From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: from lists.gentoo.org (pigeon.gentoo.org [208.92.234.80]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES256-GCM-SHA384 (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by finch.gentoo.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 09F301382C5 for ; Thu, 15 Apr 2021 17:07:22 +0000 (UTC) Received: from pigeon.gentoo.org (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by pigeon.gentoo.org (Postfix) with SMTP id 7F3DDE0826; Thu, 15 Apr 2021 17:07:18 +0000 (UTC) Received: from smtp.gentoo.org (smtp.gentoo.org [140.211.166.183]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES128-GCM-SHA256 (128/128 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by pigeon.gentoo.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 34BBAE0821 for ; Thu, 15 Apr 2021 17:07:18 +0000 (UTC) Subject: Re: [gentoo-dev] unmasking java 11 on gentoo (for those that maintain packages where java is involved, either directly or conditionally) To: gentoo-dev@lists.gentoo.org References: <8103dc67284bd3fb0f6a792298bec78bce8c64ca.camel@infinera.com> <84d738ebe11b7e2e022e18d2baa3af1c5f143801.camel@infinera.com> <830356b0-5649-ed02-25bc-78a2abb3deda@gentoo.org> <9826dad34c80a38809a5a25de7fd9d414d443bc0.camel@infinera.com> From: =?UTF-8?Q?Miroslav_=c5=a0ulc?= Message-ID: <58122648-eb68-2403-04d1-d450810da16b@gentoo.org> Date: Thu, 15 Apr 2021 19:07:04 +0200 User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (X11; Linux x86_64; rv:78.0) Gecko/20100101 Thunderbird/78.9.1 Precedence: bulk List-Post: List-Help: List-Unsubscribe: List-Subscribe: List-Id: Gentoo Linux mail X-BeenThere: gentoo-dev@lists.gentoo.org Reply-to: gentoo-dev@lists.gentoo.org X-Auto-Response-Suppress: DR, RN, NRN, OOF, AutoReply MIME-Version: 1.0 In-Reply-To: <9826dad34c80a38809a5a25de7fd9d414d443bc0.camel@infinera.com> Content-Type: text/plain; charset=utf-8; format=flowed Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Content-Language: en-US X-Archives-Salt: ba5db108-c822-484e-8ddd-0ecccf2245e6 X-Archives-Hash: b031fd4bf3a0a7202dfad9a4c8e02629 Dne 15. 04. 21 v 18:35 Joakim Tjernlund napsal(a): > Yes, I found the error in dev-java/icedtea-web. Q: Should one use > JDK_HOME or JAVA_HOME in ebuilds? i guess it doesn't matter (at least for packages that inherit java-utils-2.eclass): https://github.com/gentoo/gentoo/blob/master/eclass/java-utils-2.eclass#L2711 > However, BDEPEND vs DEPEND is still outstanding. I don't think it is wrong to use BDEPEND here? > > Also, RDEPEND does not seem to matter, only BDEPEND this thread is about packages inheriting a java eclass, which icedtea-web isn't, so it works in a different way. i never touched that package so cannot give you more details, but you can join us at #gentoo-java@freenode.net and address gyakovlev there. fordfrog