From: Jakub Moc <jakub@gentoo.org>
To: Chris Gianelloni <gentoo-dev@lists.gentoo.org>
Subject: Re[2]: [gentoo-dev] ROX: maintainer-wanted and apps out of date
Date: Mon, 12 Sep 2005 16:26:37 +0200 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <613013693.20050912162637@gentoo.org> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <1126533798.455.23.camel@cgianelloni.nuvox.net>
[-- Attachment #1: Type: text/plain, Size: 923 bytes --]
12.9.2005, 16:03:17, Chris Gianelloni wrote:
> Many users seem to think that a WONTFIX is non-negotiable. I tend to agree
> with them, for the most part. Rather than WONTFIX them, simply tell them that
> they won't be included as-is. WONTFIX gives the user the impression that we
> are not interested in their work or the package, when this is not the case.
http://dev.gentoo.org/~ciaranm/docs/mw-faq/wontfix.txt
Telling them that the ebuild "won't be included as-is" pretty much equals
WONTFIX, except for the major disadvantage that is can't be tracked via
Bugzilla at all... not so much fun really, considering there are over 600 new
ebuild bugs there.
--
Best regards,
Jakub Moc
mailto:jakub@gentoo.org
GPG signature: http://pgp.mit.edu:11371/pks/lookup?op=get&search=0xCEBA3D9E
Primary key fingerprint: D2D7 933C 9BA1 C95B 2C95 B30F 8717 D5FD CEBA 3D9E
... still no signature ;)
[-- Attachment #2: Type: application/pgp-signature, Size: 183 bytes --]
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2005-09-12 14:29 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 30+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2005-09-11 13:58 [gentoo-dev] ROX: maintainer-wanted and apps out of date Peter Hyman
2005-09-11 15:50 ` Maurice van der Pot
2005-09-11 16:42 ` Peter Hyman
2005-09-11 19:24 ` Maurice van der Pot
2005-09-11 21:02 ` Alin Nastac
2005-09-12 0:10 ` Aron Griffis
2005-09-12 7:04 ` Alin Nastac
2005-09-12 0:14 ` Peter Hyman
2005-09-12 0:25 ` Ciaran McCreesh
2005-09-12 0:38 ` Alec Warner
2005-09-12 11:55 ` Carsten Lohrke
2005-09-12 14:03 ` Chris Gianelloni
2005-09-12 14:26 ` Jakub Moc [this message]
2005-09-12 14:28 ` Maurice van der Pot
2005-09-12 15:41 ` Peter Hyman
2005-09-12 16:12 ` Martin Schlemmer
2005-09-12 17:00 ` Peter Hyman
2005-09-12 17:12 ` Jan Kundrát
2005-09-12 17:25 ` Stephen P. Becker
2005-09-12 17:51 ` Chris Gianelloni
2005-09-12 17:03 ` Ciaran McCreesh
2005-09-12 17:32 ` Carsten Lohrke
2005-09-12 17:40 ` Ciaran McCreesh
2005-09-12 17:56 ` Re[2]: " Jakub Moc
2005-09-12 18:53 ` Carsten Lohrke
2005-09-12 19:21 ` Ciaran McCreesh
2005-09-13 0:20 ` Nathan L. Adams
2005-09-12 19:26 ` [gentoo-dev] " Dan Meltzer
2005-09-12 0:27 ` [gentoo-dev] " Stephen P. Becker
2005-09-12 0:36 ` Peter Hyman
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=613013693.20050912162637@gentoo.org \
--to=jakub@gentoo.org \
--cc=gentoo-dev@lists.gentoo.org \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox