From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: from lists.gentoo.org (pigeon.gentoo.org [208.92.234.80]) by finch.gentoo.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 459F01384B4 for ; Wed, 11 Nov 2015 14:42:24 +0000 (UTC) Received: from pigeon.gentoo.org (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by pigeon.gentoo.org (Postfix) with SMTP id B778B21C063; Wed, 11 Nov 2015 14:42:13 +0000 (UTC) Received: from smtp.gentoo.org (smtp.gentoo.org [140.211.166.183]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher AECDH-AES256-SHA (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by pigeon.gentoo.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id DAE7621C03D for ; Wed, 11 Nov 2015 14:42:07 +0000 (UTC) Received: from eris.local (dynamic-adsl-84-221-90-242.clienti.tiscali.it [84.221.90.242]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES128-GCM-SHA256 (128/128 bits)) (No client certificate requested) (Authenticated sender: lu_zero) by smtp.gentoo.org (Postfix) with ESMTPSA id 088CF340504 for ; Wed, 11 Nov 2015 14:42:05 +0000 (UTC) Subject: Re: [gentoo-dev] Re: [gentoo-commits] repo/gentoo:master commit in: eclass/ To: gentoo-dev@lists.gentoo.org References: <1446206629.df8e399c9bac2dc30d7cf69c2462a81729a3ae69.jlec@gentoo> <20151030182008.44e0c324.mgorny@gentoo.org> <20151031070621.GO5154@vapier.lan> <20151031090843.19fee262.mgorny@gentoo.org> <20151110235303.GQ5154@vapier.lan> <20151111100944.77313cc6.mgorny@gentoo.org> From: Luca Barbato Message-ID: <564353B8.8060109@gentoo.org> Date: Wed, 11 Nov 2015 15:42:00 +0100 User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (Macintosh; Intel Mac OS X 10.11; rv:42.0) Gecko/20100101 Thunderbird/42.0 Precedence: bulk List-Post: List-Help: List-Unsubscribe: List-Subscribe: List-Id: Gentoo Linux mail X-BeenThere: gentoo-dev@lists.gentoo.org Reply-to: gentoo-dev@lists.gentoo.org MIME-Version: 1.0 In-Reply-To: <20151111100944.77313cc6.mgorny@gentoo.org> Content-Type: text/plain; charset=utf-8 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 8bit X-Archives-Salt: 8046feb7-e707-4d6b-a748-8fc3d33095fd X-Archives-Hash: b1821a823cf4fec14a29243cf4a5b8cc On 11/11/15 10:09, Michał Górny wrote: > I'd rather use the old standard 80. Minus 8 characters for friendly > e-mail quoting, which is also kinda 'old standard'. You can suggest as above, with this tone, and probably you would get some consensus. Personally I think 80col is nice since you can have three-way side by side diff in most of the current screens. You can deliver your point effectively w/out screaming and name calling. lu