Am 03.05.24 um 06:39 schrieb Sam James:
>
> What we really need is:
> a)https://bugs.gentoo.org/162450  to avoid scaring users;
> b) possibly some level of QA notice to distinguish between "check this
> out" (think e.g. qa-vdb LHS where it _might_ be unused, but not
> necessarily), and "this is definitely wrong"
>
> I am convinced we need a), I am not-at-all convinced we need b) - at
> least not in terms of whether bugs are reported.
>
AFAIS https://bugs.gentoo.org/162450 is not implemented.

Maybe we can agree that the qa-warnings in vdr-eclass make more sense if
i change them to "eawarn" or "einfo"?

In my opinion, most plugins in the vdr context will practically not
develop any further anyway. It is more important to keep the current
status of vdr-software in the ecosystem up to date as well as possible.

So I need a practical useful approach instead of a fundamental
discussion please.