From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: from lists.gentoo.org (pigeon.gentoo.org [208.92.234.80]) (using TLSv1.3 with cipher TLS_AES_256_GCM_SHA384 (256/256 bits) key-exchange X25519 server-signature RSA-PSS (2048 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by finch.gentoo.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 3265815806E for ; Sun, 14 May 2023 15:22:09 +0000 (UTC) Received: from pigeon.gentoo.org (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by pigeon.gentoo.org (Postfix) with SMTP id 448B0E0898; Sun, 14 May 2023 15:22:05 +0000 (UTC) Received: from smtp.gentoo.org (dev.gentoo.org [IPv6:2001:470:ea4a:1:5054:ff:fec7:86e4]) (using TLSv1.3 with cipher TLS_AES_256_GCM_SHA384 (256/256 bits) key-exchange X25519 server-signature RSA-PSS (4096 bits) server-digest SHA256) (No client certificate requested) by pigeon.gentoo.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 01800E0894 for ; Sun, 14 May 2023 15:22:04 +0000 (UTC) From: Andreas Sturmlechner To: gentoo-dev@lists.gentoo.org Subject: Re: [gentoo-dev] USE-flag gnome-keyring isn't accurate anymore Date: Sun, 14 May 2023 17:21:48 +0200 Message-ID: <5949454.lOV4Wx5bFT@tuxbrain> In-Reply-To: References: <20211223223500.522a6b3c@ventiloplattform.tastytea.de> <697445AF-7843-4C60-9B82-CFC371DBC11C@gentoo.org> Precedence: bulk List-Post: List-Help: List-Unsubscribe: List-Subscribe: List-Id: Gentoo Linux mail X-BeenThere: gentoo-dev@lists.gentoo.org Reply-to: gentoo-dev@lists.gentoo.org X-Auto-Response-Suppress: DR, RN, NRN, OOF, AutoReply MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: multipart/signed; boundary="nextPart4845040.31r3eYUQgx"; micalg="pgp-sha512"; protocol="application/pgp-signature" X-Archives-Salt: dfa4e9b1-2e20-41ae-bb7a-8045d33bb5b2 X-Archives-Hash: 91b2658a5361b01ae8d19b2d5fc15d0b --nextPart4845040.31r3eYUQgx Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable Content-Type: text/plain; charset="UTF-8"; protected-headers="v1" From: Andreas Sturmlechner To: gentoo-dev@lists.gentoo.org Date: Sun, 14 May 2023 17:21:48 +0200 Message-ID: <5949454.lOV4Wx5bFT@tuxbrain> MIME-Version: 1.0 On Sonntag, 26. Dezember 2021 11:10:45 CEST John Johnson wrote: > On Sat, Dec 25, 2021, 5:19 AM Marek Szuba wrote: > > On 24 December 2021 08:48:08 UTC, Pacho Ramos wrote: > > >> > I think =E2=80=9Csecret=E2=80=9D may be too generic and =E2=80=9Cl= ibsecret=E2=80=9D is not ideal in > > >> > case an implemention comes along that is named differently. How ab= out > > >> > =E2=80=9Csecret-service=E2=80=9D? > > >>=20 > > >> I think this is a good idea. > > > > > >And "keyring"? I am not sure if users not familiar with "libsecret" wi= ll > > >understand what "secret*" means in this context > >=20 > > Definitely a good idea. And I second "keyring", seeing as this term is > > also in use on other OSes. > >=20 > > -- > > Marecki >=20 > "keyring" conveys the appropriate meaning, imho. >=20 It seems that keyring won the popular vote. There is now a bug and a PR: https://bugs.gentoo.org/905928 https://github.com/gentoo/gentoo/pull/31035 --nextPart4845040.31r3eYUQgx Content-Type: application/pgp-signature; name="signature.asc" Content-Description: This is a digitally signed message part. Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7Bit -----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE----- iQITBAABCgB9FiEEZD8Ftg7kXelMA262xdaC3679iIgFAmRg/IxfFIAAAAAALgAo aXNzdWVyLWZwckBub3RhdGlvbnMub3BlbnBncC5maWZ0aGhvcnNlbWFuLm5ldDY0 M0YwNUI2MEVFNDVERTk0QzAzNkVCNkM1RDY4MkRGQUVGRDg4ODgACgkQxdaC3679 iIjJlwwAleAKQ6XILZdz2si6uaoQJuIQx68PQIxRaJ0bU1PN4AJTUWX3/hI55IAA qpr0F87QlZ+9/6fY32+FPOXOOEJfCTtnS00vVM4GLh7Obs/OGICasdDPqUe8gnAh YXkkBiq7PwN5lz/AAnduN9Mt0FLIlPVuovDQ+Zd0nEdfRG3fwnHxP3ujfqU6jPuX 8OW3PCuPWltn8Iv6zli+gIf62hzaTaJ9FcSn/nnyUpUAGPYz7hvmhB9ymQVRMGCN DGDyrgZs/imwO8vpQLuYPsJx6VOOzJKMeqgDop3WYULyrqceTGi3pyB/F+bI53GL 4JJ+vR1Esw0hMAZ4UYWtnFQRsTey5IxU4eQaykrrXZ34mm4nTrgoZKGxwt625fos gFGUo1AM5m9k8SG6DlmXAFeUxC2iCF9dGL29Cw6PdaDx0cYwSmQ5V9ei+j5MOMNg 85Mkq2K3LZ4z1Oq46qfRLU+lYXrPiYKk+OgEPqwU5cqXIm1RPJodxK9qXR/dT9Mf T1noGwwg =TC2x -----END PGP SIGNATURE----- --nextPart4845040.31r3eYUQgx--