From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: from lists.gentoo.org (pigeon.gentoo.org [208.92.234.80]) by finch.gentoo.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 221FD1384B4 for ; Sun, 13 Dec 2015 17:39:37 +0000 (UTC) Received: from pigeon.gentoo.org (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by pigeon.gentoo.org (Postfix) with SMTP id 4163F21C0AC; Sun, 13 Dec 2015 17:39:27 +0000 (UTC) Received: from smtp.gentoo.org (smtp.gentoo.org [140.211.166.183]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher AECDH-AES256-SHA (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by pigeon.gentoo.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 58E1221C061 for ; Sun, 13 Dec 2015 17:39:26 +0000 (UTC) Received: from [192.168.178.23] (ip5f5af621.dynamic.kabel-deutschland.de [95.90.246.33]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES128-GCM-SHA256 (128/128 bits)) (No client certificate requested) (Authenticated sender: patrick) by smtp.gentoo.org (Postfix) with ESMTPSA id EEA53340861 for ; Sun, 13 Dec 2015 17:39:24 +0000 (UTC) Subject: Re: [gentoo-dev] repo/gentoo.git, or how committing is challenging To: gentoo-dev@lists.gentoo.org References: <566DACB3.2010105@gentoo.org> From: Patrick Lauer Message-ID: <566DAD2F.1010100@gentoo.org> Date: Sun, 13 Dec 2015 18:38:55 +0100 User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (X11; Linux x86_64; rv:38.0) Gecko/20100101 Thunderbird/38.4.0 Precedence: bulk List-Post: List-Help: List-Unsubscribe: List-Subscribe: List-Id: Gentoo Linux mail X-BeenThere: gentoo-dev@lists.gentoo.org Reply-to: gentoo-dev@lists.gentoo.org MIME-Version: 1.0 In-Reply-To: <566DACB3.2010105@gentoo.org> Content-Type: text/plain; charset=utf-8 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-Archives-Salt: 68d0d94b-7304-4342-b616-aa8b841a6664 X-Archives-Hash: 65eb6aa2b5877ff9a3a238bf8cc03386 On 12/13/2015 06:36 PM, Patrick Lauer wrote: > So apparently we're signing things with gpg now And a related question: How would I actually verify the signatures in a meaningful way? ... and why is that not default then.