[gentoo-dev] dev-util/nsis: Maintainer request

[gentoo-dev] dev-util/nsis: Maintainer request

[Kristian Fiskerstrand]

[-- Attachment #1.1: Type: text/plain, Size: 416 bytes --]

dev-util/nsis curretly has no maintainer. It has a [critical security
bug filed against it]. Does anyone want to pick it up? if not we'll
start a last rite process for it.

[critical security bug filed against it]
https://bugs.gentoo.org/show_bug.cgi?id=568398
-- 
Kristian Fiskerstrand
OpenPGP certificate reachable at hkp://pool.sks-keyservers.net
fpr:94CB AFDD 3034 5109 5618 35AA 0B7F 8B60 E3ED FAE3


[-- Attachment #2: OpenPGP digital signature --]
[-- Type: application/pgp-signature, Size: 455 bytes --]

Re: [gentoo-dev] dev-util/nsis: Maintainer request

[M. J. Everitt]

[-- Attachment #1: Type: text/plain, Size: 750 bytes --]

On 05/06/16 22:55, Kristian Fiskerstrand wrote:
> dev-util/nsis curretly has no maintainer. It has a [critical security
> bug filed against it]. Does anyone want to pick it up? if not we'll
> start a last rite process for it.
>
> [critical security bug filed against it]
> https://bugs.gentoo.org/show_bug.cgi?id=568398
Per conversation in #g-p-m I'll take this on via proxy if nobody else
volunteers in the next 7 days (w/e 12th June) to start with, as I'm
pretty sure a colleague is using it on a project, and we could do
without losing it from the tree .. !

Quick glance at the project page, and bug suggests revbump, stabilise
and drop old version might cure the existing issue, but will investigate
further.
Cheers,
Michael.


[-- Attachment #2: OpenPGP digital signature --]
[-- Type: application/pgp-signature, Size: 901 bytes --]

Re: [gentoo-dev] dev-util/nsis: Maintainer request

[Alon Bar-Lev]

Hi,
I've revbumped this package.
Regards,
Alon

On 6 June 2016 at 03:23, M. J. Everitt <m.j.everitt@iee.org> wrote:
> On 05/06/16 22:55, Kristian Fiskerstrand wrote:
>> dev-util/nsis curretly has no maintainer. It has a [critical security
>> bug filed against it]. Does anyone want to pick it up? if not we'll
>> start a last rite process for it.
>>
>> [critical security bug filed against it]
>> https://bugs.gentoo.org/show_bug.cgi?id=568398
> Per conversation in #g-p-m I'll take this on via proxy if nobody else
> volunteers in the next 7 days (w/e 12th June) to start with, as I'm
> pretty sure a colleague is using it on a project, and we could do
> without losing it from the tree .. !
>
> Quick glance at the project page, and bug suggests revbump, stabilise
> and drop old version might cure the existing issue, but will investigate
> further.
> Cheers,
> Michael.
>

Re: [gentoo-dev] dev-util/nsis: Maintainer request

[M. J. Everitt]

[-- Attachment #1: Type: text/plain, Size: 999 bytes --]

Cheers Alon,

Michael.
On 12/06/16 12:43, Alon Bar-Lev wrote:
> Hi,
> I've revbumped this package.
> Regards,
> Alon
>
> On 6 June 2016 at 03:23, M. J. Everitt <m.j.everitt@iee.org> wrote:
>> On 05/06/16 22:55, Kristian Fiskerstrand wrote:
>>> dev-util/nsis curretly has no maintainer. It has a [critical security
>>> bug filed against it]. Does anyone want to pick it up? if not we'll
>>> start a last rite process for it.
>>>
>>> [critical security bug filed against it]
>>> https://bugs.gentoo.org/show_bug.cgi?id=568398
>> Per conversation in #g-p-m I'll take this on via proxy if nobody else
>> volunteers in the next 7 days (w/e 12th June) to start with, as I'm
>> pretty sure a colleague is using it on a project, and we could do
>> without losing it from the tree .. !
>>
>> Quick glance at the project page, and bug suggests revbump, stabilise
>> and drop old version might cure the existing issue, but will investigate
>> further.
>> Cheers,
>> Michael.
>>



[-- Attachment #2: OpenPGP digital signature --]
[-- Type: application/pgp-signature, Size: 901 bytes --]

Re: [gentoo-dev] dev-util/nsis: Maintainer request

[Alon Bar-Lev]

Can you please check it out?
I had no time nor setup.

On 12 June 2016 at 14:49, M. J. Everitt <m.j.everitt@iee.org> wrote:
> Cheers Alon,
>
> Michael.
> On 12/06/16 12:43, Alon Bar-Lev wrote:
>> Hi,
>> I've revbumped this package.
>> Regards,
>> Alon
>>
>> On 6 June 2016 at 03:23, M. J. Everitt <m.j.everitt@iee.org> wrote:
>>> On 05/06/16 22:55, Kristian Fiskerstrand wrote:
>>>> dev-util/nsis curretly has no maintainer. It has a [critical security
>>>> bug filed against it]. Does anyone want to pick it up? if not we'll
>>>> start a last rite process for it.
>>>>
>>>> [critical security bug filed against it]
>>>> https://bugs.gentoo.org/show_bug.cgi?id=568398
>>> Per conversation in #g-p-m I'll take this on via proxy if nobody else
>>> volunteers in the next 7 days (w/e 12th June) to start with, as I'm
>>> pretty sure a colleague is using it on a project, and we could do
>>> without losing it from the tree .. !
>>>
>>> Quick glance at the project page, and bug suggests revbump, stabilise
>>> and drop old version might cure the existing issue, but will investigate
>>> further.
>>> Cheers,
>>> Michael.
>>>
>
>

Re: [gentoo-dev] dev-util/nsis: Maintainer request

[M. J. Everitt]

[-- Attachment #1: Type: text/plain, Size: 1307 bytes --]

I'll see what I can do .. possibly not today ..
Cheers,
Michael.

On 12/06/16 12:50, Alon Bar-Lev wrote:
> Can you please check it out?
> I had no time nor setup.
>
> On 12 June 2016 at 14:49, M. J. Everitt <m.j.everitt@iee.org> wrote:
>> Cheers Alon,
>>
>> Michael.
>> On 12/06/16 12:43, Alon Bar-Lev wrote:
>>> Hi,
>>> I've revbumped this package.
>>> Regards,
>>> Alon
>>>
>>> On 6 June 2016 at 03:23, M. J. Everitt <m.j.everitt@iee.org> wrote:
>>>> On 05/06/16 22:55, Kristian Fiskerstrand wrote:
>>>>> dev-util/nsis curretly has no maintainer. It has a [critical security
>>>>> bug filed against it]. Does anyone want to pick it up? if not we'll
>>>>> start a last rite process for it.
>>>>>
>>>>> [critical security bug filed against it]
>>>>> https://bugs.gentoo.org/show_bug.cgi?id=568398
>>>> Per conversation in #g-p-m I'll take this on via proxy if nobody else
>>>> volunteers in the next 7 days (w/e 12th June) to start with, as I'm
>>>> pretty sure a colleague is using it on a project, and we could do
>>>> without losing it from the tree .. !
>>>>
>>>> Quick glance at the project page, and bug suggests revbump, stabilise
>>>> and drop old version might cure the existing issue, but will investigate
>>>> further.
>>>> Cheers,
>>>> Michael.
>>>>
>>



[-- Attachment #2: OpenPGP digital signature --]
[-- Type: application/pgp-signature, Size: 901 bytes --]