From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: from lists.gentoo.org (pigeon.gentoo.org [208.92.234.80]) by finch.gentoo.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 5F70C59CA3 for ; Sat, 12 Mar 2016 18:01:51 +0000 (UTC) Received: from pigeon.gentoo.org (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by pigeon.gentoo.org (Postfix) with SMTP id 6630A21C04F; Sat, 12 Mar 2016 18:01:43 +0000 (UTC) Received: from smtp.gentoo.org (smtp.gentoo.org [140.211.166.183]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES256-GCM-SHA384 (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by pigeon.gentoo.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 72B8D21C015 for ; Sat, 12 Mar 2016 18:01:42 +0000 (UTC) Received: from [10.100.0.6] (host-37-191-220-247.lynet.no [37.191.220.247]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES128-GCM-SHA256 (128/128 bits)) (No client certificate requested) (Authenticated sender: k_f) by smtp.gentoo.org (Postfix) with ESMTPSA id 34CD0340B98 for ; Sat, 12 Mar 2016 18:01:40 +0000 (UTC) Subject: Re: [gentoo-dev] Repoman rewrite stage3. Migrate check data to the tree References: <20160310183007.027bb5f1.dolsen@gentoo.org> <20160310184031.4c9dd658@gentoo.org> <20160311103529.64300173.dolsen@gentoo.org> To: gentoo-dev@lists.gentoo.org From: Kristian Fiskerstrand Message-ID: <56E4597C.7080908@gentoo.org> Date: Sat, 12 Mar 2016 19:01:32 +0100 User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (X11; Linux x86_64; rv:38.0) Gecko/20100101 Thunderbird/38.6.0 Precedence: bulk List-Post: List-Help: List-Unsubscribe: List-Subscribe: List-Id: Gentoo Linux mail X-BeenThere: gentoo-dev@lists.gentoo.org Reply-to: gentoo-dev@lists.gentoo.org MIME-Version: 1.0 In-Reply-To: <20160311103529.64300173.dolsen@gentoo.org> Content-Type: text/plain; charset=utf-8 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-Archives-Salt: ad1864d6-d9e2-4933-bab4-c4714c0a4501 X-Archives-Hash: 142b88f8a516641631ac8a8171eab1f7 -----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE----- Hash: SHA512 On 03/11/2016 07:35 PM, Brian Dolbec wrote: > On Thu, 10 Mar 2016 18:40:31 -0800 Patrick McLean > wrote: > >> On Thu, 10 Mar 2016 18:30:07 -0800 Brian Dolbec >> wrote: >> YAML - like JSON but made to be edited/read by humans (comment >> support is a big feature). Also valid JSON is valid YAML. Also >> can be validated just like JSON can. > > OK, I just had a closer look at yaml. It does look easier for > humans to edit and read. And seems to have the same data type > flexibility. Maybe not quite as many languages have libs for it. > But I don't think that is an issue for this data. > Yaml should be well supported so indeed, wouldn't expect any issues. > > I also want to separate the repoman release from the main portage > release. This will have several advantages. > Sounds reasonable - -- Kristian Fiskerstrand OpenPGP certificate reachable at hkp://pool.sks-keyservers.net fpr:94CB AFDD 3034 5109 5618 35AA 0B7F 8B60 E3ED FAE3 -----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE----- iQEcBAEBCgAGBQJW5Fl4AAoJECULev7WN52FDlQH/16B/DG09LOJnJiVeMhsCVYe MpvsPy4EJfzzAmqgYJhKY4NxD3/X/Y0CbMlO2o1C65WtaO6B85DdzCYuV44lq4Wd EujeJT5dveRU/uihEIPU9P45yLiHd/3iUJ6p0mu2f+OxcVXbEubuf16o4J9j2nmJ 4p3xhOjPoYUlFKalDN2dNEy+JpAB/0gFjnmO5HMyhgnwnxj6o7SLHBLANBm4bReA m6CpmKxoxVpQ88c+xEJz9/X/FjtMVEFixVDphA9zrv1MEMh1K5RuDat0Y2U5BuYT 71/M8AvG+2B64hSmM22EwK/Wk/mzddFQrwYahFfDofd42jYYIQw18gd5t76j6es= =FNfI -----END PGP SIGNATURE-----