From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: from lists.gentoo.org (pigeon.gentoo.org [208.92.234.80]) by finch.gentoo.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 0F97C1384B4 for ; Mon, 4 Jan 2016 16:42:44 +0000 (UTC) Received: from pigeon.gentoo.org (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by pigeon.gentoo.org (Postfix) with SMTP id A93A8E0881; Mon, 4 Jan 2016 16:42:35 +0000 (UTC) Received: from smtp.gentoo.org (smtp.gentoo.org [140.211.166.183]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher AECDH-AES256-SHA (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by pigeon.gentoo.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id B4B72E086A for ; Mon, 4 Jan 2016 16:42:34 +0000 (UTC) Received: from [192.168.1.100] (c-98-218-46-55.hsd1.md.comcast.net [98.218.46.55]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES128-GCM-SHA256 (128/128 bits)) (No client certificate requested) (Authenticated sender: mjo) by smtp.gentoo.org (Postfix) with ESMTPSA id 5081934076D for ; Mon, 4 Jan 2016 16:42:33 +0000 (UTC) Subject: Re: [gentoo-dev] News item: Apache "-D PHP5" needs update to "-D PHP" To: gentoo-dev@lists.gentoo.org References: <5689BC34.5000006@gentoo.org> <20160104114537.392b9971@shanghai.paradoxon.rec> <20160104144036.1083a3d1.mgorny@gentoo.org> <568A8DA4.8000901@gentoo.org> <20160104154245.27599.qmail@stuge.se> <568A9592.5090401@gentoo.org> <20160104161153.30168.qmail@stuge.se> From: Michael Orlitzky X-Enigmail-Draft-Status: N1110 Message-ID: <568AA12D.7090807@gentoo.org> Date: Mon, 4 Jan 2016 11:43:25 -0500 User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (X11; Linux x86_64; rv:38.0) Gecko/20100101 Thunderbird/38.4.0 Precedence: bulk List-Post: List-Help: List-Unsubscribe: List-Subscribe: List-Id: Gentoo Linux mail X-BeenThere: gentoo-dev@lists.gentoo.org Reply-to: gentoo-dev@lists.gentoo.org MIME-Version: 1.0 In-Reply-To: <20160104161153.30168.qmail@stuge.se> Content-Type: text/plain; charset=utf-8 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-Archives-Salt: 53bf96f5-d6a9-47fa-8d50-d5c9022b511f X-Archives-Hash: c483109b39f08227d6c250e0cb3d5de7 On 01/04/2016 11:11 AM, Peter Stuge wrote: > > So pkg_postinst for >=eselect-php-0.8.1 should say something, but > ideally also the invocation - but I don't know if eselect-php is also > code or only data managed by eselect? The pkg_postinst is already there. The eselect-php routines are bash code so theoretically we can do anything we want. How do people feel about making eselect-php spit out a warning every time the apache2 module is messed with? >> >> Which init script? > > For Apache. > >> You don't want to e.g. kill working php-5.x installations for people >> who have apache keyworded ~arch. > > IMO that would be a much lesser evil than serving source in another > case, as long as it is clear how to unkill (sed s,PHP5,PHP,) the setup. > It wouldn't be that simple; at the very least, those people would have to keyword eselect-php, upgrade it, run it, and fix their config. To do that properly would make eselect-php a dependency of the new apache, and that's wrong.