Re: [gentoo-dev] April Council meeting summary

[galevsky@gmail.com]

Very good job.

2007/4/13, Mike Frysinger <vapier@gentoo.org>:
> here is a summary of this month's meeting.  people seem to think that the CoC
> is set in stone now when in reality it is not ... feel free to hilite
> anything you feel wasnt addressed in the previous discussion or anything new
> you've thought of (i went through the previous threads and tried to distill
> out things that were missed, but i cant catch it all).
>
> CoC:
>         - amne has been doing a good job putting the group together
>         - ask proctors to address these two issues for next meeting:
>                 - add a "mission" statement
>                 - fix wording to have a positive spin
> sync Social Contract with Gentoo Foundation (external entities):
>         - trustees will review the statement to clarify things and then
>           we'll look again at syncing
> documentation for mail servers:
>         - they are supposed to be finished in terms of content
>         - wolf will look at getting them actually committed
> PMS:
>         - current status looks good in getting issues resolved
>         - should be up and running on Gentoo infra by next meeting
>         - let the devs sort out the todo as the current work flow seems
>           to be getting things done finally
> splitting gentoo-dev mailing lists:
>         - no real favorable backing for this
>         - people dont like -dev because of the crap, splitting the lists
>           will just move the crap else where, not really solving anything
>         - let proctors do their thing and if need be, review this again
> limiting of council powers:
>         - doesnt seem to be real backing for this from dev community or
>           the council itself
>         - if a majority of developers are truly upset/disturbed by a
>           council decision, it should show easily
>         - if you dont like a council member, dont vote for them next time
> moving gentoo-core to public archives:
>         - many people dislike this moving forward
>         - use -dev over -core for most things
>         - not going to happen at this time
>         - look into getting a dev-only archive finally
> surveys:
>         - robbat2 will look at getting user/dev surveys in place after the
>           release of 2007.0
>         - probably try and take fresh surveys after each bi-annual release
>           from now on to see if we're meeting many of users' desires
> new metastructure proposal:
>         - doesnt seem to address any of the problems it proposes to
>         - a large majority of developers and users prefer the single tree
>           development style that Gentoo has versus many smaller trees
>
> full log at the normal place:
> http://www.gentoo.org/proj/en/council/meeting-logs/20070412.txt
> -mike
>
>
-- 
gentoo-dev@gentoo.org mailing list