From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: from lists.gentoo.org (pigeon.gentoo.org [208.92.234.80]) by finch.gentoo.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 8B83C13888F for ; Sun, 18 Oct 2015 11:38:21 +0000 (UTC) Received: from pigeon.gentoo.org (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by pigeon.gentoo.org (Postfix) with SMTP id 0A6B221C07B; Sun, 18 Oct 2015 11:38:12 +0000 (UTC) Received: from smtp.gentoo.org (smtp.gentoo.org [140.211.166.183]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher AECDH-AES256-SHA (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by pigeon.gentoo.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id D188DE07E0 for ; Sun, 18 Oct 2015 11:38:05 +0000 (UTC) Received: from [192.168.0.12] (aftr-37-201-212-166.unity-media.net [37.201.212.166]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES128-GCM-SHA256 (128/128 bits)) (No client certificate requested) (Authenticated sender: hasufell) by smtp.gentoo.org (Postfix) with ESMTPSA id 960273402A2 for ; Sun, 18 Oct 2015 11:38:04 +0000 (UTC) Subject: Re: [gentoo-dev] Re: [gentoo-dev-announce] EAPI 6 draft for review To: gentoo-dev@lists.gentoo.org References: <22049.17676.1822.986579@a1i15.kph.uni-mainz.de> <56223E25.1090407@gentoo.org> <562243E0.509@gentoo.org> <20151017190306.2751829c@googlemail.com> From: hasufell X-Enigmail-Draft-Status: N1110 Message-ID: <56238496.1020301@gentoo.org> Date: Sun, 18 Oct 2015 13:37:58 +0200 User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (X11; Linux x86_64; rv:38.0) Gecko/20100101 Thunderbird/38.3.0 Precedence: bulk List-Post: List-Help: List-Unsubscribe: List-Subscribe: List-Id: Gentoo Linux mail X-BeenThere: gentoo-dev@lists.gentoo.org Reply-to: gentoo-dev@lists.gentoo.org MIME-Version: 1.0 In-Reply-To: <20151017190306.2751829c@googlemail.com> Content-Type: text/plain; charset=windows-1252 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 8bit X-Archives-Salt: 76b7f269-5ded-4086-831e-bcf1b9c63d02 X-Archives-Hash: 0fc11dc9177ca3ff5a7518ef6a896456 On 10/17/2015 08:03 PM, Ciaran McCreesh wrote: > On Sat, 17 Oct 2015 14:49:36 +0200 > hasufell wrote: >> You can apply the patches post_unpack or post_src_prepare witht hooks. >> What's the problem? > > Running autorecrap. > You can do that with hooks too (which is not very clean tbh). But at that point, you probably want to actually fork the ebuild in an overlay if you need to mess with phase internals instead of relying on some magic that the ebuild writer might or might not have done properly.