From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: from lists.gentoo.org (pigeon.gentoo.org [208.92.234.80]) by finch.gentoo.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id B9B6F1384B4 for ; Mon, 2 Nov 2015 22:02:40 +0000 (UTC) Received: from pigeon.gentoo.org (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by pigeon.gentoo.org (Postfix) with SMTP id 1319C21C014; Mon, 2 Nov 2015 22:02:28 +0000 (UTC) Received: from smtp.gentoo.org (smtp.gentoo.org [140.211.166.183]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher AECDH-AES256-SHA (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by pigeon.gentoo.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id E362BE08A0 for ; Mon, 2 Nov 2015 22:02:26 +0000 (UTC) Received: from [192.168.0.12] (aftr-37-201-214-62.unity-media.net [37.201.214.62]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES128-GCM-SHA256 (128/128 bits)) (No client certificate requested) (Authenticated sender: hasufell) by smtp.gentoo.org (Postfix) with ESMTPSA id 766B433BEE9 for ; Mon, 2 Nov 2015 22:02:24 +0000 (UTC) Subject: Re: [gentoo-dev] Re: ChangeLog To: gentoo-dev@lists.gentoo.org References: <5636029F.1020304@gentoo.org> <5636FDC6.80500@gmail.com> <5637C0D2.6070708@gmail.com> <20151102200921.72bea3bc@googlemail.com> <5637DB96.9020903@gmail.com> From: hasufell X-Enigmail-Draft-Status: N1110 Message-ID: <5637DD6C.8000803@gentoo.org> Date: Mon, 2 Nov 2015 23:02:20 +0100 User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (X11; Linux x86_64; rv:38.0) Gecko/20100101 Thunderbird/38.3.0 Precedence: bulk List-Post: List-Help: List-Unsubscribe: List-Subscribe: List-Id: Gentoo Linux mail X-BeenThere: gentoo-dev@lists.gentoo.org Reply-to: gentoo-dev@lists.gentoo.org MIME-Version: 1.0 In-Reply-To: <5637DB96.9020903@gmail.com> Content-Type: text/plain; charset=windows-1252 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 8bit X-Archives-Salt: 63234cc0-e385-475b-a647-8b886bf4d2a1 X-Archives-Hash: 2d6e98fbec19f73f1796640031f92932 On 11/02/2015 10:54 PM, Dale wrote: > Ciaran McCreesh wrote: >> On Mon, 2 Nov 2015 14:00:18 -0600 >> Dale wrote: >>> Rich Freeman wrote: >>>> On Mon, Nov 2, 2015 at 1:08 AM, Dale wrote: >>>>> Then perhaps all this should have been worked out BEFORE switching >>>>> to github? >>>> We didn't switch to github. >>> Then why are people saying to use git to look at the logs? I don't >>> want to use git. >> git != github... >> >>> I liked being able to go to the tree and look at the >>> change logs when I needed to which is sometimes often. >> I think you have a technology comprehension problem here, rather than a >> technology problem. The problem is your workflow, not the tools. >> > > What I understand is this. The logs since github started being used are > no longer updated like they used to be. I realize that git is a command > but it seems that git gets its info from github since the logs are no > longer downloaded when I sync the tree. No. You should really read some tutorials/introductions on git to understand how it works and this ML isn't the place for that. It's not like SVN, so you don't even need an internet connection for the tree to work (e.g. if you've copied it via USB even). Github is totally unrelated here.