Re: [gentoo-dev] gentoo's policy on sender id

[Tom Gall <tom_gall@mac.com>]

On Sep 5, 2004, at 9:00 AM, John Davis wrote:

> Hi all -
> Recent [1] announcements [2] from other large projects have prompted
> this inquiry - should Gentoo adopt similar policies regarding Sender ID
> and make a public statement or is it not worth our time?

Personally I wonder how much of the attention with regards to Sender ID  
is more of a dig against micro$oft.  O wait that's the "in" thing to  
do. :-)

But what does saying something really mean?  Would it be somewhat sorta  
like the  xfree86 license change situation?

IE we won't have any package in portage that implements Sender ID?

Regards,

Tom

> 1. http://it.slashdot.org/article.pl?sid=04/09/05/138257&tid=111&tid=1
> 2.
> http://apache.slashdot.org/article.pl?sid=04/09/02/ 
> 1446229&tid=148&tid=155&tid=109&tid=95
> -- 
> John Davis
> Gentoo Linux Developer
> <http://dev.gentoo.org/~zhen>
>
> ----
> GnuPG Public Key: <http://dev.gentoo.org/~zhen/zhen_pub.asc>
> Fingerprint: 4F9E 41F6 D072 5C1A 636C  2D46 B92C 4823 E281 41BB
>
Tom Gall
Gentoo/PPC64 Team Leader
tgall@gentoo.org


--
gentoo-dev@gentoo.org mailing list