From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: from lists.gentoo.org (pigeon.gentoo.org [208.92.234.80]) by finch.gentoo.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id D2A57138AC3 for ; Sun, 17 Feb 2013 21:30:29 +0000 (UTC) Received: from pigeon.gentoo.org (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by pigeon.gentoo.org (Postfix) with SMTP id 3438E21C00A; Sun, 17 Feb 2013 21:30:26 +0000 (UTC) Received: from smtp.gentoo.org (smtp.gentoo.org [140.211.166.183]) (using TLSv1 with cipher AECDH-AES256-SHA (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by pigeon.gentoo.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 4AC7FE027D for ; Sun, 17 Feb 2013 21:30:25 +0000 (UTC) Received: from devil (localhost [127.0.0.1]) (using TLSv1 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES256-SHA (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) (Authenticated sender: ago) by smtp.gentoo.org (Postfix) with ESMTPSA id 2BF9933DB7B for ; Sun, 17 Feb 2013 21:30:24 +0000 (UTC) From: Agostino Sarubbo To: gentoo-dev@lists.gentoo.org Subject: Re: [gentoo-dev] The status of the 'minor' arches in gentoo Date: Sun, 17 Feb 2013 22:30:15 +0100 Message-ID: <6375410.5RpIsDot9R@devil> User-Agent: KMail/4.9.5 (Linux/3.2.35-gentoo; KDE/4.9.5; i686; ; ) In-Reply-To: References: <2415518.JM1V4B20yx@devil> <1876970.ovCtsDMXQe@devil> Precedence: bulk List-Post: List-Help: List-Unsubscribe: List-Subscribe: List-Id: Gentoo Linux mail X-BeenThere: gentoo-dev@lists.gentoo.org Reply-to: gentoo-dev@lists.gentoo.org MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7Bit Content-Type: text/plain; charset="utf-8" X-Archives-Salt: 78afebad-a696-401c-8534-af67fac6b04a X-Archives-Hash: 046c8e322c4b0e35ff56291e8841ed23 On Sunday 17 February 2013 13:14:28 Alec Warner wrote: > It is not > clear to me why you would email the -dev list about these arches, > vapier is pretty responsive over email and irc. I don't guess is a good idea have a private conversation and then drop an arch... -- Agostino Sarubbo / ago -at- gentoo.org Gentoo Linux Developer