From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: from lists.gentoo.org (pigeon.gentoo.org [208.92.234.80]) by finch.gentoo.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 3869C1384B4 for ; Wed, 4 Nov 2015 17:23:58 +0000 (UTC) Received: from pigeon.gentoo.org (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by pigeon.gentoo.org (Postfix) with SMTP id B085921C056; Wed, 4 Nov 2015 17:23:52 +0000 (UTC) Received: from smtp.gentoo.org (smtp.gentoo.org [140.211.166.183]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher AECDH-AES256-SHA (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by pigeon.gentoo.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id D57BD21C013 for ; Wed, 4 Nov 2015 17:23:51 +0000 (UTC) Received: from [192.168.0.12] (aftr-37-201-212-73.unity-media.net [37.201.212.73]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES128-GCM-SHA256 (128/128 bits)) (No client certificate requested) (Authenticated sender: hasufell) by smtp.gentoo.org (Postfix) with ESMTPSA id DC83A3405C3 for ; Wed, 4 Nov 2015 17:23:50 +0000 (UTC) Subject: Re: [gentoo-dev] ChangeLog To: gentoo-dev@lists.gentoo.org References: <5636029F.1020304@gentoo.org> <5636127B.10102@gentoo.org> <56361381.9070609@gentoo.org> <56361493.9020606@gentoo.org> <20151101144719.223ec1f9@gentoo.org> <56361950.3010101@gentoo.org> <20151104115607.b0fda71683cab25d1a337169@gentoo.org> <563A2FDC.1090801@gentoo.org> <563A3341.3040504@gentoo.org> <563A346D.7040603@gentoo.org> <563A35DD.3040402@gentoo.org> From: hasufell Message-ID: <563A3F21.5050306@gentoo.org> Date: Wed, 4 Nov 2015 18:23:45 +0100 User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (X11; Linux x86_64; rv:38.0) Gecko/20100101 Thunderbird/38.3.0 Precedence: bulk List-Post: List-Help: List-Unsubscribe: List-Subscribe: List-Id: Gentoo Linux mail X-BeenThere: gentoo-dev@lists.gentoo.org Reply-to: gentoo-dev@lists.gentoo.org MIME-Version: 1.0 In-Reply-To: <563A35DD.3040402@gentoo.org> Content-Type: text/plain; charset=utf-8 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 8bit X-Archives-Salt: 2472df84-4919-4b66-b1cb-eeef5fed1014 X-Archives-Hash: 773878ab869ceec355887f62be0d01bc On 11/04/2015 05:44 PM, Chí-Thanh Christopher Nguyễn wrote: > hasufell schrieb: > >> If you want to improve the situation, go talk to git upstream >> and send patches. > > Or do what Andrew suggested should happen. > > If you want to break the whole git workflow yes. Good suggestion.