From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: (qmail 1693 invoked by uid 1002); 20 Oct 2003 09:01:57 -0000 Mailing-List: contact gentoo-dev-help@gentoo.org; run by ezmlm Precedence: bulk List-Post: List-Help: List-Unsubscribe: List-Subscribe: List-Id: Gentoo Linux mail X-BeenThere: gentoo-dev@gentoo.org Received: (qmail 8435 invoked from network); 20 Oct 2003 09:01:57 -0000 Message-ID: <61789.194.154.142.99.1066640516.squirrel@www.fusemail.com> In-Reply-To: References: Date: Mon, 20 Oct 2003 04:01:56 -0500 (CDT) From: "Svyatogor" To: gentoo-dev@gentoo.org Reply-To: svyatogor@gentoo.org User-Agent: SquirrelMail/1.4.0 MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain;charset=iso-8859-1 X-Priority: 3 Importance: Normal Subject: Re: [gentoo-dev] i18n herd X-Archives-Salt: 08169a99-3fa2-46e8-bca4-73249ce72520 X-Archives-Hash: 062c0d7579ea30d5d242e9af77d65551 > -----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE----- > Hash: SHA1 > Now, those packages are currently herdless because i'm not sure what > strategy should be taken when assigning them to herds. > There are two options regarding that: > > a) Creating a general i18n herd for all i18n-related packages (the cjk > herd could probably be merged into that). > b) Creating specialized herds for each region/language group - ie. > middle-east, cjk, anything else? I would deffinetly vote for the second option. -- gentoo-dev@gentoo.org mailing list