From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: (qmail 2702 invoked from network); 18 May 2004 19:55:55 +0000 Received: from smtp.gentoo.org (156.56.111.197) by parrot.ussg.indiana.edu with SMTP; 18 May 2004 19:55:55 +0000 Received: from parrot.ussg.indiana.edu ([156.56.111.196] helo=parrot.gentoo.org) by smtp.gentoo.org with esmtp (Exim 4.34) id 1BQAhr-000605-6l for arch-gentoo-dev@lists.gentoo.org; Tue, 18 May 2004 19:56:55 +0000 Received: (qmail 15846 invoked by uid 89); 18 May 2004 19:55:52 +0000 Mailing-List: contact gentoo-dev-help@gentoo.org; run by ezmlm Precedence: bulk List-Post: List-Help: List-Unsubscribe: List-Subscribe: List-Id: Gentoo Linux mail X-BeenThere: gentoo-dev@gentoo.org Received: (qmail 17349 invoked from network); 18 May 2004 19:55:52 +0000 Message-ID: <64171.68.127.11.242.1084910216.squirrel@webmail.churchillrandoms.co.uk> In-Reply-To: References: Date: Tue, 18 May 2004 20:56:56 +0100 (BST) From: "Stefan Jones" To: "Ajai Khattri" Cc: gentoo-dev@lists.gentoo.org User-Agent: SquirrelMail/1.4.2 MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain;charset=iso-8859-1 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 8bit X-Priority: 3 Importance: Normal X-Scanned-By: AMaViS-ng at churchillrandoms.co.uk Subject: Re: [gentoo-dev] libc.so.6 error X-Archives-Salt: 573d9389-a989-4884-8d93-fa7e24beadbe X-Archives-Hash: 3bb09c04fd3034b4c6d7d68254035dea Known problem, it is fixed in the unstable glibc versions. There is probably a bug open about it. I think it happened because libc.so is a shared executable which does not rely on libc and the lists got mucked up. Stefan Ajai Khattri said: > > Can anyone explain this? > > # /lib/libc.so.6 > Inconsistency detected by ld.so: rtld.c: 1252: dl_main: Assertion > `_rtld_local._dl_rtld_map.l_prev->l_next == > _rtld_local._dl_rtld_map.l_next' failed! > > I am using 2.6.5-gentoo-r1 kernel and libc was compiled with nptl enabled. > > -- > Aj. > Sys. Admin / Developer > > -- > gentoo-dev@gentoo.org mailing list > -- gentoo-dev@gentoo.org mailing list