Re: [gentoo-dev] Gentoo-hosted code review

["Manuel Rüger" <mrueg@gentoo.org>]

[-- Attachment #1: Type: text/plain, Size: 1204 bytes --]

On 01.11.2015 20:23, hasufell wrote:
> On 11/01/2015 06:44 PM, Michael Palimaka wrote:
>> There's been a lot of discussion about relying on GitHub for pull
>> requests and code review and such, so I have set up a Phabricator
>> instance against gentoo.git to see how a free alternative might work.
>>
>> Here's a few examples of how things could work:
>>
>> General post-commit review:
>> http://phabricator.astralcloak.net/rGENTOO27ba62d0c7fcabdc79ce82a064b43d67b3b11cca
>>
>> Tracking commits with issues that need attention:
>> http://phabricator.astralcloak.net/audit/query/open/
>>
>> Pre-commit review: http://phabricator.astralcloak.net/D1
>>
>> Phabricator also has all sorts of fancy (optional) features that could
>> be useful for collaborative development (see http://phabricator.org/ for
>> more info).
>>
>> What do you think?
>>
>>
> 
> phabricator is horrible. I'll definitely use it less (if at all) than
> bugzilla.
> 

On 10.10.2015 16:15, Julian Ospald wrote:
> That's a great start for us, having developers announce publicly that
> they will ignore our project or require us to create bugs for every
> missing "|| die" in an ebuild.

*chuckles*



[-- Attachment #2: OpenPGP digital signature --]
[-- Type: application/pgp-signature, Size: 605 bytes --]