From: "M. J. Everitt" <m.j.everitt@iee.org>
To: gentoo-dev@lists.gentoo.org
Subject: Re: [gentoo-dev] Default DOCS for einstalldocs and HACKING file
Date: Wed, 08 Jun 2016 00:19:47 +0100 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <57575693.5040803@iee.org> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <57574F9D.9040008@gentoo.org>
[-- Attachment #1: Type: text/plain, Size: 1278 bytes --]
On 07/06/16 23:50, NP-Hardass wrote:
> From what I've seen, HACKING is a fairly common doc in FOSS projects.
> It doesn't seem to have been included in the default DOCS for
> einstalldocs in EAPI6. While going through the MATE packages, I noticed
> that we have quite a few packages that include HACKING in DOCS, so I
> cannot delete the DOCS array and take advantage of the automagic doc
> detection feature of einstalldocs.
>
> Does anyone know why we omitted this file from the default DOCS? A
> quick grep of the main repo shows ~370 ebuilds with HACKING listed. Is
> this file no longer considered worthy of being included by default in
> our installed docs? If so, looking for advice on whether it is worth
> keeping or dropping that file from my packages?
>
I made the suggestion a while back in IRC that it would be nice if there
was a way to append to the DOCS array in an ebuild, rather than have to
override it, and remember the standard list every time, or just lose the
extra file(s). Unfortunately I was laughed out of the channel. So,
whilst it would probably be something for another EAPI change .. what do
readers think of the idea of an EXTRA_DOCS variable or similar method
for doing this, for exactly this reason/purpose??
MJE
[-- Attachment #2: OpenPGP digital signature --]
[-- Type: application/pgp-signature, Size: 901 bytes --]
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2016-06-07 23:20 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 7+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2016-06-07 22:50 [gentoo-dev] Default DOCS for einstalldocs and HACKING file NP-Hardass
2016-06-07 23:19 ` M. J. Everitt [this message]
2016-06-07 23:59 ` Austin English
2016-06-08 6:39 ` Michał Górny
2016-06-08 20:22 ` Daniel Campbell
2016-06-08 6:40 ` Michał Górny
2016-06-09 4:54 ` NP-Hardass
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=57575693.5040803@iee.org \
--to=m.j.everitt@iee.org \
--cc=gentoo-dev@lists.gentoo.org \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox