From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: (qmail 2456 invoked by uid 1002); 4 Oct 2003 04:13:19 -0000 Mailing-List: contact gentoo-dev-help@gentoo.org; run by ezmlm Precedence: bulk List-Post: List-Help: List-Unsubscribe: List-Subscribe: List-Id: Gentoo Linux mail X-BeenThere: gentoo-dev@gentoo.org Received: (qmail 27056 invoked from network); 4 Oct 2003 04:13:19 -0000 Mime-Version: 1.0 (Apple Message framework v606) In-Reply-To: <1065233286.17858.7.camel@sfa234225.richmond.edu> References: <3F7D4315.1020900@gentoo.org> <200310031034.39985.iggy@gentoo.org> <1065233286.17858.7.camel@sfa234225.richmond.edu> Content-Type: text/plain; charset=US-ASCII; format=flowed Message-Id: <5CB4A224-F620-11D7-B976-000A95795F3E@stellar.eclipse.co.uk> Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit From: Stroller Date: Sat, 4 Oct 2003 05:08:08 +0100 To: gentoo-dev@gentoo.org X-Mailer: Apple Mail (2.606) Subject: Re: [gentoo-dev] Speaking of new kernels being added to the tree X-Archives-Salt: 8265c8e6-79c3-4c66-8214-aa1098ea4cbe X-Archives-Hash: 9983a0c8700eb958f2bfea556e21eaa1 On 4 Oct 2003, at 3:08 am, Donnie Berkholz wrote: >> Could someone please clarify what I'm failing to understand..? >> Are wolk-, redhat-, secure-, mm- & ck-sources not distributed as >> complete tarballs..? > > In many cases, it's a vanilla kernel and a prepackaged patchset. Right. So those should (theoretically) require zero maintenance from Gentoo -devs, then..? Apart from an eBuild wrapper. Stroller. -- gentoo-dev@gentoo.org mailing list