea is: check the other(s) ~arch depend(s) before file stable 
request in any method that you prefer.
-- 
Agostino Sarubbo		ago -at- gentoo.org
Gentoo/AMD64 Arch Security Liaison
GPG: 0x7CD2DC5D

[-- Attachment #2: This is a digitally signed message part. --]
[-- Type: application/pgp-signature, Size: 490 bytes --]