[gentoo-dev] [PATCH v2] ruby-ng.eclass: Include (-) in RUBY_TARGETS USE-dependencies

[gentoo-dev] [PATCH v2] ruby-ng.eclass: Include (-) in RUBY_TARGETS USE-dependencies

[Michał Górny]

Using 2-style USE dependencies on packages not having the flag
in question is forbidden by PMS.

Signed-off-by: Michał Górny <mgorny@gentoo.org>
---
 eclass/ruby-ng.eclass | 6 +++---
 1 file changed, 3 insertions(+), 3 deletions(-)

diff --git a/eclass/ruby-ng.eclass b/eclass/ruby-ng.eclass
index db701d81f4fc..85f464d9f30d 100644
--- a/eclass/ruby-ng.eclass
+++ b/eclass/ruby-ng.eclass
@@ -137,7 +137,7 @@ ruby_samelib() {
 	local res=
 	for _ruby_implementation in $(_ruby_get_all_impls); do
 		has -${_ruby_implementation} $@ || \
-			res="${res}ruby_targets_${_ruby_implementation}?,"
+			res="${res}ruby_targets_${_ruby_implementation}(-)?,"
 	done
 
 	echo "[${res%,}]"
@@ -151,9 +151,9 @@ _ruby_atoms_samelib_generic() {
 			"||" | "(" | ")" | *"?")
 				echo "${token}" ;;
 			*])
-				echo "${token%[*}[RUBYTARGET,${token/*[}" ;;
+				echo "${token%[*}[RUBYTARGET(-),${token/*[}" ;;
 			*)
-				echo "${token}[RUBYTARGET]" ;;
+				echo "${token}[RUBYTARGET(-)]" ;;
 		esac
 	done
 	echo ")"
-- 
2.24.1

Re: [gentoo-dev] [PATCH v2] ruby-ng.eclass: Include (-) in RUBY_TARGETS USE-dependencies

[Ulrich Mueller]

[-- Attachment #1: Type: text/plain, Size: 527 bytes --]

>>>>> On Thu, 02 Jan 2020, Michał Górny wrote:

> --- a/eclass/ruby-ng.eclass
> +++ b/eclass/ruby-ng.eclass
> @@ -137,7 +137,7 @@ ruby_samelib() {
>  	local res=
>  	for _ruby_implementation in $(_ruby_get_all_impls); do
>  		has -${_ruby_implementation} $@ || \
> -			res="${res}ruby_targets_${_ruby_implementation}?,"
> +			res="${res}ruby_targets_${_ruby_implementation}(-)?,"
>  	done
>  
>  	echo "[${res%,}]"

Hadn't we established that ruby_samelib() is dead code, no longer used
since 2010?

Ulrich

[-- Attachment #2: signature.asc --]
[-- Type: application/pgp-signature, Size: 487 bytes --]

Re: [gentoo-dev] [PATCH v2] ruby-ng.eclass: Include (-) in RUBY_TARGETS USE-dependencies

[Michał Górny]

[-- Attachment #1: Type: text/plain, Size: 853 bytes --]

On Thu, 2020-01-02 at 21:15 +0100, Ulrich Mueller wrote:
> > > > > > On Thu, 02 Jan 2020, Michał Górny wrote:
> > --- a/eclass/ruby-ng.eclass
> > +++ b/eclass/ruby-ng.eclass
> > @@ -137,7 +137,7 @@ ruby_samelib() {
> >  	local res=
> >  	for _ruby_implementation in $(_ruby_get_all_impls); do
> >  		has -${_ruby_implementation} $@ || \
> > -			res="${res}ruby_targets_${_ruby_implementation}?,"
> > +			res="${res}ruby_targets_${_ruby_implementation}(-)?,"
> >  	done
> >  
> >  	echo "[${res%,}]"
> 
> Hadn't we established that ruby_samelib() is dead code, no longer used
> since 2010?
> 

You did.  However, it isn't marked as private API and I'm not the eclass
maintainer to take care of removing public API.  I have no clue if Ruby
project doesn't have some secret overlays using it.

-- 
Best regards,
Michał Górny


[-- Attachment #2: This is a digitally signed message part --]
[-- Type: application/pgp-signature, Size: 618 bytes --]

Re: [gentoo-dev] [PATCH v2] ruby-ng.eclass: Include (-) in RUBY_TARGETS USE-dependencies

[Michael 'veremitz' Everitt]

[-- Attachment #1.1: Type: text/plain, Size: 988 bytes --]

On 02/01/20 21:08, Michał Górny wrote:
> On Thu, 2020-01-02 at 21:15 +0100, Ulrich Mueller wrote:
>>>>>>> On Thu, 02 Jan 2020, Michał Górny wrote:
>>> --- a/eclass/ruby-ng.eclass
>>> +++ b/eclass/ruby-ng.eclass
>>> @@ -137,7 +137,7 @@ ruby_samelib() {
>>>  	local res=
>>>  	for _ruby_implementation in $(_ruby_get_all_impls); do
>>>  		has -${_ruby_implementation} $@ || \
>>> -			res="${res}ruby_targets_${_ruby_implementation}?,"
>>> +			res="${res}ruby_targets_${_ruby_implementation}(-)?,"
>>>  	done
>>>  
>>>  	echo "[${res%,}]"
>> Hadn't we established that ruby_samelib() is dead code, no longer used
>> since 2010?
>>
> You did.  However, it isn't marked as private API and I'm not the eclass
> maintainer to take care of removing public API.  I have no clue if Ruby
> project doesn't have some secret overlays using it.
>
<sarcasm> You can't use QA super-powerz ?! BDFL + sub-BDFL ?! </sarcasm>*

* Thought the tags probably worth making explicit


[-- Attachment #2: OpenPGP digital signature --]
[-- Type: application/pgp-signature, Size: 801 bytes --]

Re: [gentoo-dev] [PATCH v2] ruby-ng.eclass: Include (-) in RUBY_TARGETS USE-dependencies

[David Seifert]

On Thu, 2020-01-02 at 21:54 +0000, Michael 'veremitz' Everitt wrote:
> On 02/01/20 21:08, Michał Górny wrote:
> > On Thu, 2020-01-02 at 21:15 +0100, Ulrich Mueller wrote:
> > > > > > > > On Thu, 02 Jan 2020, Michał Górny wrote:
> > > > --- a/eclass/ruby-ng.eclass
> > > > +++ b/eclass/ruby-ng.eclass
> > > > @@ -137,7 +137,7 @@ ruby_samelib() {
> > > >  	local res=
> > > >  	for _ruby_implementation in $(_ruby_get_all_impls); do
> > > >  		has -${_ruby_implementation} $@ || \
> > > > -			res="${res}ruby_targets_${_ruby_impleme
> > > > ntation}?,"
> > > > +			res="${res}ruby_targets_${_ruby_impleme
> > > > ntation}(-)?,"
> > > >  	done
> > > >  
> > > >  	echo "[${res%,}]"
> > > Hadn't we established that ruby_samelib() is dead code, no longer
> > > used
> > > since 2010?
> > > 
> > You did.  However, it isn't marked as private API and I'm not the
> > eclass
> > maintainer to take care of removing public API.  I have no clue if
> > Ruby
> > project doesn't have some secret overlays using it.
> > 
> <sarcasm> You can't use QA super-powerz ?! BDFL + sub-BDFL ?!
> </sarcasm>*
> 
> * Thought the tags probably worth making explicit
> 

Can you please stop polluting the -dev mailing list with this senseless
chatter?

Re: [gentoo-dev] [PATCH v2] ruby-ng.eclass: Include (-) in RUBY_TARGETS USE-dependencies

[Michael 'veremitz' Everitt]

[-- Attachment #1.1: Type: text/plain, Size: 1509 bytes --]

On 03/01/20 10:36, David Seifert wrote:
> On Thu, 2020-01-02 at 21:54 +0000, Michael 'veremitz' Everitt wrote:
>> On 02/01/20 21:08, Michał Górny wrote:
>>> On Thu, 2020-01-02 at 21:15 +0100, Ulrich Mueller wrote:
>>>>>>>>> On Thu, 02 Jan 2020, Michał Górny wrote:
>>>>> --- a/eclass/ruby-ng.eclass
>>>>> +++ b/eclass/ruby-ng.eclass
>>>>> @@ -137,7 +137,7 @@ ruby_samelib() {
>>>>>  	local res=
>>>>>  	for _ruby_implementation in $(_ruby_get_all_impls); do
>>>>>  		has -${_ruby_implementation} $@ || \
>>>>> -			res="${res}ruby_targets_${_ruby_impleme
>>>>> ntation}?,"
>>>>> +			res="${res}ruby_targets_${_ruby_impleme
>>>>> ntation}(-)?,"
>>>>>  	done
>>>>>  
>>>>>  	echo "[${res%,}]"
>>>> Hadn't we established that ruby_samelib() is dead code, no longer
>>>> used
>>>> since 2010?
>>>>
>>> You did.  However, it isn't marked as private API and I'm not the
>>> eclass
>>> maintainer to take care of removing public API.  I have no clue if
>>> Ruby
>>> project doesn't have some secret overlays using it.
>>>
>> <sarcasm> You can't use QA super-powerz ?! BDFL + sub-BDFL ?!
>> </sarcasm>*
>>
>> * Thought the tags probably worth making explicit
>>
> Can you please stop polluting the -dev mailing list with this senseless
> chatter?
>
>
Perhaps I should remind you that this is a public mailing list (or hasn't
successfully been censored Yet) and not a private communication channel for
developers (see -core for this). But I don't need to tell you this....


[-- Attachment #2: OpenPGP digital signature --]
[-- Type: application/pgp-signature, Size: 801 bytes --]

Re: [gentoo-dev] [PATCH v2] ruby-ng.eclass: Include (-) in RUBY_TARGETS USE-dependencies

[Luca Barbato]

On 03/01/2020 23:34, Michael 'veremitz' Everitt wrote:
> On 03/01/20 10:36, David Seifert wrote:
>> On Thu, 2020-01-02 at 21:54 +0000, Michael 'veremitz' Everitt wrote:
>>> On 02/01/20 21:08, Michał Górny wrote:
>>>> On Thu, 2020-01-02 at 21:15 +0100, Ulrich Mueller wrote:
>>>>>>>>>> On Thu, 02 Jan 2020, Michał Górny wrote:
>>>>>> --- a/eclass/ruby-ng.eclass
>>>>>> +++ b/eclass/ruby-ng.eclass
>>>>>> @@ -137,7 +137,7 @@ ruby_samelib() {
>>>>>>   	local res=
>>>>>>   	for _ruby_implementation in $(_ruby_get_all_impls); do
>>>>>>   		has -${_ruby_implementation} $@ || \
>>>>>> -			res="${res}ruby_targets_${_ruby_impleme
>>>>>> ntation}?,"
>>>>>> +			res="${res}ruby_targets_${_ruby_impleme
>>>>>> ntation}(-)?,"
>>>>>>   	done
>>>>>>   
>>>>>>   	echo "[${res%,}]"
>>>>> Hadn't we established that ruby_samelib() is dead code, no longer
>>>>> used
>>>>> since 2010?
>>>>>
>>>> You did.  However, it isn't marked as private API and I'm not the
>>>> eclass
>>>> maintainer to take care of removing public API.  I have no clue if
>>>> Ruby
>>>> project doesn't have some secret overlays using it.
>>>>
>>> <sarcasm> You can't use QA super-powerz ?! BDFL + sub-BDFL ?!
>>> </sarcasm>*
>>>
>>> * Thought the tags probably worth making explicit
>>>
>> Can you please stop polluting the -dev mailing list with this senseless
>> chatter?
>>
>>
> Perhaps I should remind you that this is a public mailing list (or hasn't
> successfully been censored Yet) and not a private communication channel for
> developers (see -core for this). But I don't need to tell you this....
> 

Hi, at least a person is displeased with your attempt at humor, could 
you please stop doing this? It does not add anything to the conversation 
and it is unpleasant.

lu

PS: This counts as friendly warning.

Re: [gentoo-dev] [PATCH v2] ruby-ng.eclass: Include (-) in RUBY_TARGETS USE-dependencies

[James Le Cuirot]

[-- Attachment #1: Type: text/plain, Size: 2032 bytes --]

On Fri, 3 Jan 2020 22:34:19 +0000
Michael 'veremitz' Everitt <gentoo@veremit.xyz> wrote:

> On 03/01/20 10:36, David Seifert wrote:
> > On Thu, 2020-01-02 at 21:54 +0000, Michael 'veremitz' Everitt wrote:  
> >> On 02/01/20 21:08, Michał Górny wrote:  
> >>> On Thu, 2020-01-02 at 21:15 +0100, Ulrich Mueller wrote:  
> >>>>>>>>> On Thu, 02 Jan 2020, Michał Górny wrote:  
> >>>>> --- a/eclass/ruby-ng.eclass
> >>>>> +++ b/eclass/ruby-ng.eclass
> >>>>> @@ -137,7 +137,7 @@ ruby_samelib() {
> >>>>>  	local res=
> >>>>>  	for _ruby_implementation in $(_ruby_get_all_impls); do
> >>>>>  		has -${_ruby_implementation} $@ || \
> >>>>> -			res="${res}ruby_targets_${_ruby_impleme
> >>>>> ntation}?,"
> >>>>> +			res="${res}ruby_targets_${_ruby_impleme
> >>>>> ntation}(-)?,"
> >>>>>  	done
> >>>>>  
> >>>>>  	echo "[${res%,}]"  
> >>>> Hadn't we established that ruby_samelib() is dead code, no longer
> >>>> used
> >>>> since 2010?
> >>>>  
> >>> You did.  However, it isn't marked as private API and I'm not the
> >>> eclass
> >>> maintainer to take care of removing public API.  I have no clue if
> >>> Ruby
> >>> project doesn't have some secret overlays using it.
> >>>  
> >> <sarcasm> You can't use QA super-powerz ?! BDFL + sub-BDFL ?!
> >> </sarcasm>*
> >>
> >> * Thought the tags probably worth making explicit
> >>  
> > Can you please stop polluting the -dev mailing list with this senseless
> > chatter?
> >
> >  
> Perhaps I should remind you that this is a public mailing list (or hasn't
> successfully been censored Yet) and not a private communication channel for
> developers (see -core for this). But I don't need to tell you this....

This may be a public list and I don't always expect threads to stay
precisely on-topic but the posts should still have some value. This was
just frivolous. You won't know this but I have defended your presence
on this list multiple times in the past. Please respect that.

-- 
James Le Cuirot (chewi)
Gentoo Linux Developer

[-- Attachment #2: OpenPGP digital signature --]
[-- Type: application/pgp-signature, Size: 833 bytes --]

Re: [gentoo-dev] [PATCH v2] ruby-ng.eclass: Include (-) in RUBY_TARGETS USE-dependencies

[Hans de Graaff]

[-- Attachment #1: Type: text/plain, Size: 226 bytes --]

On Thu, 2020-01-02 at 16:57 +0100, Michał Górny wrote:
> Using 2-style USE dependencies on packages not having the flag
> in question is forbidden by PMS.

Looks good to me, thanks for proposing a fix for this.

Hans

[-- Attachment #2: This is a digitally signed message part --]
[-- Type: application/pgp-signature, Size: 488 bytes --]

Re: [gentoo-dev] [PATCH v2] ruby-ng.eclass: Include (-) in RUBY_TARGETS USE-dependencies

[Hans de Graaff]

[-- Attachment #1: Type: text/plain, Size: 612 bytes --]

On Thu, 2020-01-02 at 22:08 +0100, Michał Górny wrote:
> On Thu, 2020-01-02 at 21:15 +0100, Ulrich Mueller wrote:
> 
> > Hadn't we established that ruby_samelib() is dead code, no longer
> > used
> > since 2010?
> > 
> 
> You did.  However, it isn't marked as private API and I'm not the
> eclass
> maintainer to take care of removing public API.  I have no clue if
> Ruby
> project doesn't have some secret overlays using it.

I'm not aware of any usage, but I also was not aware that this is no
longer used. I'll make a note to check this out and propose a
deprecation/removal plan.

Hans

[-- Attachment #2: This is a digitally signed message part --]
[-- Type: application/pgp-signature, Size: 488 bytes --]