From: NP-Hardass <NP-Hardass@gentoo.org>
To: gentoo-dev@lists.gentoo.org, mgorny@gentoo.org
Subject: Re: [gentoo-dev] Default DOCS for einstalldocs and HACKING file
Date: Thu, 9 Jun 2016 00:54:10 -0400 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <5758F672.10201@gentoo.org> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20160608084019.0ec78917.mgorny@gentoo.org>
[-- Attachment #1.1: Type: text/plain, Size: 1136 bytes --]
On 06/08/2016 02:40 AM, Michał Górny wrote:
> On Tue, 7 Jun 2016 18:50:05 -0400
> NP-Hardass <NP-Hardass@gentoo.org> wrote:
>
>> From what I've seen, HACKING is a fairly common doc in FOSS projects.
>> It doesn't seem to have been included in the default DOCS for
>> einstalldocs in EAPI6. While going through the MATE packages, I noticed
>> that we have quite a few packages that include HACKING in DOCS, so I
>> cannot delete the DOCS array and take advantage of the automagic doc
>> detection feature of einstalldocs.
>>
>> Does anyone know why we omitted this file from the default DOCS? A
>> quick grep of the main repo shows ~370 ebuilds with HACKING listed. Is
>> this file no longer considered worthy of being included by default in
>> our installed docs? If so, looking for advice on whether it is worth
>> keeping or dropping that file from my packages?
>
> File a Future EAPI bug asking to include it in EAPI 7. I don't see
> a reason to omit it by default.
>
Done. Thanks for the suggestion.
https://bugs.gentoo.org/show_bug.cgi?id=585428 in case anyone is interested.
--
NP-Hardass
[-- Attachment #2: OpenPGP digital signature --]
[-- Type: application/pgp-signature, Size: 819 bytes --]
prev parent reply other threads:[~2016-06-09 4:54 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 7+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2016-06-07 22:50 [gentoo-dev] Default DOCS for einstalldocs and HACKING file NP-Hardass
2016-06-07 23:19 ` M. J. Everitt
2016-06-07 23:59 ` Austin English
2016-06-08 6:39 ` Michał Górny
2016-06-08 20:22 ` Daniel Campbell
2016-06-08 6:40 ` Michał Górny
2016-06-09 4:54 ` NP-Hardass [this message]
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=5758F672.10201@gentoo.org \
--to=np-hardass@gentoo.org \
--cc=gentoo-dev@lists.gentoo.org \
--cc=mgorny@gentoo.org \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox