From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: from lists.gentoo.org (pigeon.gentoo.org [208.92.234.80]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES256-GCM-SHA384 (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by finch.gentoo.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 42F68139694 for ; Tue, 25 Jul 2017 12:27:03 +0000 (UTC) Received: from pigeon.gentoo.org (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by pigeon.gentoo.org (Postfix) with SMTP id A5027E0BC7; Tue, 25 Jul 2017 12:26:56 +0000 (UTC) Received: from smtp.gentoo.org (dev.gentoo.org [IPv6:2001:470:ea4a:1:5054:ff:fec7:86e4]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES128-GCM-SHA256 (128/128 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by pigeon.gentoo.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 5911FE084F for ; Tue, 25 Jul 2017 12:26:56 +0000 (UTC) Received: from [10.1.1.204] (vpn1.metro-data.com [65.213.236.242]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES128-GCM-SHA256 (128/128 bits)) (No client certificate requested) (Authenticated sender: mjo) by smtp.gentoo.org (Postfix) with ESMTPSA id 1B81634174E for ; Tue, 25 Jul 2017 12:26:55 +0000 (UTC) Subject: Re: [gentoo-dev] [RFC pre-GLEP] Gentoo Git Workflow To: gentoo-dev@lists.gentoo.org References: <1500969906.1206.1.camel@gentoo.org> <0A428688-D128-4767-A9E5-E0F2D3004B18@gentoo.org> From: Michael Orlitzky Message-ID: <5a155985-1ce4-9872-0259-b67520d9a867@gentoo.org> Date: Tue, 25 Jul 2017 08:26:45 -0400 User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (X11; Linux x86_64; rv:52.0) Gecko/20100101 Thunderbird/52.2.0 Precedence: bulk List-Post: List-Help: List-Unsubscribe: List-Subscribe: List-Id: Gentoo Linux mail X-BeenThere: gentoo-dev@lists.gentoo.org Reply-to: gentoo-dev@lists.gentoo.org MIME-Version: 1.0 In-Reply-To: <0A428688-D128-4767-A9E5-E0F2D3004B18@gentoo.org> Content-Type: text/plain; charset=utf-8 Content-Language: en-GB Content-Transfer-Encoding: 8bit X-Archives-Salt: ef5cc10d-172d-48be-aa00-e7f9310f6a89 X-Archives-Hash: 3219fc167d6dc543c6124a6b90a86901 On 07/25/2017 07:52 AM, Michał Górny wrote: > > I have no clue what you mean. I'm just saying that if you push 10 > changes in 10 commits, you don't have to go straight to -r10 in a > single push. > Exactly. Do that instead of hoping that no one checks out your intermediate commits. There's no limit to the number of revisions we can have, and trying to keep track of when it's safe to push in your head is asking for trouble.