From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970
Return-Path: <gentoo-dev+bounces-75207-garchives=archives.gentoo.org@lists.gentoo.org>
Received: from lists.gentoo.org (pigeon.gentoo.org [208.92.234.80])
by finch.gentoo.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 14B5259CAF
for <garchives@archives.gentoo.org>; Sat, 9 Apr 2016 18:42:46 +0000 (UTC)
Received: from pigeon.gentoo.org (localhost [127.0.0.1])
by pigeon.gentoo.org (Postfix) with SMTP id 0C97C21C0B6;
Sat, 9 Apr 2016 18:42:41 +0000 (UTC)
Received: from mail-yw0-f177.google.com (mail-yw0-f177.google.com [209.85.161.177])
(using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES256-GCM-SHA384 (256/256 bits))
(No client certificate requested)
by pigeon.gentoo.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 9674921C029
for <gentoo-dev@lists.gentoo.org>; Sat, 9 Apr 2016 18:42:39 +0000 (UTC)
Received: by mail-yw0-f177.google.com with SMTP id t10so168489315ywa.0
for <gentoo-dev@lists.gentoo.org>; Sat, 09 Apr 2016 11:42:39 -0700 (PDT)
DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed;
d=gmail.com; s=20120113;
h=subject:to:references:from:message-id:date:user-agent:mime-version
:in-reply-to:content-transfer-encoding;
bh=7qP890SCwIdHsbzgDL2TteXxsTeVOFZq5LPwwL3L498=;
b=O7buXip5puPsvOwoKsgxKobmrj6y4ZIeOggQNEqwpF4NOZVfKdAUnqaOYqLv5lvmH4
Jam9kgFU2koxL8DEdBxeWDyswI4sIkhI+GPGCftO+kQheW/ZCfmQg6KhlY3gHUFoVaqu
TT62U52jVradVf5gwDVo1JzJ0c7tMUGFm9zF6M5lwQ0Md8R+ZDTTrwwdp5xHfKNxv+Az
YDIboeoXFXz1j5O0WNdH2zLD5RQYS2asbyH3z8MfdLyzCxy23dvhQgF+xGMEZ18OSZn4
oVJ+P686MsXstupoGJ6gITVO92h+EruUwuP713bRqgDV9Gg/mgEbMDez5lz7kr05rjFF
X5tg==
X-Google-DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed;
d=1e100.net; s=20130820;
h=x-gm-message-state:subject:to:references:from:message-id:date
:user-agent:mime-version:in-reply-to:content-transfer-encoding;
bh=7qP890SCwIdHsbzgDL2TteXxsTeVOFZq5LPwwL3L498=;
b=a6wYqGuMBMt9J97QyjczwgWRR92ewyywHvrcjnD56xOS08Uw7iVMRNO7oGujPmBDhM
cY01llOkKTmFzh3MKw5AY05GOLrLYrdxCjw7wQwYBofITcIWCbFY+Ey0OwuQL5WpW7V0
cJEku5ptwu5QSleGXMSh/XqBZdDbj9dZMPqAepzUIuRxUmQbdOEnmXXdCNLyFde+Kjz+
FS1Nr5wh2XlU4x5OI7CyCxaO/eAGKhNoHcV5/WD4qNby+YcRyGY7dCWoMVRgO+tP5qpK
CdAK1X1QIEclzv5oTVmO33kMI4bf6JlcvqU7q8cJrYxawKm55VGDKL3gAGCNbKu+7rgn
S4Jg==
X-Gm-Message-State: AD7BkJKSbx8aZD9kKo+m6mO3AGWCBkvyr3L8K7ejXsmSe6yZ3qNL6vzzF3XCv4Knso8eVw==
X-Received: by 10.129.78.22 with SMTP id c22mr7449921ywb.136.1460227358737;
Sat, 09 Apr 2016 11:42:38 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from [192.168.2.5] (adsl-74-240-55-145.jan.bellsouth.net. [74.240.55.145])
by smtp.gmail.com with ESMTPSA id c67sm10651817ywb.14.2016.04.09.11.42.37
(version=TLSv1/SSLv3 cipher=OTHER);
Sat, 09 Apr 2016 11:42:37 -0700 (PDT)
Subject: Re: [gentoo-dev] usr merge
To: gentoo-dev@lists.gentoo.org
References: <57087E0D.3090502@gmail.com> <20160409053230.GA16529@waltdnes.org>
<CAGfcS_miZ1mx7JuyEYpXpM1Ttf-BGYes4=a-F0YnB6rrx823mA@mail.gmail.com>
<20160409160938.GA17530@waltdnes.org>
<20160409171508.72be3c6e@symphony.aura-online.co.uk>
From: Dale <rdalek1967@gmail.com>
Message-ID: <57094D1D.30801@gmail.com>
Date: Sat, 9 Apr 2016 13:42:37 -0500
User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (X11; Linux x86_64; rv:41.0) Gecko/20100101
Firefox/41.0 SeaMonkey/2.38
Precedence: bulk
List-Post: <mailto:gentoo-dev@lists.gentoo.org>
List-Help: <mailto:gentoo-dev+help@lists.gentoo.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <mailto:gentoo-dev+unsubscribe@lists.gentoo.org>
List-Subscribe: <mailto:gentoo-dev+subscribe@lists.gentoo.org>
List-Id: Gentoo Linux mail <gentoo-dev.gentoo.org>
X-BeenThere: gentoo-dev@lists.gentoo.org
Reply-to: gentoo-dev@lists.gentoo.org
MIME-Version: 1.0
In-Reply-To: <20160409171508.72be3c6e@symphony.aura-online.co.uk>
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1
Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable
X-Archives-Salt: da00d689-f11d-41ae-87d0-0d3b97c9dfaf
X-Archives-Hash: ca841e281faf6e7cd7513ba8b5dfe492
James Le Cuirot wrote:
> On Sat, 9 Apr 2016 12:09:38 -0400
> waltdnes@waltdnes.org wrote:
>
>>> I never really got the mentality that using an initramfs is a
>>> burden. =20
>> One more piece of software that can go wrong. You have to
>> maintain+configure it; e.g. sync software and library versions with
>> what's on the rest of the system.
> Errm, have you ever actually used dracut?
>
> dracut --kver 4.5
>
> Wow, that was hard! It requires zero configuration and that's true even=
> if you've got LVM on top of LUKS on top of RAID or something equally
> complex. If you're already running that kernel version, you don't even
> need to specify it.
>
FYI. I've had those to fail too. As Walt said, just one more thing to
fail.=20
Dale
:-) :-)=20