From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: from lists.gentoo.org (pigeon.gentoo.org [208.92.234.80]) by finch.gentoo.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 14BEF59CB2 for ; Sat, 16 Apr 2016 19:41:32 +0000 (UTC) Received: from pigeon.gentoo.org (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by pigeon.gentoo.org (Postfix) with SMTP id 5084521C117; Sat, 16 Apr 2016 19:41:24 +0000 (UTC) Received: from smtp.gentoo.org (smtp.gentoo.org [140.211.166.183]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES256-GCM-SHA384 (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by pigeon.gentoo.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 5261321C0B5 for ; Sat, 16 Apr 2016 19:41:23 +0000 (UTC) Received: from greysprite.dite (cpe-74-77-145-97.buffalo.res.rr.com [74.77.145.97]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES128-GCM-SHA256 (128/128 bits)) (No client certificate requested) (Authenticated sender: blueness) by smtp.gentoo.org (Postfix) with ESMTPSA id E3F18340754 for ; Sat, 16 Apr 2016 19:41:21 +0000 (UTC) Subject: Re: [gentoo-dev] Re: [gentoo-commits] repo/gentoo:master commit in: eclass/ To: gentoo-dev@lists.gentoo.org References: <1460833703.ad0c2ab2bdbd34f4550e49c56cfd5974d6a2c07a.blueness@gentoo> <20160416210556.08317672.mgorny@gentoo.org> <57129018.6070906@gentoo.org> From: "Anthony G. Basile" Message-ID: <5712955F.4080602@gentoo.org> Date: Sat, 16 Apr 2016 15:41:19 -0400 User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (Macintosh; Intel Mac OS X 10.11; rv:38.0) Gecko/20100101 Thunderbird/38.7.2 Precedence: bulk List-Post: List-Help: List-Unsubscribe: List-Subscribe: List-Id: Gentoo Linux mail X-BeenThere: gentoo-dev@lists.gentoo.org Reply-to: gentoo-dev@lists.gentoo.org MIME-Version: 1.0 In-Reply-To: <57129018.6070906@gentoo.org> Content-Type: text/plain; charset=utf-8 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 8bit X-Archives-Salt: 3d1e850e-3689-45e9-94d9-afe32099579f X-Archives-Hash: 72bc3bfdec4683cea7de407f90feb666 On 4/16/16 3:18 PM, Anthony G. Basile wrote: > On 4/16/16 3:16 PM, Rich Freeman wrote: >> On Sat, Apr 16, 2016 at 3:05 PM, Michał Górny wrote: >>> >>> Congratulations! ... But why would anyone... >> >> Not really picking on you in particular, but this is not the first >> snarky comment on a commit we've seen today. >> >> If somebody makes a mistake, just point it out. I think we can all >> appreciate that glibc shouldn't break even in ~arch, and that libressl >> needs a USE flag due to the whole ABI situation. >> >> I can't remember the last time I just factually pointed out a mistake >> to somebody that they didn't just fix it. When there are real >> controversies then there are ways to escalate. We don't need to >> manufacture them out of accidents. >> > > I know it will cause rebuild but we are moving towards openssl:0= > dependency. Please look at the discussion on bug #569112. > Sorry I originally thought mgorny was referring to the added slot operators, but he meant the USE flags. -- Anthony G. Basile, Ph.D. Gentoo Linux Developer [Hardened] E-Mail : blueness@gentoo.org GnuPG FP : 1FED FAD9 D82C 52A5 3BAB DC79 9384 FA6E F52D 4BBA GnuPG ID : F52D4BBA