From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: from lists.gentoo.org (pigeon.gentoo.org [208.92.234.80]) by finch.gentoo.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 3891659CAF for ; Thu, 7 Apr 2016 18:32:25 +0000 (UTC) Received: from pigeon.gentoo.org (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by pigeon.gentoo.org (Postfix) with SMTP id C509121C04C; Thu, 7 Apr 2016 18:32:16 +0000 (UTC) Received: from mout.kundenserver.de (mout.kundenserver.de [212.227.17.13]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES256-GCM-SHA384 (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by pigeon.gentoo.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 5917621C02E for ; Thu, 7 Apr 2016 18:32:14 +0000 (UTC) Received: from [192.168.6.147] ([91.125.237.217]) by mrelayeu.kundenserver.de (mreue103) with ESMTPSA (Nemesis) id 0M1QSH-1bhRjw16qX-00tVOo for ; Thu, 07 Apr 2016 20:32:13 +0200 Message-ID: <5706A7A6.3080402@iee.org> Date: Thu, 07 Apr 2016 19:32:06 +0100 From: "M. J. Everitt" User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (X11; Linux x86_64; rv:24.0) Gecko/20100101 Thunderbird/24.6.0 Precedence: bulk List-Post: List-Help: List-Unsubscribe: List-Subscribe: List-Id: Gentoo Linux mail X-BeenThere: gentoo-dev@lists.gentoo.org Reply-to: gentoo-dev@lists.gentoo.org MIME-Version: 1.0 To: gentoo-dev@lists.gentoo.org Subject: Re: [gentoo-dev] usr merge References: <570312c8.1469ca0a.30985.5db1@mx.google.com> <570523FD.3040703@iee.org> <570530D4.4030803@gentoo.org> <20160406204310.GA11167@whubbs1.gaikai.biz> <763f78cb-66f7-484f-bb64-a182f2747d54@gentoo.org> <57067172.49cbca0a.693b1.ffff9909@mx.google.com> <20160407154636.GA26596@whubbs1.gaikai.biz> In-Reply-To: X-Enigmail-Version: 1.6 OpenPGP: id=93C22371 Content-Type: multipart/signed; micalg=pgp-sha256; protocol="application/pgp-signature"; boundary="XP3Gg4it8q1FG0XLfc3IbKruWUChoqaNl" X-Provags-ID: V03:K0:7Ju9jehngahocuuUCjzPgrmofKqOqKPuweELT+tJjLb77DBelRX LpXJfyQR5bX3Z4PvlsLWEid9sL/dY3ARyCsAEz9C3ztrpDSEb41sMdAfBpRN3YPVlG4XEnE O/916H0GQHePmp2kMv7FQpm0DwIkJ/P5YdcwjttEgJSvpUdFvajSODmRw2pOTlZJe7Iy8Hj d83/pHDSuvbOdy3v8t1ig== X-UI-Out-Filterresults: notjunk:1;V01:K0:27Gu+L7w4Qc=:t1u7DquH0zal0618mRD0KI TTTXxOs6iGpY+GrauNL16m072D7nhV5uNIIfvSw/QVOI8HbG6hiaUtZ6MVuDmG4Ogg8UvjKHI TpaXi/wt1uyqZ5PpBhxNuBJ+kHsbuvRQLsNdl4eyEtK1I6JZ8rVF4QhgCOa8b30froTRFfb1Y beL4KfTKPRtDAM/PUVWn8TqxarySXAx50jAh2oIOD8VvF/G4VwnDym+Uofn/v+dVzDCw7WP6X UOBPcvTI6wJylnMRn8+kNG+VOVmHWCXCQig/SOH9CoAMRJZtndV4V+GCIXjqw2BvKi2I5xD02 TVTgtYXQ19OQjOHAlPLXJKfal53wZoh0moWbE5C3DKczDeV7WoCIpwFbgROabEJj2W7kvQzIV F2yZE6t7N1EqRKMiOwuk+8FPfFl2KmjZ95cxFC7A8cKae1w9Uz5vUj2+HxgTW5QItnMxfFPJU qSGeQyUpaKbiGaiT96yzahh1v7woQBSCRxpTkuaDMolLt0VAHcgEKjMe3sM3cId9hcbNtDL86 Bcb5foPy345AtxFkYguP8j2jTqhPGKTriPcVo0o29mdiBiWklTJonuX7USE0UF3n+TO/1CUe+ wsX+svBsr8yBSkj2DdYCHkQVxjp9dz4lFF+8Gw2PaungcbzrYJ/3ZXrDOyLtGkDnZH2TvXf5/ rF+WblJXTD6SI7pWLnCWH1XFJHq91DAVanIklji4ye2C9e8ZhRAS6OooXsG8AotPTaZQ= X-Archives-Salt: fce1561e-e099-4d84-ab5c-ed9718c93bc4 X-Archives-Hash: 0ec91d5ae2a7b1ab3ec566ceb19efd80 This is an OpenPGP/MIME signed message (RFC 4880 and 3156) --XP3Gg4it8q1FG0XLfc3IbKruWUChoqaNl Content-Type: text/plain; charset=UTF-8 Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable On 07/04/16 17:36, Alexis Ballier wrote: > On Thursday, April 7, 2016 6:22:16 PM CEST, Rich Freeman wrote: >> Again, I don't see this as a reason not to make it optional, but I >> suspect that we will find bugs here from time to time which users who >> run with the split /usr will have to report/fix. > > > Considering the advantages of usr-merge are rather specific IMHO but > risks during the migration are high, I think you're optimistic on the > user base of usr-merged systems :) > > Heck, it hasn't happened yet because there hasn't been such a big need > for it. > In the spirit of hearing arguments for/against .. could someone with the appropriate 'fu' throw up a quick survey for those on this ML (and/or possibly the g-users?) to indicate a preference for a change to a flattened-/usr system? I did think re: the eudev "debate" that it was really hard to quantify the opinion for and against a change, and take it away from the vocal people that obviously feel passionately about their cause :) . --XP3Gg4it8q1FG0XLfc3IbKruWUChoqaNl Content-Type: application/pgp-signature; name="signature.asc" Content-Description: OpenPGP digital signature Content-Disposition: attachment; filename="signature.asc" -----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE----- Version: GnuPG v2.0.22 (GNU/Linux) Comment: Using GnuPG with Thunderbird - http://www.enigmail.net/ iQIcBAEBCAAGBQJXBqesAAoJEEwwM0+TwiNxer0P/Rf67HWKust7V6NXW4Teua0f Nk7AxlOzzXDsbqEc1pU0KNEE6Ijh/4Kdd51fxSvxdpad1MxuJdXwxaj6PL32mrLh pE2vf1kC8+3sU+W4qWQSmwMV2AGoA7qauSCSzVZa9lmXwbYuULKmX2Etkdxj3QN4 yeaKIIsO7/EPU2Mh2xR5Z+BUnu4rcsb8Uvg1gFZ/ZTYWroPrSf2pFt3+9AggaMoQ aoQ5Qu25VbV50zB9/qR8fb/MD2D5QLi6+J9usIMBxXqQw7VHFO1IgRp4wek+LjFM 5vWpFDqiDezqS9agBKMipQ5TW2aFjQA0A4NeNokyNFiIwL1ihWXwVUWpRv3WLs20 cgNmgRYsxOk717Mk05dsI1larAWH0NUatVFMlsgAV3+1x7MCUheyYcjoE9iAVORy FECpjWdpNkXlFmny3pV/sXgdfiPLi5u/KJjgw1KCe33yvuXI/Re+JykKk9cZvlWf 2IgDOEUjPDc6LWaQlnaxCJv9fcj427a8gYyyuL45ewnYhfcyK/L01rO2NYmimpRZ UqQTCqb0fBRLz21+GX/hodf6A+eL7KbZA+fs0eQro+NyW2MDi5+4ND3f9z8Gfehk glwVPEe3LI28YdhJldy69p+ujdLPqbpRLCivcRVgAfmqJLdxyV2/7+BQ/zIy6MHg ClPRWgXZ5Kb8nlYlQmbl =2QJV -----END PGP SIGNATURE----- --XP3Gg4it8q1FG0XLfc3IbKruWUChoqaNl--